Visa resultat

Chalmers Masters Programme Evaluation 2013

Masters Programme

1. Architecture and Civil Engineering

Architecture and urban design»		39		18%
Architecture and Engineering»		4		1%
Design and Construction Project Management»		34		16%
Design for Sustainable Development»		37		17%
Geo and Water Engineering»		3		1%
Infrastructure and environmental engineering»		36		17%
Sound and Vibration»		13		6%
Structural Engineering and Building Technology»		43		20%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

2. Bioscience, Molecular science and Chemical Engineering - Master"s Programme with language of instruction

Bioinformatics and System Biology»		2		2%
Biotechnology»		34		42%
Chemistry and Bioscience»		7		8%
Innovative and Sustainable Chemical Engineering»		31		38%
Lärande och Ledarskap»		6		7%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

3. Computer Science, Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

Biomedical Engineering»		23		10%
Communication Engineering»		14		6%
Computer Science: Algorithms, Languages and Logic»		43		20%
Integrated Electronic System Design»		1		0%
Interaction Design and Technologies»		28		13%
Networks and Distributed Systems»		12		5%
Secure and Dependable Computer systems»		0		0%
Software Engineering and Technology»		35		16%
Computer systems and Networks»		40		19%
Embedded Electronic system Design»		14		6%

Genomsnitt: 5.6

4. Engineering for Sustainable Development

Electric Power Engineering»		32		39%
Environmental Measurements and Assessments»		1		1%
Industrial Ecology - For a Sustainable Society»		19		23%
Sustainable Energy Systems»		30		36%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

5. Management of Innovation and Technology

Entrepreneurship and Business Design»		30		20%
International Project Management»		14		9%
Management and Economis of Innovation»		47		31%
Nordic Master in Maritime Management»		4		2%
Quality and Operations Management»		30		20%
Supply Chain Management»		25		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

6. Mechanical, Automation, and Industrial Design Engineering

Materials Engineering»		17		8%
Automotive Engineering»		37		17%
Industrial Design Engineering»		25		11%
Naval Architecture and ocean Engineering»		10		4%
Product Development»		32		15%
Production Engineering»		27		12%
Applied Mechanics»		31		14%
Systems, Control and Mechatronics»		33		15%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

7. Microtechnology and Nano Science

Materials chemistry and Nanotechnology»		18		37%
Microtechnology»		1		2%
Nanotechnology»		17		35%
Wireless, Photonics and space Engineering»		12		25%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

8. Physics, Space Science and Mathematics

Applied Physics»		28		27%
Complex Adaptive Systems»		26		25%
Engineering Mathematics and Computational Sciences»		21		20%
Fundamental Physics»		1		0%
Nuclear Engineering»		15		14%
Radio and Space Science»		2		1%
Physics and Astronomy»		8		7%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

Background and Introduction

9. How satisfied are you with the Masters programme so far?

Not at all»		11		1%
Not so satisfied»		75		6%
Neither/Nor»		85		7%
Satisfied»		559		51%
Very satisfied»		341		31%
No opinion»		7		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

10. What year did you start the programme?

2007»		5		0%
2008»		14		1%
2009»		28		2%
2010»		83		7%
2011»		492		45%
2012»		456		42%

Genomsnitt: 5.23

11. Are you

Female»		327		30%
Male»		737		69%

Genomsnitt: 1.69

12. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

Sweden - Chalmers»		705		65%
Sweden - another university»		50		4%
University outside Sweden»		308		28%
Other»		15		1%

Genomsnitt: 1.65

13. Which Bachelor Program did you finish within (before entering the MP)

971 svarande

Affärsutveckling och entreprenörskap»		1		0%
Arkitektur»		43		7%
Arkitektur och teknik»		21		3%
Automation och mekatronik»		38		6%
Bioteknik»		41		6%
Byggingenjör»		15		2%
Dataingenjör»		5		0%
Datateknik»		49		8%
Designingenjör»		6		1%
Ekonomi och produktionsteknik»		3		0%
Elektroingenjör»		14		2%
Elektroteknik»		43		7%
Industriell Ekonomi»		82		13%
Informationsteknik»		43		7%
Kemiingenjör»		10		1%
Kemiteknik»		36		6%
Kemiteknik med fysik»		18		3%
Maskiningenjör»		25		4%
Maskinteknik»		102		17%
Mekatronikingenjör»		2		0%
Other»		374

Genomsnitt: 11.56

- Electrical and Computer Engineering» (?)
- Bachelor of civil engineering» (?)
- BSc Engineering (computer science and engineering)» (?)
- Bachelor of Engineering (MECH)» (?)
- BEng (Hons) Civil Engineering» (?)
- Mechanical engineering» (?)
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (INDIA)» (?)
- Industrial Engineering» (?)
- Bachelor of Hydropower Engineering» (?)
- physics» (?)
- Civing» (Arkitektur)
- Bachelor of science» (Arkitektur)
- Bachelor of Architecture» (Arkitektur)
- Bachelor of architecture» (Arkitektur)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- Bachelor Bygningskonstruktør» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- Bachelor of Science.» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Automation och mekatronik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- HING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING » (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- civing» (Bioteknik)
- CVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- Civing» (Bioteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Bioteknik)
- bachelor of science» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- civing» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- hing» (Byggingenjör)
- Civing» (Byggingenjör)
- HING» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- HING» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- HING» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Dataingenjör)
- CIVING» (Dataingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science » (Dataingenjör)
- HING» (Dataingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- Bachelor of Science » (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- Civing» (Datateknik)
- HING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Datateknik)
- civing» (Datateknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- hing» (Designingenjör)
- Hing» (Ekonomi och produktionsteknik)
- B. Eng.» (Elektroingenjör)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering with specialization in Computing» (Elektroingenjör)
- BSc in Electrical and Electronic Engineering» (Elektroingenjör)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- BS» (Elektroingenjör)
- Electrical engineering» (Elektroingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- Previous masters degree in Wireless and Photonics Engineering» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- Bachelor of Scinece(CIVING)» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Elektroteknik)
- B.Sc.» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of science» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- BSc» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Hing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of Science» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- HING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- Still not completaly finished yet (IT)» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- civing» (Informationsteknik)
- Civing» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- civing» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Informationsteknik)
- civing» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science» (Kemiingenjör)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- Bachelor in Chemical Engineering» (Kemiingenjör)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Civing» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Civing» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Kemiteknik)
- Civ.ing. » (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- bachelor of science» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of science» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Kemiteknik)
- Civing» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- Civing» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- HING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- Bachelor of _SCIENCE IN_ Engineering (HING) » (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of Technology (Engineering)» (Maskiningenjör)
- Mechanical engineering» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of engineering» (Maskiningenjör)
- BSc» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- civing» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- What do you mean, the question is unclear but I think you ment if we are aiming for a civil engineering title? then yes, CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of science» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of science» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- HING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- HING» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- Bachelor of Business Administration & Bachelor of European Science» (Other)
- neither» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Engineering» (Other)
- Civing» (Other)
- Väg och vattenbyggnad» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING väg och vatten» (Other)
- Väg- och vattenbyggnad» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Mechanical engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- BE Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Väg och vatten, Chalmers» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology» (Other)
- Architecture» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Teknisk Fysik» (Other)
- 5 year engineering Diploma» (Other)
- If this form is in English, why the name of the bachelor programs are in Swedish? This is one of the reasons why I am not satisfied with the program. Such a shame... Filling forms in Chalmers means waste of time ...» (Other)
- Teknisk Design civing» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Software Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Can"t deselect my choise » (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Knowledge Engineering)» (Other)
- Teknisk Fysik (civing)» (Other)
- B.Sc Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Chemical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology - Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Civil and Environmental Engineering BSc» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Telecommunications (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Automobile Engineering» (Other)
- Teknisk Fyskik på Chalmers» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- BSc. in Computer Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Mathematics)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics & Communication» (Other)
- Teknisk Fysik» (Other)
- BEng. Bachelor of Civil Engineering(HONS)» (Other)
- Civing civil engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor in Electrical engineering» (Other)
- CIVING Energy Engineering» (Other)
- Computer Engineering » (Other)
- » (Other)
- Metallurgy and material science, Bachelor of Technology» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Technical Physics (Physikalische Ingenieurwissenschaften)» (Other)
- Beng Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- general chemistry» (Other)
- Salid state physics» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- bachelor of science» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Computer Science and Information Technology» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Process Equipment and Control Engineering Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Electronic» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Computer Sciience (outside Sweden)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Interior Design» (Other)
- Väg- och vattenbyggnad» (Other)
- Telecommunications Engineering (Spanish degree equivalent to Master"s degree - 5 years)» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- M.Sc. in Architectural Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of engineering in mechanical engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics and Communication» (Other)
- Bachelor of Interior design» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- civin» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology, Mechanical Engineering.» (Other)
- BSc Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Control Engineering» (Other)
- Logistics BSc» (Other)
- Civil engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Fine Arts» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology- Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Teknisk Design» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electrical Power Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering» (Other)
- Electrical & Computer Engineer» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electronics» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering Physics» (Other)
- Civing» (Other)
- Computer engineering / software» (Other)
- Electronic Engineer» (Other)
- B.Sc.Biochemistry » (Other)
- Bsc Electrical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- interior architecture» (Other)
- Bioinformatics» (Other)
- Industrial Engineering/Process Engineering B.Sc.» (Other)
- Urban Technologies» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Energisystemingenjör (Bachelor of Engineering)på Högskolan i Gävle» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in "Electrical and Electronics engineering"» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electronics» (Other)
- Bachelor in Architecture» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- BSC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelors of Software Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Computer Science» (Other)
- Bachelor in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Facility Management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Business Administration in IT» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science » (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Information Systems» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Interdisciplinary Environmental Protection, Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Industrial Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Chemistry)» (Other)
- Bachelor of engineering (högskoleingenjör)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science, Electric Power Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Diploma in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Software Engineering (Bachelor of Science)» (Other)

14. Which Bachelor Program did you finish within (before entering the MP)

558 svarande

Sjöfart och logistik»		3		1%
Sjöingenjör»		0		0%
Sjökapten»		1		0%
Teknisk design»		23		11%
Teknisk fysik»		63		32%
Teknisk matematik»		16		8%
Väg- och vattenbyggnad»		88		45%
Other»		364

Genomsnitt: 5.79

- Bachelor degree in civil engineering» (?)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (?)
- Bachelor of Science» (?)
- Bachelor of Technology (Engineering)» (?)
- Electronics» (?)
- Bachelor degree 5 years» (?)
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING» (?)
- CIVING» (?)
- Bachelor of Engineering , Mechanical Engineering » (?)
- Bachelor of architecture» (?)
- Applied Higher Education (Bachelor of Technology)» (?)
- Diploma Mechanical Engineering» (?)
- Civing» (Teknisk design)
- civing» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Teknisk design)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Teknisk Fysik (CIVING)» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- (CIVING)» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Civilingenjörsprogrammet» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Civing» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Civing» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- HING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- BE Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Industrial Engineerig/Civil Engineering» (Other)
- You have created this form not to be filled, I suppose. I chose other, because I do not know what do you mean????????» (Other)
- Applied IT.» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Knowledge Engineering)» (Other)
- CIVING: Biotechnology» (Other)
- B.Sc Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Civil and Environmental Engineering BSc» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Biomedical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Telecommunications (HING)» (Other)
- Didn"t finish it yet, but I am soon done with automation and mechatronics bachelor» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Master of Science (mathematics specialised in Computer Science)» (Other)
- BEng. Bachelor of Civil Engineering(HONS)» (Other)
- Bachelor in Electrical engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Hing» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Poorly executed questionaire» (Other)
- Industrial Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science outside Sweden» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics and Communication» (Other)
- BEng (Hons) Civil Engineering» (Other)
- Control Engineering» (Other)
- Logistics BSc» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Industrial Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bsc. Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Computer engineering / software» (Other)
- B.Sc.Biochemistry » (Other)
- Bsc Electrical Engineering» (Other)
- Mechanical engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Maskinteknik, Chalmers, Civilingenjör» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Electronics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- mechanical engineering» (Other)
- ELECTRICAL» (Other)
- Bachelors of Software Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Computer Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING) » (Other)
- BS hons in Information Technology» (Other)
- IT» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Information Systems » (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Interdisciplinary Environmental Protection, Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Chemistry)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Electrical engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)

15. What were the benefits of this bachelor program (most useful courses)

- The courses in mechanics»
- A high tempo, good reputation.»
- Internal Combustion Engines, Hybrid Vehicles and Control, RVAD, .»
- Design work, communications with clients, hands on activities»
- Mechanics and design courses.»
- Elteknikkursen»
- Courses in Marketing and Accounting. »
- work experience was more relevant»
- All the math courses, the courses in mechanics (mek1, mek2 and hållf), thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. »
- De flesta kurserna från maskinteknik är nödvändiga för automotive-programmet. Speciellt mekanik- och hållfasthetkurserna, matematik, material, matlab och reglerteknik. Inte så mycket mekatronik, miljö, ekonomi och IPO.»
- Engineering and design courses»
- mek & hållf kurserna, strömningslära, Fem kursen»
- Linjär algebra och numerisk analys Matematisk statistik»
- General understanding of business strategy and operations»
- Datastrukturer, Matematik-kurserna, Digitalteknik.»
- Good to design in different scales, from the small sauna to city planning and landscaping.»
- No idea»
- Strukturmekanik Optimerade strukturer»
- All was very useful»
- Everything that covered surface and polymer chemistry. Krister Homlmbergs and Paul Gatenholms did stand out in particular. »
- Good combination to study engineering for three years and then project management for two years.»
- Leadership for Architectural proffessions + one studio + competitions-course. »
- Ekonomisk analys 3: innovationsekonomi was very useful»
- Foruier analysis, Quantum mechanics, Solid state physics, Electrodynamics, Optics, Strength of materials, Automatic control.»
- Waster resource management, Climate Change, Algorithm, Ecology»
- The IT and computer science orientation was very useful when applying for jobs»
- Broad array of courses. Solid state physics most useful. »
- IDE-project, Visual Brand Identity, Advanced cmputer aided modelling, Design for Experience, Cognitive ergonomics»
- Gave a good background infromation about the differnt master program topics. Especially the last year was good durning this education.»
- Technological change and industrial transformatio Creating new business Research design and methods Master"s project»
- Transportprocesser, fourieranalys»
- Innovationsekonomi, industriell marknadsföring, math courses. »
- Operating systems and computer networks. Courses were bad but the topics neccessary.»
- Ekonomisk Analys 1-3. »
- FEM with Peter Möller.»
- -»
- Economics of Innovation»
- Necessary courses: Geoteknik med grundläggning, hållfasthetslära, matte Very useful: Teknisk geologi, hydrogeologi »
- Innovationsekonomi, matte»
- Göran Sällfors»
- F.E.M., Hållfasthet och mekanik»
- Without a doubt the Chemistry courses and the course in experimental design»
- Biological materials, surface chemistry, polymer technology, nanochemistry»
- The math from the bachelor was necessary for the studies at masters level. »
- All courses in economics Verksamhetsutveckling »
- Good: all math courses, kvantfysikkurserna, elfält, (ev. fasta tillståndets fysik). Necessary: reglerteknik, elnät And knowing some matlab was necessary »
- Very useful: Programmeringsteknik, samtliga matematikkurser (utom möjligen fourieranalys) Good: Reglerteknik, PDE»
- Organisk och Oorganisk kemi, fysikalisk kemi, yt- och materialkemi»
- maths and chemistry in general. experimental design and statistics.»
- The courses that were useful in the master that I took in the bachelor were reglerteknik, biologiska signaler och ellära, and molekylär bioteknik (for the elective courses I took)»
- All the courses I attend were very useful»
- Materialteknik GF and FK.»
- Eng. Physics trained me in problem solving and disciplin when studying, as well as alot of knowledge. Comparing with students that did not read this Bach.Program we were miles ahead in tempo and knowledge and they had to work hard to catch up»
- materialteknik A, mekanik(&hållf) 1 & 2 , maskinelement»
- kemisk reaktionsteknik, matematisk modellering, grundläggande kemiteknik, transportprocesser»
- Math courses»
- Kvantfysik, Fasta tillståndetsfysik, alla mattekurser. Elnät»
- Kandidatarbetet.»
- programmeringskurser»
- The learning-by-doing aspect»
- Material Science, Manufacturing Technology, Computer Aided Design, Design of Machine Elements, Dynamics of Machinery, Thermodynamics, Internal Combustion Engines, Automotive Engineering, Engineering Mechanics»
- Fysik för Ingenjörer, Stochastic data processing and simulation, Linjär algebra och numerisk analys F, Applied Optimisation, all theoretical mathematics courses not from the advanced curriculum.»
- molekylär bioteknik, kandidatarbete, oorganisk -och organisk kemi»
- systems biology, biomaterials, biophysical chemistry»
- Teknisk Fysik requires an immense effort, which teaches a good study technique as well as structured problem solving and the ability overcome the fear of taking on a new area of knowledge.»
- Some courses have been useful and good, one example is design for experience»
- the general technical background. »
- All of them»
- Data structures, Object oriented programming, Algorithms»
- Necessary»
- All the courses that are related to industrial economy.»
- It gave a good ground for the master and for work as a chemical engineer. Courses like KAA060, KAA095, KRR100 and KVM033 were particulary good.»
- It gave a relatively good background for working in industry (process/chemical) as most courses were aimed towards these branches. As I have gotten my first job as process (beräknings) engineer, courses such as Advanced Chemical Engineering, Preliminary plant design, CFD and Design and analysys of experiments.»
- Product Development Courses, Industrial Economy, Logistics, IPO»
- The width within construction. Technical courses and "soft" courses like environment and economy. The niw was good.»
- Elektronik, Mikroelektronik, Digitalkonstruktion, Digitaltekniksyntes, Digital- och datorteknik»
- Intellectual property Idea evaluation»
- N/A»
- Matte och mekaniken. Tillsammans gör dom ingenjören. Matlabprogrammeringen har varit viktigt komplement för att kunna lösa komplicerade uppgifter. Reglerteknik och mekatronik för ytterligare "nytt sätt att tänka".»
- biomedical instrumentation, diagnostic imagin»
- most useful courses: Organic chemistry, Surface engineering courses, colloidal chemistry, physical chemistry »
- Broad education, gained insight in many different fields. That enabled me to figure out what I like best.»
- Geoteknik m göran sällfors. Inledande matte. Flervariabelsanalys. Hållfasthetslära.»
- -»
- A wide variety of subjects which provided a good foundation for further specialization in the masters programme.»
- The courses in quantum physics, thermodynamics, solid state physics, experimentiell fysik (expfys), and the general high mathematical standard and mathematical stamina developed during the bachelor.»
- the biotecknology course: cell 1 and 2,molekylär bioteknik»
- The cellular- and molecular biology courses, molecular biotechnology, metabolism course. »
- not applicable»
- Interesting subjects and courses.»
- Elteknik, Kretsanalys, Envariabelanalys, Elektronik, Reglerteknik»
- Courses in discrete mathematics, data structures and algorithms, object oriented programming and low-level programming (C) were useful for MP. I really like the fact that Datateknik includes an introductory course in functional programming.»
- Dont know, have only taken 4 courses so far.»
- Hydraulik med VA-teknik, Geologi, Teknisk samhällsplanering, Statistik, Miljö och Matematik. »
- It was more practical and less powerpoint presentations. In master it is just power point presentations that theacher in using and that makes the students lazy and boored.»
- Electro magnetic fields, Electrical engneering»
- good»
- Computer communications»
- Industrial Career: Experimental Physics MP: Thermodynamics, SS physics, Quantum Physics, Programming, 1st year math.»
- Mechanics of Materials, Basic Materials science and metallurgy,Thermodynamics,Mathematics, Basic Physics»
- Human-Computer Interaction Parallel Programming Objektorienterad Programmering Digital- och Datorteknik»
- Internships, in schools as well as in other organisations, Naturvetenskapligt och tekniskt lärande 2 (many applications also in industrial learning)»
- Almost everyone»
- Mechanics 1-3, Fluid dynamics, FEM, Math»
- The relevant courses are the typical water ang geo courses»
- Broad techinical as well economical basas. Well appreciated study course within the Euopean construction industry, well-known graduates with leadership positions within big contractors»
- social inclusion, Leadership course a preparation for the master theses.»
- Mathematics, organization/planning»
- Water resources and environment»
- Other??? Which bachelor program do you mean?»
- project courses, CAD, Sketching courses»
- Teknisk Geologi, Hydrologi och hydrogeologi, Geoteknik. Matte-kurserna»
- All mathematics courses, programming»
- Very useful to study construction courses before»
- They had clear relations to the courses in the program»
- All programming-related courses with practical basis.»
- It"s an architecture program that has a strong focus on sustainable development»
- Externanalys 3, Verksamhetsutveckling, Industriell marknadsföring»
- Very useful for learning quick and a lot. The courses are at a high level and we read a lot. I like that they did not lower the level of math when the gymnasie mathematics became worse. Instead they have an introductory and intensive course before. »
- ALA A-C, Transportprocesser, Termodynamik,Grundläggande kemiteknik, Kemisk reaktionsteknik, Reglerteknik, »
- Hmm. It felt right, just following my stomage.»
- I belive most courses in the bacherlor to be useful for future work. Few of the courses actually helped during my particular MP, DCPM, though. Företags ekonomi helped quite abit, byggande i samhället gave a good holistic view of the industry which definately helped when relating MP courses to the business.»
- Miljö- och energiteknik, logistik, matematik, mekanik och hållfasthetslära, and some courses that made me realize what I do not want to work with. »
- Datastrukturer och Algoritmer Matematisk Modellering Diskret Matematik»
- Mekanik och hållfasthetslära 1-3, Programmering i Matlab»
- GIS»
- Surface chemistry, Solid state chemistry, Polymer»
- Geoteknik, bärande konstruktioner, hydrogeologi, matematisk statistik, hållfasthet were very useful»
- Matlab, Mathematics and the Mechanical Courses have been very useful.»
- Digital- och datorteknik Maskinorienterad programmering Elektriska kretsar och fält Datorsystemteknik Digitalteknik syntes Kretselektronik»
- economics of innovation 1,2,3 statistics IT-specialization courses»
- Strength of materials, mechanics»
- Molekylär bioteknik, molekylärbiologisk metodik, cell & molekylärbiologi, »
- The mathematical background»
- Mathematics, electrical circuits, experimental design were very useful courses for taking this master"s programme.»
- All courses folllowed a progression. Next course relied upon the previous.»
- I liked math and physics, which made me go there. I got a very thorough grounding in physics and the mathematics necessary to understand it. I chose it because it contained physics and math, but no chemistry or biology. »
- Concurrent Programming, Computer Communication»
- Solid mechanics, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics and power plant»
- Design and Communication tools Material and Detail»
- Fundamental mathematics courses. Programming: objektorienterad programvaruutveckling. »
- Innovationsekonomi»
- Learning the skills of programming was very useful»
- Image analysis, Image processing, Diagnostic Imaging, Biomedical Instrumentation»
- Initial learnings on how to write reports and read economics/management litterature.»
- I don"t think any of the courses are beneficial, I thinkt that it is the combination that gives good results. But in general are the toughest courses the ones that have provided most insights and understanding such as: Transportprocesser, kvantfysik, grundläggande kemiteknik. At least two of them are relevant for my master.»
- All of them!»
- Sustainable Energy Futures (yes, read it during bachelor), Miljövänliga Energikällor and the bachelor thesis.»
- user centered design, graphical interfaces, social media, information visualization, prototyping, »
- Bachelor thesis All management courses»
- One of the best courses so far: Risk assessment... Other good courses: Engineering geology, Modelling and problem solving, Urban traffic planning»
- Catalysis, reactors, sustainability»
- Almost everything»
- Bachelor thesis, HCI»
- Introduction to functional programming, object oriented programming, linear algebra, discrete mathematics, concurrent programming, data structures, "datorsystemteknik"»
- TEK010 - Creating New Businesses»
- elteknik»
- Good basis. Many good courses in spread topics.»
- Suburbs»
- stad 2, stad 1, kandidatarbetet»
- I think they are all good even the ones that I won"t have direct use of since they give a broad knowledge basis. All courses regarding house construction is however of less importance for MPIEE.»
- Nothing in particular used, would have appreciated the ability to use my skills and knowledge more.»
- Most of the courses has been useful, especially concurrent programming.»
- Infrastructure Design, Highway Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Environmental Engineering,..»
- The high pace and the variety makes you a very good problem solver.»
- Fysikalisk kemi»
- Hardy to consider it that way, its the combination, really. »
- Strategic management construction governance Construction Processes and Management»
- All things CFD»
- Tissue Engineering»
- Mathematics courses, To some extent the later Chemical engineering courses later in the bachelor programme. »
- Math Courses Physics courses Programming courses»
- no opinion.»
- you learn the basics in everything from hardware to compilers to high functional programming languages.»
- Machine Design, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Theory of Elasticity, Bachelor Thesis Project etc»
- No benefits so far»
- All courses. Good number of courses to choose among.»
- Konstuktionsteknik, geoteknik, hydrogeoligi, kandidatarbetet»
- The wide use of matlab and other software in combination with theory.»
- Datakommunikation and all the math courses except Transformer, signaler och system and Reglerteknik was useful for my master. And some of the master courses in year 3 was good.»
- More strict course schedules»
- TEK265 Affärsdriven produktutveckling LMU215 Tekniskt ledarskap och entreprenörskap»
- Fundamentals of Materials Science»
- I dont know.»
- Quality control, Production management, engineering economics»
- BIS (byggande i samhället) and all study visits. »
- All the basic math courses, calculus, linear algebra etc.»
- Economics of innovation, very useful»
- The width of the bachelor is really handy»
- Innovationsekonomi was useful, then the collection of all courses gives a good background for this program. »
- Joining casting and forming. Metal cutting. Materials characterization and failure analysis. »
- Good math courses. Very good courses in experimental physic!»
- Six sigma»
- Transportprocesser, Energiteknik & Miljö, Matematisk Modellering, Termodynamik, »
- MPC, Linear control and advanced signal processing so far»
- The mix between chemistry and physics.»
- Verksamhetsutveckling, marknadsföring and logistik. »
- Broad introductions to mathematics, physics and programming.»
- Project Management Requirements Engineering Software Architecture Software Evolution Project»
- Sensorer, signaler och system, Reglerteknik, Systemkonstruktion, Digital- och datorteknik»
- It"s a broad bachelor that I learned a lot from 3 different fields (Machine, eloctronics, computer) and had ann opportunity to see which field suites me the best. »
- Inomhusklimat, byggnadsfysik och tekniska system was very important. Also Bärande konstruktioner, konstruktionsteknik and strukturmekanik.»
- Model driven software engineering, OOP del 1 och 2, Matematisk modellering och problemlösning»
- Very useful»
- Cell biology I & II, Molecular biotechnology, »
- Industriell verksamhetsutveckling, kandidatarbete»
- Maths, programming, project courses »
- Elteknik, reglerteknik, Mattekurserna, Kretsanalys.»
- The project courses»
- Hållfasthetslära, Byggande i samhället, Bärande konstruktioner, Konstruktionsteknik, Inledande matematik och Flervariabelanalys var bra och mycket användabara. Dessutom var byggnadsmaterial och byggnadsfysik användabara men borde utförts bättre. Andra bra kurser var teknisk geologi, miljökursen och matematisk statistik men de har inte använts så mycket under min master. »
- Leadership and communication»
- very useful - Bärande konstruktioner, Konstruktionsteknik, Hållfasthetslära good - geoteknik, alla mattekurser, mekanik necessary - strukturmekanik»
- Thermodynamic necessary Flervariabelanalys mat necessary »
- Not many usuful courses for the specific master program. Many building general competence though.»
- IT courses of course»
- Kvantfysik necessary Fasta tillståndets fysik very useful»
- Useful: Tillverkningsteknik och Materialteknik A & B, Sen tror jag att Mekanik 1, 2, 3 har varit nödvändiga för att få en teknisk grund för att kunna förstå hur viktigt det är med konstruktion för en produkt. Projektkurserna man haft som tex kandidatarbetet och IKOT har varit nyttigt för att förstå hur man driver projekt. »
- The ability to decieded your own courses »
- Interdisciplinary project work provides a good overview of the building industry. High demands on the students pushed high quality outcome in most of the courses.»
- Flervariabel, reglerteknik, S3, mätteknik»
- Structural Analysis, Structural design, Steel design and concrete design, Strength of materials, materials science. »
- advanced analytical chemistry, bio nanotechnology, surface chemistry »
- -»
- Electrical machines Electromagnetics Power systems»
- Data structures, parallel programming, object oriented programming, functional programming, some of the low-level courses (but when you sum them up it was too much low-level stuff). »
- All programming courses very useful except the MOP. Matmod very good, »
- Very useful»
- Subatomär fysik and all math courses»
- Distributed systems Real time systems Parallel and distributed advanced real time systems Fault tolerance Computer security Network security»
- Electric motors and drives, power electronics, power systems»
- Den enda miljökursen, lite byggkurser ex byggfysik, byggmaterial, samhällsplanering, byggande i samhället»
- Most courses in the bachelor program were very good.»
- Transportprocesser - good Kemisk reaktionsteknik - very useful»
- Quantum mechanics Special relativity»
- covered all engineer topics with a deep focus on mathematics (6 math courses) e.g. turbulences, thermodynamics, electrotechnics, construction, acoustics »
- software engineering funadmentals (to get the idea)»
- The elective courses in programming/computer science that I chose.»
- Thermodynamics and structural engineering»
- Good and practical approach to product development which complemented very good for the MP»
- necessary»
- Inovationsekonomin med Professor Granstrand.»
- Materie och Vågteknik, my thesis and some courses which had some stray elelemnts of acoustics.»
- Structural coarses»
- The programming skills and the projects. »
- Higher mathematics: very usefull Numerical mathematics: very usefull Mechanics: very usefull Strength of materials: very usefull MATLAB: very usefull»
- Building Physics, General building courses»
- Strategy Creation and Change, Change Management, Operations Strategy»
- open minded and encouraging »
- Very good and interesting courses that will be useful in my future career. »
- Logistik 7,5 hp»
- Sensorer signaler och system - very useful Reglerteknik Z - very useful»
- Produktutvecklingsprojekten»
- The wide range of courses that created a good holistic view.»
- Teknisk Fysik is a great bachelor"s program, in my opinion it"s one of the few really good ones in Sweden. The large amount of theory, combined with more practical stuff such as programming and experiments makes for great skills.»
- Jag hade redan bestämt vilket masterprogram jag skulle välja innan jag började på mitt kandidatprogram»
- The project courses were very good»
- Strong theoretical background, especially the mathematics.»
- Matematisk modellering, Reglerteknik, Programmeringsteknik»
- Math (liniear algebra, calculus (mutivariate especially sadly that is not mandatory in our civing-program), data structures, project based courses which let us design larger systems.»
- Good mathematical foundation.»
- Elektromagnetiska fält, Högfrekvensteknik, Elektronik, Mikroelektronik»
- Overall good courses»
- good with a broad background in physics»
- Bred variation, med nära koppling till näringslivet (Volvo Cars)»
- I dont know»
- Useful»
- Robotics and control theory. Basic programming and matlab skills where very useful.»
- »
- Programming courses: Object Oriented Programming, Java, C, Web development Software development which included project planning, requirements, testing.»
- strukturmekanik, stål- och träbyggnad, betongbyggnad (båda dessa heter nu konstruktionsteknik och något annat), mekanik, hållfasthetslära. Alla dessa på byggingenjörsprogrammet.»
- advanced programming, object-oriented programming, English language.»
- Strong preperation of communication courses and strong mathematical background»
- Organisation and leadership, information systems, the mechanical courses, basic economics»
- very useful»
- Termodynamik, energiomvandling»
- Overall very good and useful courses for a future career as a CAE engineer»
- circuit design»
- Object oriented programming-> necessary Cryptography-> very useful Datakommunikation->very useful Datastrukturer-> necessary Transformer, signaleroch system-> very useful maskinorienterad programmering->Good»
- Sensors, signals and systems. Automatic control. Mathematics. Mechanics.»
- Separation technology, Plant design, project management, waste management, »
- Engineering Physics,Engineering Math,Communication Theory,Electronics Theory and so on. »
- All structural engineering courses. Mathematics.»
- especially useful course for my choice was Economics of Innovation. Further the other management courses of is good to have.»
- I really liked the whole bachelor program. It was very structured and well organized. A good mention a few of them that had a lower standard but overall im very satisfied. »
- Most useful for the MP chosen would probably be: GKT, transportprocesser, KRT, termodynamik, ALA A-C»
- - Arbetets rum - Bostadens rum»
- All»
- Almost all of them»
- Byggande i samhället, Mekanik, Hållfasthetslära, Bärande konstruktioner, Konstruktionsteknik, Strukturmekanik»
- Physics of Nuclear reactors Modelling of nuclear reactors Solvent Extraction »
- All of them are useful in its own way, but there is not an equal distribution between the different areas. »
- Solid mechanics»
- All of the courses»
- hållfasthetslära, bärande konstruktioner»
- Reglerteknik, Linjär algebra»
- EEF031 Elektromagnetisk fältteori FFY011 Fasta tillståndets fysik MVE035 Flervariabelanalys MVE030 Fourieranalys TMA970 Inledande matematisk analys MVE025 Komplex matematisk analys FUF040 Kvantfysik TMA660 Linjär algebra och geometri TMA671 Linjär algebra och numerisk analys TMA976 Matematisk analys, fortsättning TMA321 Matematisk statistik FFM515 Mekanik 1 FFM520 Mekanik 2 FFY091 Optik FUF045 Speciell relativitetsteori FUF050 Subatomär fysik FTF140 Termodynamik och statistisk fysik TIF100 Tillämpad kvantfysik FFM232 Vektorfält och klassisk fysik »
- Integrerad Konstruktion och Tillverkning, Maskinkonstruktion, Maskinelement»
- Fourieranalys - very useful Solid state physics - good Komplex analys - very useful Reglerteknik - good Transportprocesser - good Analys och linjär algebra a-c - very good Kvantfysik - good »
- Operating systems, database management systems, software engineering and project management, English, Japanese»
- Datakommunikation Datastrukturer Objektorienterad programmering Operativsystem»
- Six Sigma knowledge, but the course education is under all qritic»
- IAR087 Industriell verksamhetsutveckling (good) »
- Transportprocesser, Cellbiologi, kemikursen»
- Mathematical modelling was very useful for problem solving. Programming courses over all are necessary. Algorithms, Cryptography, Networking, Databases and Parallell programming are all good courses. »
- Applied Signal Processing,Wireless Communications,»
- AutoCad course, Lighting course, Furniture course, Sustainable energy course, Commercial Design course, »
- Bredden pà kursutbudet. Känns som det gav en bred baskunskap inom det mesta.»
- Yt- och materialkemi (K), Kemi med biokemi (K), Biokemi (Ki), Materialkemi (Ki), Advanced analytical chemistry (Ki)»
- Ekonomisk Analys 3: Innovationsekonomi Kandidatarbetesprojektet Introduktionskurs: Industriell ekonomi och organisation»
- Karl Gunnars byggfysikkurs, Mats Heijls Arbetets rum. Stefano d"Elias samarbete inom Bostadens rum.»
- Bärande konstruktioner, konstruktionsteknik och kandidatarbetet inom brokonstruktion var de bästa kurserna»
- Linjär algebra Reglerteknik »
- You are sometimes expected to have programmed a lot in Matlab, something that we really don"t learn at the bachelor program. This sometimes becomes a big problem!»
- good background to the MP»
- Extremely good and solid education that is applicable to most things. Logical and analytical thinking ate the overall most useful skills you develop during the program.»
- the practical cources that concern building materials, computer programmes etc»
- Bachelor thesis, very useful Industriell verksamhetsutveckling, very useful»
- Project Management, very useful Operating Systems, useful Computer Networks, useful»
- Good courses: Neural network, stochastic optimization algorithims, computational biology 1. They have good organization and structure. »
- Hydro-kurserna»
- Termodynamik, strömningsmekanik, energi- och miljöteknik, värmeöverföring.»
- The only benefit was the experience gained about buildings and how acoustics behave within them. Aside from that the bachelor program was not very fitting for a Sound and Vibrations Masters Program.»
- Industriell organisation och produktion Strömningsmekanik (väldigt kul) Industriell ekonomi Logisktik»
- Mostly the basic courses, mathematics, algebra, programming, material mechanics, etc.»
- Reglerteknik, sensorer signaler och system, mattekurserna»
- The math, elektronik. »
- Programvaruutveckling A+B, datakommunikation, distribuerade applikationer, objektorienterad applikationer, relationsbaserade databaser, Algoritmer och datastrukturer, samtliga matematiska kurser.»
- Computational fluid dynamics for engineers, Process Plant Design, Advanced Chemical Reaction Engineering, Advanced Chemical Engineering and Process Analytical Technology»
- applied signal processing, model predictive control, linear control system design»
- All the design tasks and the material from it. It is very useful in the business life.»
- Science of Environmental Change, Environmental Systems Analysis»
- Courses in logical thinking such as Math and basic programming courses.»
- FEM, Strömningsmekanik, Mekanik, Hållfasthetslära.»
- fourier analysis, elekronic circuits »
- Fundamental conceptual knowledge»
- Housing inventions»
- Chemistry, mathematical modelling, transport processes»
- Manage organisations in the construction industry-useful, International project-useful»
- Very good structure in the bachelor, in all the project courses. »
- Fluid Dynamics»
- very useful»
- Possibility to become teacher»
- Human Computer Interaction Programming courses A little mathematics»
- So far all the courses has felt very useful and necessary. The mix of theory and more hands-on projects is good.»
- Functional programming, Operating systems, software engineering project, Datastructures»
- None of the courses I took at Engineering Physics are that important for me now. However, the overall analytical mindset and problemsolving gained from all the courses have been extremely valuable.»
- All the projects, working in group and leading projects»
- Linear systems and transforms, electronics»
- programming courses, algorithms, projects»
- All of them since I think it is really good to have a "wide basis" whatever go work with as civil engineer later on. Bur for my case, of corse those courses with direct connection to my masters program were good since they made me interested in the subject. They are Teknisk geology, Geoteknik med grundläggning och Hydrologi och hydrogeology.»
- Ergonomi, CAD, Behov & krav, Usability, Materialteknik»
- All basic courses in chemical engineering are nessesary»
- product development project was very useful»
- Got a broad background in math and the coarse in transport processes was very useful. It helped to have done a bachelor thesis in CFD.»
- Alias, usability»
- Material courses and mechanic courses »
- All courses within the field of economy. However, the scientific subjects provide a broad base.»
- Kretsanalys, Alla mattekurserna, elektromagnetiska fält, reglerteknik, programmering, »
- The design-Project courses, since they summarized everything we had learnt at that time..»
- Geotechnical Engineering, Foundation Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Fluid mechanics, Hydrology and water supply.»
- Byggnadsekonomi»
- good courses overall»
- Konstruktionsteknik, bärande konstruktioner samt kandidatarbetet»
- Web programming, Game design, User-centered design»
- Många kurser var bra, matematikkurserna var bra, konstruktionsämnena var också bra liksom mekanik och hållfasthetslära. Geologi, Geoteknik, Hydraulik»
- Inledande matematik, Envariabel, Flervariabel, Mekanik,Teknisk geologi, Miljö- och resursanalys för hållbar utveckling, Hållfasthetslära, Byggnadsfysik, Byggnadsmaterial, Hydraulik med VA-teknik, Geoteknik med grundläggning, Bärande konstruktioner, Konstruktionsteknik, Hydrologi och Hydrogeologi, Strukturmekanik.»
- prog, math, physics coruses»
- very useful»
- Structural design, FEM 1&2, Concrete 1&2, Steel, Timber, Structural Dynamics»
- Good»
- Matematiken»
- A lot of problem solving.»
- Not that much, during my time 2000-2004 a bit low quality. The real knowledge and exper. came from our periods at sea during that programe. »
- Good to take the more technical courses in the Bachelor as this masters program is more administrative, or the courses I took. Then you have both.»
- Very Useful: Good foundation in Mathematics. Very good skills in Matlab. Good: Already knew about tensor notation. The course Rigid Body Dynamics is more or less the same as Mekanik 2 in F2. Note: I took extra courses in Mechanics (Teknisk Fysik), Strength of materials (Teknisk Fysik), Fluid mechanics (Maskin) and FEM (Maskin) which are not mandatory in Teknisk Matematik.»
- quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, modern imaging, computational physics»
- systematisk design, grundläggande skiss, material o tillverkn. metoder, »
- Logistics, Operations planning, Transportation, Economics of Transportation»
- Ingen specifik i programmet egentligen. »
- Parallell programmering, linjär algebra, datastrukturer»
- Math, basic control theory.»
- Programming and Experimental physics»
- Algorithm»
- Kandidatarbetet Software Engineering Project Functional Programming Object-Oriented Programming Datastructures »
- very useful- Product development Project Necessary-Product Development Management »
- Six sigma, »
- All of the courses were very useful, good and necessary!»
- Biomedical instrumentation, modelling and simulation, linear control system design»
- Advanced building physics, Master thesis»
- Hållfasthetslära, mekanik, CAD, Ekonomi, »
- Useful both for employment and masterptogramme»
- Energiteknik och miljö, kemisk miljövetenskap.»
- Very useful»
- TO know hich teachers you should avoid in your choice of courses. But most useful course must have been "Arbetets rum" because of the possibility to communicate with other people than the ones that study/work around architecture. »
- Several programming and math courses»
- Signal processing»
- Signaler och sysrem, reglerteknik, digitalteknik, maskinorienterad programmering, mekanik, envariabelanalys, matematisk statistik»
- Like them all except materie och vågteori. Very unseirous teacher in the "sound" part.»
- - Matematisk modellering (VERY useful) - Objektorienterat programmeringsprojekt (TDA367) - Diskret matematik - Objektorienterad programmering - Objektorienterad programmering fortsättningskurs - Datastrukturer och algoritmer - Databaser - Concurrent programming»
- I suppose basic electric courses. »
- Materie- och vågteori - good All math courses - necessary Strukturmekanik - useful»
- Electromagnetiska fält, and Högfrekvensteknik are courses that gave a good ground for the master program.»
- Oorganisk och organisk kemi, Transportprocesser, Fysikalisk kemi, Kemi med biokemi»
- Electrical Circuits, Computing Method and Techniques for Engineering Analysis (includes C/C++), Electrical Machines, Analog Electronics, Digital Electronics, Power Electronics, Switchgear & Protection, Microprocessor & Interfacing, Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering, Signals and Systems, Control Systems, Digital Signal Processing, Measurement & Instrumentation, Electronic Communication, Telecommunication Engineering, Data Communication, »
- Electric power system, Renewable energy sources, Energy economics»
- Very useful for the MP.»
- Necessary: Sensorer, signaler och system, Linjär algebra, reglerteknik, mekanik, hållfasthetslära Very useful: all math classes, objektorienterad programmering»
- Högfrekvensteknik Elektronik Linjära system och transformer»
- intersring courses with a lot of free work and creativity, »
- Technical courses including theoretical physics and engineering know-how»
- the mix between design and technical classes»
- A solid ground to then develop a more specialized branch in security.»
- Very good general chemistry engineering courses with interesting bioengineering focus. Will be good for biomaterials applications»
- Matematisk modellering Transportprocesser i kemitekniken Separations och Apparatteknik Grundläggande kemiteknik Kemisk reaktionsteknik»
- »
- Local context!! Lena is the best teacher I have had through my whole education..!»
- Programming courses predominantly. Circuitry / signaling / electrical engineering courses were useless. "Digitalteknik" was good for additional understanding though. »
- Elteknik, Elfält, Reglerteknik»
- Software architecture Databases algorithm design Formal methods»
- Molekylär bioteknik, Cell-kurserna»
- Strömningsmekanik (very useful)»
- It is difficult to think of in hindsight since I now take for granted much of the knowledge the bachelor gave me. It is the general buildingblocks that are important, the basic economic courses, logical thinking from the math courses and the more applied organizational theories from"Produktledning and Organisationskursen". »
- nanochemistry course»
- Material courses Some math Some mechanics (failure, beams)»
- Model driven software development Testning och Verifiering»
- Marine structures»
- Byggnadsekonomi, kandidatarbetet, »
- GKT, transportprocesser, termodynamik »
- ..»
- Stad 2»
- gick 1an och 2an på annan skola. stad 2 var välorganiserad. »
- Good theoretical background»
- Mekanik Bärande konstruktioner Konstruktionsteknik Strukturmekanik (men när jag läste den var upplägg och undervising under all kritik, den har dock blivit betydligt bättre iombyte av lärare har jag hört)»
- both engineer and architectural courses. optimerade strukturer stadsplaneringskurs»
- Basic Logistics course, Industrial Economy and Industrial production and organization»
- good»
- Logistik, sjöfartsjuridik, sjöfartsekonomi»
- The base and the tool set you built which allowed you to "bloom" when entering the master.»
- System control, project courses also»
- The mathematical Courses, enviromental physics, nuclear physics »
- Its three years ago, I can"t evaluate that in sufficient way now.»
- all types of programming courses»
- Mikrotelektronik, högfrekvensteknik, elektromagnetisk fältteori, fysik 1&2, »
- Separation processes and simulation»
- Very useful: Linjär algebra, strukturmekanik, bärande kosntruktioner, konstruktionsteknik. - Good: Flervariabel analys, byggnadsmaterial, hållfasthetslära»
- It"s a good, solid ground for my further studies.»
- Thermodynamics, very useful »
- CAD»
- Logistik, matlab, tillverkningsteknik, IPO»
- Structural physics courses and most of the architecture courses (except garage at Kungstorget)»
- Termodynamik, transportprosesser»
- All mathematics courses in the program were very useful, especially the ones in mathematical statistics and fourier analysis.»
- Courses related to programming. Project oriented courses.»
- Hard to say... - Analys och linjär algebra - gave me the necessary math knowledge to apply on engineering aspects later in the education. - Cell och molekylärbiologi A&B - Gave me the background and further insight into the field of cellular biology. - Design and analysis of experiments - Really gave me the necessary statistical aspect of preparing relevant research. And many more, cant really say that there were any course where I did not learn anything relevant. »
- Over all good»
- Very useful...related to the Field of Industrial Ecology»
- Urban traffic planing, risk assessment and decision support in engineering, drinking water engineering, geographical information systems»
- Modern Imaging, Soft Matter Physics, »
- group work»
- Alla fysik och matte kurser.»
- Det var många bra förberedande kurser inför mastern. Heat transfer, Heat and Power generation, byggnadsfysik, Energy system and modeling, grundläggande ellära för ingenjörer m.m.»
- Logistik, Ekonomisk analys 1 och 2, Industriell marknadsföring»
- Cad, product dev management, product dev project, »
- ipo, jävligt värd kurs, not»
- ekonomisk analys 1, ekonomisk analys 2, Industriell verksamhetsutveckling, industriell marknadsföring, innovationsekonomi, affärsssystem, bachelor thesis etc + all courses in mathematics»
- Math courses?»
- Very useful: Cell- och molekylärbiologi, Kolloid- och ytkemi, Molekylär bioteknik, Försöksplanering, Organisk och oorganisk kemi Good: Bioreaktionsteknik, Metabolism och mikrobiologi, Transportprocesser Necessary: Tillämpad matematik, Medicinska signaler och system»
- Matstat»
- 1. Math (useful). »
- Very useful: Polymer technology, Surface engineering, surface chemistry»
- I would say the HCI-course which gave a good general understanding of methods and such. Another course was the Software Engineering Project-course, this due to that one had to plan and work together more with other students and plan your own work.»
- opened up for a lot of choices»
- Molekylär bioteknik, transportprocesser, biometodik, ekonomi och organisation.»
- *The chemistry courses are very useful and necessary for further understanding. * "Cell- och molekylärbiologi 1" and "2" - very useful»
- Basic control, programing courses, basic mechanics.»
- Bra baskunskaper.»
- basically all the math courses, but mainly "linear algebra" and "statistics and probability". I had to take some extra courses in order to apply for the MP which obviously is very useful namely data "structures and algorithms" the "discrete math" and the programming courses for the IT-programme at Chalmers.»
- Sustainable development and the design professions»
- Thermodynamics, Miljö & Energiteknik, Energi omvandling, strömmningsmekanik»
- Basic Fourier Transform, circuits theory and some knowledge on signal processing etc.»
- The most useful courses was control theory and linear algebra. Some electronics and computer science was also good.»
- molecular biology, biotechnology»
- communication theory, C language, digital circuit»
- communication theory, C language, digital circuit»
- possibility for 60 credits masters thesis»
- Got me intressted in software engineering.»
- Mathematical, Mechanical and Management education»
- IKOT, economy and a small amount from every course»
- Informationssystem Verksamhetsutveckling Simulering och modellbyggnad»
- molbio-courses»
- Design processes, construction management, project management, leadership and communication,international projcts, srvice management for constructiona and facilities, etc»
- Model driven engineering, software evolution project»
- Produktledning, good»
- NETWORK SECUTITY,ROUTING TECHNOLOGY,WIRELESS NETWORKS»
- Very useful: Kemi och biokemi Transportprocesser Biokemisk miljövetenskap Bioreaktionsteknik Bioseparationsteknik Ekonomi och organisation »
- Experimental Physics All the mathematics courses.»
- Datastrukturer»
- Molekylär bioteknik,metbolism och teknisk mikrobiologi, experimental design, Organisk och oorganisk kemi, transportprocesser»
- Transportprocesser, separationsteknik»
- Computer Security, Network Security, Advanced Topics in Networks and Distributed Systems, Routing Technology and some other free selective courses. »
- Intellectual Property rights Economics of innovation Technological change and Industrial transformation »
- Building Design Lab, Sustainable Building Studio, Material and Detail»
- Reglerteknik, Linjära System Och Transformer, »
- »
- Algorithms, Datastructures.»
- Various courses introducing specific programming languages, basic network / database courses and alike.»
- Biokemi»
- The studio: "Future visions for housing, health care & work"»
- Model driven development Programming in Java Algorithms Networks and Databases»
- Produktionsstyrning, Byggnadsplanering»
- Matematisk Modellering, Diskret Matematik, Projekt IT, Model-driven software development. For people without a programming background, perhaps Objectorienterad Programvaruutveckling.»
- Good mathemathics, environmental and building courses.»
- Sustainable energy futures.»
- Modelling and problem solving, Technical geology, »
- experimental design»
- Industriell produktion och organisation, Industriell ekonomi»
- Power System Analysis 1-2, Electrical Machines 1-2-3, Specific Machines, Industrial Electronics, Power Generation in Power Plants, Relays and Protection, Industrial Control systems, High Voltage Insulator»
- most math courses, kretsanalys, Java, most courses since they all taught you something and matlabskills»
- Programming, visual design»
- The Bachelor and Master programs are so closely linked that I can"t point to any specific course.»
- Overall, I"m happy with the broadness of the bachelor program. All math courses and basic courses in mechanics, hållfasthetslära, etc. really provided good knowledge and a good start for further studies. »
- Core and basic electrical courses»
- n/a»
- Dynamik, hållfasthet, maskinelement, fler-variabel, finita-element, Linjär algebra, matematisk analys»
- branding, alias, sketching and advanced sketching, all ergonomics and usability related courses»
- Providing a platform for further education (e.g. Master"s) - Operating Systems - Distributed Systems and Distributed Systems Advanced - Routing Technology - Network and Computer Security - Computer Networks »
- Röda tråden genom hela utbildningen är att bilda sig en uppfattning om hur datorer fungerar, från transistornivå till hur en processor och cache fungerar, och även övergången till mjukvara iom kurser om assembler, C, haskell och java. Det handlade lite väl mycket om lågnivå hårdvara för min del, skulle läst på mer om vad utbildningen handlade om.»
- Project management, communication and leadership, economics»
- Ergonomi, Design och användaranpassning»
- Byggnadsfysik och inneklimat (liknande HVAC) Byggmaterial Geologi Hydrologi VA-Teknik Hållbar utveckling Företagsekonomi »
- Business development»
- Kurserna som var specifika för industriell ekonomi.»
- Sensors, Signals and Systems Automatic Control Human Machine Systems Industrial Automation Industrial Economy and Society Work organisation»
- The width of courses»
- Oorganisk och organisk kemi, analytisk kemi, Analys och linjär algebra, Fysik, Matematisk statistik, Fysikalisk kemi, Termodynamik, Grundkursen i kemi, Transportprocesser, Energiteknik och miljö»
- Many»
- Useful courses»
- Advanced Algorithms Advanced Functional Programming»
- Algebra, Dynamics, Termodynamics and Material Science»
- The pragmatic setting of all courses, look to the use, not the underlying academia. This is really the reason to choose HING before CIVIL»
- Fasta tillståndets fysik Necessary Komplex analys Very useful Linjär algebra Necessary»
- The benefits from Z is that you learned allot of everything, you understand the "talk" with people from other areas »
- Deeply rooted, scientific courses (learned a lot of chem, biology, hydrogeology, pedology, physics)»
- The benefits were it was a broad programme and practical oriented with valuable work preparing experience. »
- all mathematics courses: very useful solid state physics: very useful, good & necessary I think most courses were reasonably good, and it is nice to get a general education within physics. »
- Since I studied both architecural projects and engineering courses I"d say that the combination of these courses I took made me realize more that my interest is greater in the field of architecture which made me choose MPARC.»
- Courses that covered regulation.»
- Not very many courses that are specifically useful for the MP, but many that together constitutes a necessary background.»
- Very interesting courses.»
- Datastrukturer och algoritmer, Diskret matematik and programming courses overall.»
- Power Electronics, Power Systems»
- VERY good program, excellent program management, good preparation for profesional life. »
- synthesis properties and structures of solid state materials surface chemistry nanomaterials chemistry»
- all of them. »
- I wanted to know more about technical staff. I am so glad to be here.»
- Problemsolving»
- Nanotechnology, very useful Surface chemistry, necessary solid state chemistry, necessary»
- everything design related»
- Most of them, i think. My master is within computer science and i studied computer science, therefor i cant really say that something was unrelated. Benefits would be: Programming-skills, data structures and knowledge of hardware. »
- Arbetets rum, som var väldigt verklighetsförankrat. Stad 2 likaså. Båda dessa kurser hölls av Matts Heijl.»
- All of them have been good, at least so far.»
- The mix of engineering and design that suited me well.»
- Algorithms (very useful) Data structures (very useful)»

16. Indicate possible improvements for your bachelor program.

- More relevant courses (who needs subatomic physics, it would be more useful to have more environmental courses, statistics, and engineering courses). Improved pedagogic thinking would also help.»
- There is a need for a course in commercial CFD, using commercial codes like ANSYS Fluent or Star CCM+ or something else. »
- Hard to say. But GU has a lot of work to do. »
- -»
- Introduce more practical elements, where the theoretical knowledge can be applied. »
- Jag tror mer matlab och reglerteknik vore bra, speciellt för automotive-programmet. »
- Improved ergonomics»
- Fysiken omkring oss Miljöfysik»
- More entrepreneurship More excel training Less tech courses and math»
- Better organization! Schedule in TIME, teachers that show up for the meetings/lectures, rooms to be settled BEFORE the students enter the premises etc. Also clearer information about grades, what"s expected from us.»
- No idea»
- No it was good»
- I belive that the nano is missleadign. Only one nano course that only scratches the surface. Beside from that I appreciate that the program focus material science!»
- internship should be able to be counted as points. most people in architecture do atleast one year of internship between the bachelor and master, or after the first year of master - at least halv a year should be able to be counted as points to get the degree in chalmers. We learn more on the internship then we could ever do in the same 6 months in school. »
- Everybody should have the ability to read BOTH automatic control and strength of materials.»
- No internship involved and no project leading exercises »
- Look over the work/point between courses and programs! And more contact with industry»
- Consider changing the mandatory courses - we who studied the bachelor program felt that some courses were exactly the same and would have liked to learn something new instead.»
- Skip all the math. No use in my master at all.»
- The kemisk miljövetenskap (KMV) was on a way too low level.»
- More knowledge about financial control. Necessary for a lot of potential employers. »
- a continuation of the database course for distributed databases/nosql databases. The distributed courses are crap and don"t have anything to do with how the industry works.»
- Group work needs to be strengthened in terms or organization of groups and in terms of the connection between courses and group work. Sustainability needs to be strengthened since many of these elements did not fit into the courses that they were part of.»
- The bachelor program has already been modified, i.e. more CAD.»
- -»
- The courses need to be more cohesive»
- More evaluations on a personal level. More connections to industry and future work places»
- Less courses involving water. »
- It think there should be more of the compulsory elective courses in the spring. I was for Erasmus exchange during the fall and that decision forced me to take all of the compulsory courses in the spring (there are only 4) which forced me to take subjects as corrosion and catalysis which is not in my interest at all. Would have been much better to be able to take courses which I was actually interested in and in the field I would like to work! »
- More project writing would be good, since that is how they evaluate us at masters level. And project writing with FEADACK»
- I am overall happy with my bachelor program. Possiblities for improvement lies within each course rather than the overall structure.»
- No, it was a good balance»
- Course in other programming language than Java, e.g. C# or C++ would be relevant and useful.»
- maybe more possibilities to choose, if you want to go into a chemical engineering master transport processes and biorection engineering for example are much more useful than if you want to go into a less indutrial master program (like biotechnology). Then it might be more useful with mroe courses in generla chemistry, biochemistry and molecular biology»
- The MATLAB course needs to be emphasized in the biotechnology program. Better knowledge in that area would be very helpful when taking the biomedical engineering master. »
- Not really. The main thing is to keep it at the same level and not make it easier in any way. After finnishing the three years one really appriciate the challenge, even though one didnt do that in the middle of year two :)»
- a more dedicated and eager person that is in charge of the program. make more connections with companies(i.e. for master thesis relations). Implement the possibility to learn CANanalyzer, labview softwares.»
- Need closer connection to the business world»
- Överlag är det väldigt bra. Något utökad presentationsteknik hade varit bra..»
- More "quick" assignments, projects with shorter deadlines. Often the projects ran throughout the whole "Läsperiod", for a better learning experience, som projects with deadlines withon a day or two would be useful.»
- reglerteknik och transformer, signaler och system. hela programmet känns bara dräggigt»
- Would be useful to clearly see what courses are required/useful for which master"s programmes. Bring back Fysik för Ingenjörer instead of the unnessecarily difficult combination of Mekanik from F and Termodynamik from Kf.»
- The hard work in Teknisk Fysik has to be motivated somehow. I believe that concact with companies during the study time can be a motivation for people to do well in their studies.»
- The teachers need to be more clear and follow the rules at Chalmers better. It really bothers me when they don"t»
- More applications, connections to industry»
- Bärkraftig resurshantering, Transformer signaler och system and Reglerteknik didn"t feel very relevant at all.»
- The technical bases are not fitted to the Industrial economy programme. In particular the financial mathematics base is really not fitted toward the whole programme. »
- More coordination between the courses with environmental focus. Many courses is more or less the same, and the topic even though initially interesting, gets boring the way it is structured now.»
- I am actually very pleased with most of the program. Perhaps "produkter och processer i ett hållbart samhälle" and "kemiteknik, miljö och samhälle" was a little to unapplicable and general for my taste.»
- More Electives»
- Add a course that teaches the C programming language»
- Integration within the CSE and BIO track»
- N/A»
- More technical courses.»
- Några kurser kändes lite väl enkla. Framförallt: industriell ekonomi, matematiskt statistik. Energiomvandlingen hade väldigt dåligt fokus (valbar kurs).»
- The courses on enviroment and toxicology needs improvement (they are loosley attatched to each other at the moment), Also GKT (Grundläggande kemi teknik) is no good. Silly amount of work»
- Workload was too high, soft skills were negliged.»
- Miljö kursen kan förbättras. Materia och vågteori kan förbättras.»
- -»
- Better "space" for the experimental courses so that the students are able to focus more on the labs. The courses are extremely good, but the structure and the fact that they"re surrounded by so many other courses are problematic. In general more ties to experimental physics and technology. I think that the program has gone to far towards the theoretical side of physics, which also is important but now dominates over the experimental side.»
- more biotechnology courses. Better teachers in some courses.»
- Need to have a basic course/intro to programming! Just something where students who never have done programming before (like me) can get logic behind it. If you don"t know what programming is or the most basic structure of it, you can"t learn relatively easy stuff like Matlab. Have to do something about the applied mathematics course (tillämpad matematik), but I know that it"s going to be re-done.»
- not applicable»
- The program as a whole would come together much better if the Dynamical Systems course was placed earlier in the curriculum. The analysis methods developed in this course would help in parts of both Computational biology and Information theory in my opinion. Another problem with the programme as a whole is that the connection to industry feels pretty weak. We"ve not met with a single company during the first year. My impression right now is that if you choose CAS, then you"re getting a Ph.D by default.»
- mer MATLAB/Simulink och COMSOL»
- I would suggest to have (small) a course in theoretical Computer Science, models of computation, complexity theory etc for bachelor students, and skip the MTS-requrement or make Bärkraftig Resursanvändning an MTS-valid course. It is sad to have an 7.5hp MTS requirement since I would rather have spent those credits on an interesting technical course. Let the students who want to take MTS courses.»
- There"s a lot of compulsory courses making it hard to chose interesting ones. Maybe the compulsory courses could be spread out over the year.»
- It is fine»
- More pedagogical teachers would make it more fun and easier.»
- Reglerteknik should be omitted.»
- Fysik för Ingenjörer as well as Reglerteknik could be move to the pile of "Valbara kurser".»
- More reflections. Why do we do what we do? Is it apparent that there is only one way? We call it "Problem solving" but who has designed the problem and are we solving the right problems? More reflective writing. And also a more scientific approach, why do we write lab reports, for instance? It"s because we"re a part of a research collective! This mindset is so embedded it might be hard to put one"s finger on.»
- Deeper knowledge in peripheral sciences»
- Earlier information about master programmes and which bachelor courses that are relevant for each programme»
- The traffic courses are not up to par with the other courses, you are given 100 questions with one word as the answer and that"s the only theory of the course.»
- more about technical solutions for sustainable buildings. how to build sustainable buildings »
- Drinking Water and Waste Water engineering needs more hydraulic content and less process technique content and of course: Better software programs, Update to Mike Urban as soon as possible»
- It is nice, how you insist on your shameful mistakes.»
- More individual assignments, less group work»
- Better administration. Lack of coordination and information»
- The algorithms course should be mandatory, writing proofs is hard and we"ve little training for it. Complexities on the level approched in the algorithms course makes all CSE students understand what its really all about!»
- None»
- It could be made more easy to select courses by presenting the choises graphically, so that you can see which courses can be taken simultaneously. I remember seeing a schematic like this from the student counselor, but I don"t think it was available for the students on either one of the student portals. »
- Teknikbaserna känns lite ofokuserade och lite oseriösa bitvis, det borde gå att plocka ihop fyra tekniska kurser med relevans för alla I:are. De varierar väldigt mycket vilka förkunskaper som krävs på teknikbaskurserna också.»
- Miljökurserna, PPHS, KMV, ETM och KMS behöver styrkas, Göras om så att de behandlar aktuella saker och inte är så upprepande pga samläsninga av vissa kurser med andra program»
- why is the course mikroelektronik mandatory? it doesn"t make any sens regarding that the course elteknik isn"t and that i have no use for it what so ever on MPEPO.»
- I belive more time can be spent on puting what we were taught during the bachelor in to a wider perspective. Relate what can be related to actual projects within the industry, give proper examples and show how and why the subjects are important in real life. All in all, I think Chalmers education focus way to much on preparing student for a possible working life as a researcher. Most students will become working engineers and could probably benefit more from trying to apply lecture material on real projects rather than doing another academic comparative study between different research literature.»
- Pedagogy, practical experiences, labs, more connection to reality. Th eeducation is too theoretical.»
- Some courses should be better on a master level. Today there"s no possibility to get an understanding for all the things included.»
- Include tensors in some math course»
- few courses to choose between. »
- Solid state chemistry did not have a webpage, instead all information was emailed to us. Very old fashion and messy. »
- More connected to to industri»
- better operations management courses calculus was really hard coming straight form high school, explore E-learning and other ways to teach»
- Better organisaton and better possibilities to communicate with the teachers/leaders.»
- The course in mathematical statistics is very bad and does not prepare the students nearly enough for the advanced course in the masters program. »
- Mekanik med biologiska exempel= the course is a joke Transportprocesser= the course is unreasonably large for 7.5 credits»
- Someone should look over the layout of the programme. It"s getting better but it still needs improvement»
- Control theory should be mandatory due to it"s wide applications in engineering. Fourier analysis should also be helpful (more than what"s covered in the applied mathematics course).»
- Especially in the quantum mechanics coursed better communication between the teachers is needed and communication also with the fourier analysis teacher. »
- Look into spreading the work necessary. Some periods were ridiculously hard to complete because of the tremendous work burden. »
- I think Concurrent programming should be mandatory, skip the choice between two courses.»
- fluid mechanics»
- The Nordic Architecture course could be removed completely and replaced with something more useful that contemplates the field from a broader more global perspective.»
- In the third year one should have the possibility to chose other courses than some of the modern physics courses, for example subatomär fysik. »
- Verksamhetsutveckling and Produktionsledning should be merged into one course. »
- More entrepreneurship»
- In general, be much better at preparing for the MsC. It feels to me like the Bachelor had a lot of courses that could have been much more, perhaps more difficult and more of a challenge - which also would have prepared you for better for the Master.»
- Some of the courses has been to easy and just a mess. To keep the quality high needs high demands on the student in every course. It should not be possible to pass exams in courses without putting in those hours that are required.»
- The program is quite narrow in its view upon the world. Also, the workload was constantly too high which made the whole program very stressful. »
- -»
- Why are there two water courses that are mandatory? The course Water resources is one of the worts courses I have taken at Chalmers. There are to few courses to choose from at this master.»
- Energy courses»
- There is so much that can be improved that I don"t know where to start. An area that needs IMMEDIATE improvement is the administrative factors at IxD. Bloch scheme X on all courses, exam results are reported waaay too late, communication between teachers, etc. Another area is the study environment that is awful. It"s modern and fresh but not at all suitable for lectures and studios in the same room. We need creative space for crafting as well as structured space for listening. The courses actually have good topics. Most are just poorly implemented and lack the weight and depth it could achieve. »
- Functional programming should not be placed as the first course. I don"t think most students start with the necessary mathematical understanding to appreciate the benefits of functional programming.»
- It"s a large step in terms of academic level between the master and the bachelor level, might be good to make the third year of the master a bit more similar to the master level, to make the students better prepared (in terms of reading academic articles etc.)»
- Some courses were completely useless and should be replaced.»
- There should be more courses that are free to select like the system of master studios. I think the bachelor program needs a update general! We should not have to wait until masters courses to learn about sustainability and how the reality looks like. The way we are thought I think should be changed to a method that is relevant today and not based on old times habits. The bachelor program needs space and time to students explore architecture and not only do what the teachers tells them to do. It could be more collaborative and also more computers courses!»
- n/a»
- Think the program needs a digital prototyping cours.»
- Make the selection of MTS courses more interesting.»
- More pure Chemistry»
- Kandidaten var väldigt spretig och det var svårt att få något sammanhang då det kändes som om inga kurser hängde ihop. Jag hade gärna sett att ekonomistyrning var ett inslag som återkom i flertalet av ekonomikurserna. Dessutom tror jag att det hade varit bra att ha en en kurs liknande "organisational behaviour orientation" så att jag hade fått ut mer utav grupparbetena. »
- The it/programming parts of the maths courses (=the matlab parts) are not relevant for the education and the way they are performed means you dont learn anything anyway. If matlab is really required it should be done as a seperate course. »
- the Design Course is more catered for architects. there is need for a design course suitable for civil engineers as well»
- Too many mandatory courses.»
- The level of the Chemical engineering courses is in general lower then math courses. They could very well have been improved. Like separation and modeling courses year 3 was not at a very engaging level. I believe they could step it up and take inspiration from math and physics courses. »
- More software programming»
- no opinion.»
- I think ERE102 Control Theory is a very good course from the point of view of content, but it needs to be better shaped for our learning.»
- Up-to-date technology, Wide overview over Embedded technology»
- ALL course need to be more structural, teatchers needs to talk to each other more so they do not talk about the same thing. In courses where softwar is used teatchers needs to know the progam if else there is no meaning having that step in the course. New teachers need to structure the courses and make them fit them self, the knowlige of studants AND the program. The modelling course does not fit into the program.»
- I think the structure of the programme is good.»
- Elektriska kretsar och fält, Fysik för ingenjörer does not fit the program. Datorsystemteknik needs to be improved. »
- Better organization»
- Dont remember.»
- Overall, would like more porject based courses where the students have the chance to work in a more reality situated process.»
- Should be compolsary with summer internship»
- More relevant courses. These courses should have to pass the same requirements which all the courses at Chalmers do. Currently. they course PMs don"t fulfill the critera because our programme is a new one and is allowed too much slack.»
- The courses are not given in a correct order, Stochastic calculus is given before basic stochastic processes which is given after basic probability theory. Obviously the schedule could improve - or at least a decent explanation to the students. »
- None, perfect»
- finansiell matematik-basen måste förbättras»
- Nothing really, Heard they are changing that bachelor and I am kinda think they are good»
- I would have liked a course of intellectual property. That is something that is lacking in the bachelor program, although some is touched upon in the Innovationsekonomi course. »
- We need another course in statistics, one more applied, including data fitting, statistical errors, and Bayesian statistics.»
- Kemisk Miljövetenskap kunde varit mer i tiden (förberett för masterkurserna livscykelanalys, global chemical sustainability och ecodesign). Fasta tillståndets fysik känns ovettig att läsa obligatoriskt så sent då man förmodligen redan bestämt sig för masterinriktning. Reglertekniken är för teoretisk»
- So far only missing application practice ofta the theorybwe learned»
- To be more concrete as in the MP. The bachelor is supposed to be very general but a higher level of motivation can be achieved if creating the feeling about being able to actually use it in industry. »
- More electronics and/or communication related courses would have been useful.»
- --»
- Detär alldeles för lite praktisk kunskap och verklighetsförankring.»
- Projektledning, synkronisera kurserna mer»
- Software Engineering course»
- Matematisk statistik och signalbehandling borde delas upp i två kurser. En konstruktionskurs hade inte varit fel.»
- It was very good»
- Utförandet av byggnadsmaterial/teknik och teksnik samhällsplanering behöver förbättras, det gäller även strukturmekaniken (fast den är väl omgjord redan?). »
- Design processes and management»
- Teknisk samhällsplanering, Byggnadsmaterial, Hydraulik och VA-teknik, Miljökurs, Teknik och Samhälle (MTS-kurs)»
- Knowlegde in matlab, we barely used matlab and it was necessary in my master»
- Good all in all, they coul have a Fourier Analysis course though and/or one on linear dynamical systems.»
- De grundläggande matematik kurserna(ALA) borde vara mer förberedande inför Matematisk statistik, Komplex matematisk analys och Fourieranalys. Kanske ska Kemiteknik med fysik läsa grundmatte med fysikerna istället. »
- Med de ändringar som är gjorda under de senaste åren tror jag att bachelor program är bra.»
- Should be more connected to industry and the order of the courses should be rethought»
- Building material sciences/Byggnadsmaterial. This must be Chalmers"s worst course. The subject is very interesting, however the teaching team is unprofessional and I do not understand how they ended up at an academic institution. »
- Lokalerna är riktigt dåliga. Datorerna är i datasalarna placerade så att man slår i knäna. (prova att sitta på vån 7 i fysikhuset). Toaletterna luktar illa, t.o.m. utanför dem på många ställen. Pappret är ofta slut på helgerna. Linuxdatorerna krånglar extremt ofta p.g.a. fel med filservern. Dessa saker har irriterat mig oerhört under hela utbildningen. Att datorerna ej fungerat har flera gånger gjort att jag åkt in till chalmers för att jobba bara för att behöva åka hem igen då datorerna ej fungerat.»
- -»
- All courses are good so far»
- Programme felt ancient, geared towards and industry that is leaving Sweden. I felt disappointed by the focus on automotive and aeronautics industry. I"m sick and tired of examples containing cars and aeroplanes. Control theory (Reglerteknik) should be removed ASAP and replaced with actual programming courses. An important course would be Operating Systems. There should be more emphasis on actually learning how to code. We should write more code and have more code reviews. It shouldn"t be possible to get through the bachelor writing bad code. »
- MOP does not fit. Many of the courses I took have already been changed, like SE and HCI»
- Ekonomikurserna skulle kunnat vara lite tuffare, för att lära sig mer helt enkelt. Jag tänker att företagsekonomi är viktigt, därför läser många dubbelt och det tycker jag verkar onödigt!»
- Remove all product development courses from the program.»
- More time learning Matlab»
- 1.Advanced distributed sysytem: The lectures of this course are very bad, I hope some of the teachers or a teacher or one from the administratiom aread come as a student and sit in teh lectures (Chines movie with japanees text) 2.Computer networks: The course contains a topic called "self stabilization" And it was not explained fairly»
- more calculation in software that is useful»
- -»
- det är egentligen inte så givande om man väljer en annan inriktning än konstruktion. Vill man gå miljö har man valt helt fel linje.»
- more practice (too theoretical)»
- There should be some recommended (not mandatory) packages of elective courses to help students choose courses that fit well together.»
- More business approach, ensure that a potential solution has a business potential»
- Kalkyleringskurserna.»
- Some courses need to be improved generally as they do not give much information to a student of civil engineering, for example the course in economics. It is far to simple to add any useful information. Other than that allowing student to choose some of the mandatory courses would be good as many of the courses will be of little or no use to me as I am finished. »
- Enviromental, »
- The engineering competence courses and the library courses.»
- Flervariabelkursen är inte nödvändig att ha med sig i alla masterprogram kopplade till bachelorn. Kursen i sig är onödigt svår att klara. Personligen gick jag kursen på annan institution efter två kuggade tentor. Gick som en dans på maskin!»
- PRoduction Logistics is very unneccesary for students who come from Industrial Engineering and Management due to earlier Logistics courses. Does not feel like a course on the "advanced" level»
- need more radical approach »
- All courses have been good. Would have been nice to have one more semi elective to chose between in reading period 3.»
- Keep all the mandatory courses. Make the course "mathematical methods in physics" in year 3 compulsory, as well as the course in special relativity and the course in partial differential equations. All these are essential for an engineering physics graduate.»
- Mindre fokus på konstruktion, mer inslag av entreprenadverksamhet.»
- Reglertekniken blir svår att läsa eftersom ordentlig grund saknas innan kursen. Dålig anknytning till resterande kurser dessutom - valbar...?»
- The control theory could be more demanding, but it is not a course given by Teknisk fysik but by the same institution that is holding my master program (MPSYS).»
- I would like a course with signal processing, where you learn about filters and transforms etc. However, I know this is not relevant if you want to study finance. But it would be good if you could choose such a course. »
- Less electables, make the programme include all nessecary math, one course in functional programming and also connect the courses in programming, software engineering and human computer interaction to show how the whole process works from start to finish already in the first and second year of the programme. The programme is today too free and which means that a future employer would not know what to expect from an civing of IT. That will lower our reputation.»
- More statistical physics, to understand both the physics and chemistry.»
- -»
- Presentation skills and excel»
- pedagogic skills of teachers have been bad. Sometimes too much focus on mathematics.»
- Lite mindre teori och lite mer verklighetskoppling i produktutvecklingskurserna. »
- no opinion»
- The Advanced Software Architecture course should have more interactive lectures. The Software Product Line lectures could be as well more interactive. The 15 minutes brakes after 45 minutes of teaching should be respected. In the Model Based Testing course, our breaks are not respected.»
- Byggnadsmaterial. Byggnadsteknik.»
- Automation system measurement»
- much repeating of parts of courses such as lean, the "envirnmental sections" or parts of the corses have men SO bad!»
- more projects could be better. »
- programming»
- Some more object oriented programming would be useful.»
- The course pollution prevention had some relevant information for the program, it should be developed further to be more structured and include projects and assignments. The CFD course was really heavy and could be divided into two I think, very interesting and good structure though. »
- All other courses.»
- Integrerad konstruktion och tillverkning - För låg nivå / dålig struktur Linjär algebra - För låg nivå »
- The MHU courses needs to be changed.»
- The Leadership course in the first semester of the master programme should be part of the bachelor programme instead. This information is needed earlier in the education! »
- Hard to say courses have been changed since I took them. By answering this question, I will most likely distort the general opinion on the courses as my answers will be based on old versions of the courses.»
- Group work»
- -»
- Less environmental courses Improved MTS requirement»
- Matlab and CAD,especially the CAD part (which wasn"t CAD for us but revit) It was so bad and they did not proceeded not from our previous knowledge. »
- None»
- Computer skills have to be strenghtened, there should be a course to learn Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. Also I feel that it is necessary for architecture students to learn much more about materials and construction details.»
- ekonomi i byggande var helt meningslös»
- All courses should be optional and MP courses should be made available at the bachelor level to replace the unnecessary courses which are today mandatory (which courses that are unnecessary depends on ones choice of career).»
- Programming, theory of computation»
- Dessa MTS- och miljökurser kan vara bra för deras annorlunda arbetssätt, men annars borde de inte vara obligatoriska. »
- The ratio amount of new knowledge per lecture or hour, it is really less than during my bachelor degree.»
- To simple compared to bachelor. It is suppose to be the other way around.»
- Closer ties to industry. »
- For IT, I would suggest even less focus on Mathematics, as it seems very rare to use the skills after you graduate. Yes, you practice problem solving, but I would suggest more courses like Mathematical Modelling in that case. We have had courses in "engineering competence" that felt very redundant, as it is repeated all over at master level. Web programming I feel is a large area that is missing almost altogether and rather important. Also, not introducing testing at bachelor level is a big miss.»
- More labs.»
- -»
- Not much related to the MP. should be possible to choose some more courses related to management and real estate. »
- Bachelor studies did not prepare me for the increased pace and effort necessary in my masters studies. More Intellectual Property, more electives in terms of mastersprogram focus (in addition or instead of the teknikbaser used at the moment. General feeling of anyone being able to study the MEI program without attending the Bachelor program due to recaps and "start from beginning"-approach»
- change the concept of Transformer signaler och system and Reglerteknik»
- Utbildningen behöver stärka utbildningen inom alla de olika digitala verktygen som arkitekten måste behärska plus ha mer faktakurser med tentor. »
- Jag tycker att alldeles för många studenter fastnar på flervariabelkursen. Jag hade förstått den höga svårighetsgraden bättre om kursen innehöll nödvändig kunskap för att man ska kunna jobba som konstruktör etc, men i detta fall tycker jag inte att det är motiverbart.»
- Take the Matlab assignments that "Automation och mekatronik" have in their bachelor program and apply it to Datateknik aswell. »
- None. »
- shorter cources in general where students can learn to work faster. more digital cources and possibility to present digital material in fisrt grade.»
- Bad courses: Dynamical systems, Simulation of Complex systems. Dynamical systems needs improvement, the organization of the course (coure memo, grading principles etc) could have been better. Also, the content of the coure is to a large extent covered by Compuational Biology 1 and it would be much better if the courses changed places with each other. Simulation of complex systems needs improvement on the lectures»
- More information on which courses correspond to what masters program would be appreciated.»
- Reglerteknik - it"s too niched and does not fit into the maskinteknik program.»
- No comments.»
- More presentations and projects. Tired of exams in every course. »
- Course that do not fit into the program: Elektriska kretsar, Bärkraftig resursanvändning, Dynamiska system med reglerteknik»
- Biorefinery, Cellulose Technology»
- more real world problems, how things work /work is done in the real world, implementation»
- Make the design tasks smaller, so the students have time to learn.»
- Sustainable Development, Environmental Management Systems, Technical Change for the Environment (remove), Environmental Policy Instruments»
- More group work. During my BSC we had no group work at all (BSC thesis excluded). This is a big disadvantage when entering the working life or starting a master like MPSOF.»
- The workload should be considered, better interaction between the courses. The two first in the master program had a good distrubution between the hand-ins but it was still very much to do.»
- More practical / hands-on exposure to manufacturing techniques»
- More tutors »
- Much less courses in sustainable development. K students who take the MPNUE program reads 22.5 hp in similar courses which is way more than necessary. More engineering courses would be better»
- More project work, should have some courses with real projects without a fixed goal before bachelor thesis. »
- A course in model-based software development.»
- More signal theory, more thorough math courses»
- Don´,t have "valfri kurser" since first of all, it is difficult to find courses at Chalmers that fit the schedule and the pre requirements (finding courses somewhere else is even more difficult). It is much better that those 15 hp are used by the program, för exempel if that has been the case, the "byggnadsfysik, inneklimat och tekniska system"-course could have been slit into two courses as it was from the beginning. »
- Tillverkningsteknik, inte alls anpassad efter vårt program. För stort fokus på "gamla" material och tillverkning som stål, då exempelvis plaster har mer betydelse för branchen inom Teknisk Design. Skissteknik borde uppdateras, ta in mer färg & form tidigare samt digital förbättring tidigare, hade varit fördelaktigt att kunna detta inför projekt i 3:an.»
- Better courses about the enviroment»
- Real and experienxed teachers, better structure, help fron TAs»
- Not much can be done since it has to include such a variety of coarses and there are no selectable coarses.»
- More focus should be on CATIA!»
- mer kretsanalys och digitalteknik, gärna någon kurs där man får praktiskt tillämpa elektronikkonstruktion och får tillverka ett eget pcb av sitt kretsschema»
- Integration with other programs»
- All courses should have a link to environmental and economical factors. All courses should also be looked over when it comes to the structure and workload. Only motivated researchers who wants to teach and are good at it should be allowed to teach! This is a general problem within the program and also in other programs from what I have heard from other students. Taking some courses at Gothenburg Business school, I feel that they have much better teacher. If they can so can we!»
- studiebesök?»
- Byggnadsmaterial, våg och materieteori»
- Nothing in particular.»
- more electable courses»
- N/A»
- Some courses should be taught over two study periods.»
- As I see it today, it has improved a lot. »
- -»
- some courses needed to have better educators. Most of the teachers were really good but some of them seemed uninterested and uninspired.»
- Ta bort reglertekniken»
- the courses in math.»
- Amy matlabcourse at all»
- The programme has a very tight schedule and minor improvements could maybe be performed within each course.»
- more electronics courses or object oriented programming»
- More options aside from 15-HP-competitions courses for the building technology students»
- More CAD! The courses should have more connection to the industry. Samhällsplanering och mer modellering»
- Clearer overall picture. General goals!»
- The chemical engineering or processchemistry courses are too similar.»
- This is a diffucult question. Overall, we should have been given much more knowledge about the different ways to work with computer programmes, and also have pedalocical discussions about how they will change the way architects have worked before. Today teachers just seem to have too little knowledge about this and also seem to be afraid of this development. Also, overall, the courses/projects in architecture should focus more on HOW to reach the goals, and not focusing on the result. We are many students that don"t know today how to go through a good process since the final critics always focuses on the result. »
- More on computational mdthods for modelling and calculation of controllers.»
- The course above needs changes and also the installationsteknik course!»
- The program has one course in interface design and one in "software engineering". Both are pretty bad (at least when I took the courses, I know the software engineering course has changed since then.), which is a shame, because both topics are really important. There was one course about environmental issues that could have been completely left out, it didn"t give anything.»
- More frequent work with Matlab.»
- A course focusing on analytical chemistry would be nice.»
- More bio-physics courses would be nice. This is a rather interdiciplinary program compared to many other. It provides you with knowledge in both cell- biology, chemistry as well as physics. Unfortunately I think the courses in physics should be grater in number and the material that is discussed should in some cases be renewed to make a more coherent program.»
- I would have prefered an option wether to study both "människa maskinsystem" and "arbetsorganisation" or just one of them. These classes are probably better to study if you choose a product development program.»
- Mer experiment, mer laborationer»
- we didn"t learn enough pratical, as computer programs»
- do an academic report instead of a design competition as the candidate in order to prepare for the MT»
- I feel that a lot of things are taken for granted, eg. If you are not fimiliar with linux systems, although you learn by doing but it could be a good idea to consider.»
- Warn people that the job market for biotechnology is extremely limited compared to ordinary chemistry.»
- The courses that treats the environmental aspects of chemical engineering needs improvement»
- »
- after the first semester the organization and information over all need to be better »
- Signaling should not be mandatory. A course on software architecture would be great, perhaps one were an open source project is selected and improved upon in a team. »
- More practical coureses either laborations or projects. I would also like to have more continous examinating, like hand in tasks ones a week. It is important however that these handins covers the same subjects as the exams. This in order to increase the number of students passing the courses. »
- Much more presentations so that public speaking skills can be improved and practiced. Also, more individual taks and evaluations so that one can prepare for being evaluated individually when starting to work. A last thing is that more internationality and languages should be incorporated or at least facilitated to take. »
- The international students are uaually so isolated or just sorrounded by othe rinternational srudents, the integration between swedish and international students can be evaluated. Otherwise the courses were great. »
- Take the opportunity given by CSN with 40 LV. Use the "extra hours" to spread the work load evenly! Better planning from teachers. I know this is a university and the students are responsible for their learning but give them good study conditions. Continuous examination during the semester, or something.»
- the course Marine transport system needs to be improved»
- Maybe some course that regards management. »
- ..»
- mer byggnads teknologi, träffade en ingenjör bara två gånger för mitt kandidat arbete, och det var inte vidare användbart. »
- More practical work, for exaple usage of AutoCad. »
- Should be more electable courses and especially it should be more practical examples and courses and not so theoretical as it is now, when we get out on the market we wont have any idea what is realistic or possible if we haven"t organized internships. This is a big downside, but it is still important to keep the theoretical basis and understanding. I think if there was more electable and not so many mandatory course it would be possible to have both theoretical and practical since one subject could be divided into two courses and the students are free to choose which type of subjects he or she wants to focus on after for example one and a half to two years of basic introducing courses »
- more engineer courses on an easy level. maybe we should have had byggingenjör couses instead of väg och vatten courses. to get a better understanding of structures adn not just numbers. »
- Think mechanical engineering is good since it make for a lot of opportunities to the MP choice.»
- Administration, the course sjöfartsförsäkringar has to be improved»
- No direct structural improvements. The problem lied in some individuals who did not seem to want to teach, but I am sure you have caught this in the indivudal evaluations and worked that out.»
- More real life application focus needed in most courses»
- Its three years ago, I can"t evaluate that in sufficient way now.»
- More quantum physics»
- Statistics for eng»
- Byggnadsfysik/inneklimat - has to be improved. VA-teknik is not necessary for the Master, but good for overview.»
- Higher demands. Students who fail to hand in their projects before deadline should be failed, or at least get some kind of "punishment" such as extra work.»
- More CAD courses»
- We need to learn Excel! »
- More focus on housing and urban planning»
- A bit of basic chemistry would be useful. As well as some more training in presentation skills.»
- Should not have courses together with other programs. »
- Some courses suffered from a true connection to Biotechnology such as Mekanik med biologiska exempel. Other courses suffered from inexperienced lecturers who could not mediate the knowledge in a clear way (Statistik och bioinformatik). »
- More contact to the industry and less unassary assignments in the courses »
- Urban metabolism. I will not take that course because of all the negative comments i"ve heard about it and i don"t think it will be necessary in my choice of career»
- more technical courses»
- More conencted to reality in getting connected to companies etc. »
- Göra reklam så att fler företag vet vad det är.»
- Det har varit många bra kurser specifik inriktade på energisystem på olika nivåer. »
- -»
- Higher demands for pass»
- nyttigare matte innan hade vart bra»
- I would like to have more courses focusing on project management, strategic management, strategic marketing, macro and micro economics, business strategy, behavior science etc I rather would had courses in Excel than Java..also the tecknical focus(teknikbas) courses were really bad and out of context I would also very much appreciated courses/discussions about ethics, CSR etc What more that could be good would be more case training and connection to companies (not only VOLVO, SKF etc)»
- The connection between the bachelor courses need to be strengthened. As for now, they are presented to the student as very separate subject areas, while they could be structured more in relation to each other - enhancing the students ability to see the diversity of a problem and use different approaches. Mekanik med biologiska exempel, Tillämpad matematik, Medicinska signaler och system - they need more structured to fit the needs of the engineering student in BIOTECHNOLOGY, and they could be connected to each other on a deeper level, also together with Transportprocesser. Mekanik med biologiska exempel is basically a repetition of Fysik A/B in the swedish gymnasium.»
- Question not clear.»
- So problems with the block schedule not working with laboration times»
- I would recommend both the above courses for this MP (Interaction) but I would have more introduction courses to programming and more work alone (or in groups).»
- make it broader and not so focused on old, physical product design»
- Very little connection to the industry, more study visits or internships would be great!»
- * "Kemi med biokemi" should perhaps be divided in three exams as in the case of ALA A-C. * "Medicinska signaler och system med elektricitetslära" should update the course plan. It feels old fashion and my impression is that the students just learn things by heart without understanding. This way it doesn"t get as interesting as it could. I shouldn"t be more advanced though, but have some elements for understanding implementation. *Something needs to be done with "Transportprocesser". Either more credits or longer time period. This course is somewhat needed for further understanding in other courses though.»
- Make some courses optional. There were no posibility to choose any courses duriog the bachelor program. The last study period you shold be able to take a course that are helpful for the master program that you choose.»
- The discrete math course fo the IT-prgogramme could have been better in many areas.»
- Architectural Competitions and Housing Inventions are to large for the amount of credits. Not enough time.»
- It would be good to add more courses concerning electricity»
- It is very light everything, no feelings for design and that is why swedish architects are so bad»
- I think the Electronic Magnetic Wave course has to be strengthened and to be taught more deeper, because it is far from enough fitting my master program. For instance, most students took the first introduction class as an review class, but for me it was 80% new. It was a hard beginning in master program. »
- More math is needed and optimization.»
- none»
- More opportunity for exercise»
- More opportunity for exercise»
- Courses not very advanced because students with many different backgrounds are accepted to the program»
- More computers, better computers. Of the computers in EDIT 3358,5225 etc about 50% is not working.»
- Please, a 7,5 hp economical course is necessary! »
- The engineering-courses needs to be better (and they are going to be better)»
- managerial aspect has been supplimented so well»
- Project management»
- Better connection with industry, i.e. cases/projects with companies.»
- More connection to the inductry»
- INTERNET TECHNOLOGY»
- I did not enjoy the specific biotechnology Courses, so I might have other preferences than normal student and should probably attend chemical engineering or mechanics instead. But Im really satisfied with the master program and that I have the opportunity to choose that.»
- Very little space for creativity. If you like physics and mathematics before you enter the program, chances are you will be less enthusiastic about it afterwards. I felt there was too little stimulus. Pen and pencil exams in JAVA-programming are not useful. It"s hard to rearrange code snippets, impossible to debug-compile them, get good layout for writing code and so on. The grades don"t represent knowledge, but rather how good your handwriting is. JAVA is also a terrible choice of a language. Writing on paper is not an accurate assesment of your programming knowledge. Many books were awful. I think students should be given an opportunity to solve problems in groups of 6-8 people twice every week. One or two problems should be prepared beforehand, demonstrated by some volunteer, and some other given to them by the teachers to solve on the spot. PBL might be a good option there.»
- Ta bort Regelerteknik och signaler och system»
- Courses related to biotechnology is very late in the bachelor program. It is not until almost 2 years has passed that the courses you thought you were going to get are beginning. I am very happy that the program brings such wide knowledge about math, chemistry etc. but it becomes discouraging for those how love biotech and people who discover that they hate biotech have already followed the entire program.»
- I completed bachelor program before enrolling into Masters.»
- Creating new business - the topic is interesting but the structure and the content of the course need to be changed and improved.»
- Architectural Competitions is too short to complete a project»
- »
- Signals and Systems, and Control Theory. Are horribly difficult courses. The failing % is almost never below 70%. If this consistently happens year after year, something has to be wrong with the courses. It"s not possible that people who normally have no problems passing the courses keep failing these two courses. »
- Perhaps the signal handling and control systems engineering courses needn"t have been mandatory.»
- Det är många små kurser i poängantal. Läser oftast 3 kurser samtidigt istället för 2st som är på 7,5hp. »
- Many changes have already been made since I finished my Bachelors... DigDat and MOP weren"t very helpful, but were still interesting. The Software Engineering course wasn"t really satisfactory. Something about project management and a bit of program architecture would be useful.»
- There are to few choises. I would like to be able to choose more courses about infrastructure and geotechics. Also i feel that the WET-courses more or less has been very poorly organised.»
- remove the applied mathematics course. very narrow usefulness and a tough course.»
- Mattekurserna i början kunde varit bättre, Stig Larsson kunde varit mer motiverande och inte så teoretisk»
- Courses such as Engineering of Automotive System, Vehicle Traffic and Safety, Road Vehicle Aerodynamics did not offer much, they were too general and most of this information for this course is available on WikiPedia. Paying 280K SEK should give a little bit more in terms of academics. Also the teacher for the basic Vehicle Dyanmics Course is pathetic and I feel that this teacher has to be changed.»
- cant think of something really now»
- add more arduino based courses»
- We have a large amount of elective courses, and there"s not much information available about which courses one can choose. The program could be divided into "subprograms", much as the Engineering Mathematics and Computational Science master program is, so that you can choose courses in groups instead of always choosing courses one by one.»
- Many courses were very focused on construction, which all may not be entirely necessary for MPIEE. Bärande konstruktioner, for example. More courses in road and traffic engineering would have been nice. »
- Ta bort alla tentor och duggor som är datorbaserade. De mäter inte vad man kan utan bara vem som känner vem så att de kan få fram svaren. Detta gäller speciellt mattematisk statistik.»
- N/A»
- n/a»
- baisc electronics instead of "strömning"»
- All courses which require laboratory work should introduce a grading systems for the laboratory work. The final grade for the course should be based on the exam and the laboratory work. The Advanced Topics in CSN should be offered a report paper instead of a final exam. It would be more beneficial for the students to write a report then to take an exam. Simply because of the nature of the course (e.g. different topics and different professors.)»
- Transformer signaler och system, den kursen va sämst. Verkligen sämst. Den va som en introduktion till ämnet fast va skitsvår och sen när man läste reglerteknik så fattade man allting. En grej som jag har tänkt på nu är att det hade vart kul att lära sig mer om drivrutiner. Vad det är, hur det fungerar och hur man programmerar dem i praktik.»
- More courses in economics, there should be elected course in risk/ uncertaintity management. There should also be courses in presentations techniques, and feedback after presentation on strong/weak areas for improvments.»
- mer fokus på tillverkning och ekonomi»
- Logistik bör vara valbart för studenter på VoV. Annars bör alla kurser ses över och göras modernare. Känns inte som man läser på Sveriges modernaste universitet när man t ex. har samma lärobok som sin far som läste här för 30 år sen (Geoteknik till exempel). »
- More entrepreneurial thinking and idea evaluation»
- Bättre nivå på teknikbaserna (maskinbas)»
- More case-solving and more practical work.»
- Tillämpad matematik and Reglerteknik seem quite useless»
- More control theory»
- Many, but foremost develop the balance of academia and pragmatism in improved and conscious ways. In some aspects and courses academia is more valid than other.»
- Error estimate of parctical labs and how to present the error in reports and presentations.»
- The program has just change the course structure so I cant reflect on that»
- need to be more tools that you learn... we learned a lot about the environment, but didn"t learn how to solve any problems»
- Personally more water engineering courses would be benificial than just the hydraulic engineering course. »
- I think it would be nice to try to put the courses in a context for the students, i.e. what have we studied so far, why is this not sufficient if we want to do this and that? Try to connect courses in that way, like have a bridge like that in the beginning of a course.»
- There are a number of courses that are not that relevant, such as two different communication courses (swedish and english). Should be a maximum of one communication course. Also, the course "Technology for a global sustainable society" does not really add any value to our education.»
- Risk Management needs to be improved in terms of evaluation»
- Pollution prevention- Strengthened»
- I think there should be a little more courses in nano technology since that whats the titel of the master. There are only one course that can be chosen and even if some courses have small part of nano its very little. But maybe it comes more into physics then.... »
- Here I can go a little bit deeply in some subjects.»
- It does not feel like a nanotechnology master.. There are too few courses to choose from in lp 4. »
- More and closer work with companies.»
- More advanced mathematics. I feel that all courses i"m taking at master level assumes a higher knowledge of math than what i was expected in the bachelor. The difference is big and i wish i had taken some extra course, e.g. multivariate calculus, more linear algebra and something more in statistics. »
- Trean var rörig och otydlig. Mycket på grund av att den innehöll 2 st hårda konceptuella kurser, medan tvån varit mer teknisk. Jag kände inte att jag hade verktyg för att hantera det, och det fanns inte att tillgå heller. Gärna att man får ha nån genomgång efter varje projekt och kritik för att sammanfatta vad man kan ta med sig från kritiken.»
- Introduction to interaction design. The 3D modelling course should not only focus on Alias but on other softwares as well, such as CATIA and SolidWorks which are very common within design firms.»
- Maybe add Mathematical Modeling as a mandatory course»

17. How satisfied are you with the information (before applying) about the Masters programme (MP)?

1064 svarande

Not at all»		22		2%
Not so satisfied»		100		9%
Neither/Nor»		173		16%
Satisfied»		581		54%
Very satisfied»		170		15%
No opinion»		18		1%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

18. From where did you get the most important information about the programme?

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The web»		718		66%
Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers»		344		31%
Presentation/Information within Chalmers»		234		21%
Presentations/information outside Chalmers»		17		1%
Written information (not web)»		64		5%
Friends»		369		34%
Other sources (please comment)»		26		2%

- REALLY hard to get to the right page within the web. Should be less "clicks" to find the right information.» (The web)
- European Education Exhibition» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))
- studycas.com is a brilliant site for my master"s programme!» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Friends)
- A researcher I met at University of Auckland who was an alumni of the same programme a few years back. » (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- People which already did the Master program in my home school» (Friends)
- Phone calls» (Other sources (please comment))
- Very poor information about all programs, to be honest.» (Friends)
- My bachelor thesis supervisor » (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Why don´,t the programs have an information day at Lindholmen as well??» (The web)
- I had a excellent bachelor thesis and Patrik Albin, who was my mentor, inspired me to continue» (Other sources (please comment))
- Volvo colleagues» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Students in the welcome comitee» (Other sources (please comment))
- Informationen på hemsidan behöver förbättras och utökas. Skulle också vara bra om det fanns likvärdig information om alla masterprogram. » (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- BSC-coordinator was the best source of information.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- My supervisor at my home university who studied the programme a year before me» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- I"d like to point out the thing most student and staff already know: Chalmers webpage is a horrific mess, and every time you are trying to "improve" it, it gets worse. http://xkcd.com/773/ is relevant here.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- They had a lunch bunch where they presented the program and had some guests who had similar background as the program would give you. That was really good and helpful.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))
- talking to the administration» (The web, Written information (not web), Other sources (please comment))
- I princip alla foldrar om masterprogram som finns är dåliga. Det står samma sak i alla, utvalda buzz-words. Jag kan bli chef, projektledare etc. Detta mastersprogrammet är framtiden. Ge mig något matnyttigt! Översyn behövs!» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- Imre Pazsit» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- I wished I would have received more info from the students that already have studied one year and have the same background.» (The web, Written information (not web))
- I find the web over all is not very communicative at this point. It is hard to find the information you seek.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends)
- I did not even get a notification on when the cources would start. I got all information from fellow class mates. The same thing concerns the master thesis course.» (Friends)
- It was my Mistake with registration » (Other sources (please comment))
- The information was very late (close to the last date of applying) and bad coordinated by the teachers. Some masters program had really extend infomration and some said basically nothing. I think chalmers.se was my greatest source of information.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- The presentation by the DCPM master coordinator (Göran Lindahl) were a DISASTER! Came late to VR, and weren"t present in Ljusgården. Also that day you have in Ljusgården is set to late since which courses we choose for the last term in our bachelor determines which master we can choose. Therefore I think this day should be held before christmas in the 3d year! (this will also leave students the possibility to think about their choice during christmas when we have time!)» (Friends)
- No information was given» ()
- Talking to professors on the institution» ()
- The course Introduction to sound and vibration» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))
- Master fair» ()
- Marms lunchsföreläsningar med mastersprogram» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Family» (Other sources (please comment))
- Chalmers website.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Fasta tillståndets fysik» ()
- Facebook contacts» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- mail to the program coordinator» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Didn"t know anything about the other masters programs than the ones connected to CSE (MPCSALL and MPSCN). I would have liked to have information about Complex Adaptive Systems and Mathematical Engineering since they are very related to CSALL and CSE.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- I visited the program for one day in late 2010. I also called and talked to Staffan Björk and Olof Torgersson by phone too.» (The web, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- CIRC» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Meeting with former erasmus students at my bachelor school.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Other sources (please comment))

Your own effort

19. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

1070 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»		81		7%
Between 30-40 hours/week»		335		31%
Between 40-50 hours/week»		411		38%
Between 50-60 hours/week»		183		17%
More than 60 hours/week»		60		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. How would you grade your studies (within the MP)

Severe problems with more than 2 courses»		56		5%
Some problems but only with one or two courses»		396		37%
No major problems»		537		51%
It was too easy - no real challenge»		54		5%
No opinion»		26

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- unclear question - grade based on what? what kind of problems...» (?)
- I liked the problems, so this should not be seen as anything bad, but two or three courses were really hard.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- See above, lack of programming knowledge that people from many other programs had made some of the courses very "heavy" since it was not only the course material that was new. Also worth mentioning is that I was an exchange student for the first semester, so to be able to finish on time I studied at a higher pace. » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Had problems with more than 2 courses but would not call them severe» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- It"s tough if you take courses in another order than intended (e.g starting some earlier).» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- I have been struggling with understanding the full scope/purpose of the group projects and some examinations except for three courses have given me anxiety. The first two courses and Gunnar Lanner"s courses are the only one"s that didn"t feel intimidating. It most probably has to do with my technical limitations as well » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Since I do not have a solid, proper CS background, I have struggled a lot with certain aspects of the CS field.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- I"ve had "problems" with courses due to lack of time, although this is not the fault of the Mater Programme, but extracurricular activity.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Its not severe, just unlucky» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Many of the courses are really hard» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Mechatronic design was a big failure i am afraid» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Programme is a deep disappointment. Would change to another programme if it weren"t for the fact that I don"t have tuition left for an additional year. Most problems are due to poor administration, but some are due to the programme simply being poorly designed. For example the emphasis of the programme is too disconnected from industry, or rather too connected to the wrong parts of industry. Again - please rid us of this focus on automotive!» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Don"t get good response from the teachers, they are slow answer emails, giving good critics and function as teachers by doing interesting lectures and learn out important factors. Several teachers rather talking about themselves then the subjects, and if they talk about the subject they have a too low level or they make it not interesting by using one tone voice or by talking through the literature. » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Perhaps have I selected to advanced courses in the "free courses". » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- "Severe" with regard to lack of time. I finish most of the courses on a later occasion, sometimes with a higher grade than 3. Time spent (above) is more concentrated up to 40 h, due to three kids and a house - a life outside Chalmers» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- The lessened work load and "severe problems" was partially intentional, I had part time engagements that distracted from performning 100% and was prepared to repeat some courses.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Some of the coursed were badly planned and bad teachers who sometimed teached outside the specifications of the course. The project course wad not thought » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Difficulties to understand learning objectives and getting tutoring during courses resulted in a lot of time spent on learning things which turned out to be misinterpretations» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- I"ve passed all courses and have good grades but you have to put in a severe amount of time and effort which at times is not reasonable, for example when you for several weeks in a row are at school between 8am to after midnight more than five days a week (and the other days you spend at least 5 to 10 hours studying)» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Bad time management caused me to fail several courses this winter due to other priorities.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- However this is because the bachelor part of teknisk fysik nearly killed me and thereby I have no energy left to study... If the bachelor would have the same pace as the master the overall time here at Chalmers would have been far more pleasant!» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- i have problems because of health issues.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- The teachers are not demanding at all... most people are completely not serious, and they get away with everything. The classes are not rigorous, and I was really looking forward to learning a lot, but unfortunately almost all of the classes have been disappointing except for a few (and those were guest lecturers - Thomas Sterner and Cristal Cederborg, and Henrikke Baumann.. the rest were really not inspiring). Bjorn was good, but by the end the class had lost the overall picture but what was worse was the fact that he seemed unopen to alternative theories even when that was the very thing he was presenting. Another story with Fredrik Hedenus, when he asked a question, everyone answered the question correctly, but then he gave many people half points because he meant to ask a different question and there was no arguing with him. The policy instruments class was dreadful.. possibly the worst class I have taken, except for when Thomas Sterner was there- then it was one of the best. Overall though, the projects seem to be graded unfairly (depending on who your supervisor is), and most classes I was disappointed because I really wanted to learn but learned almost nothing. It feels like more of an introductory program to people that have no idea about the environment or environmental issues than people who know about this and want to do something about it. The names of the classes in the program are great, but the content and teaching skills do not reflect this.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- A course or two have been very poorly run and taught. I imagine the student-feedback post exams will show you which ones.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- gui course. also grading problems with introduct» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- superficial education in some courses» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Exams of two courses were irrelevant, not at all related to what we learnt in class.Also the tutor of one of those two courses was not good at all.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Condensed matter physics is no stroll in the park. Biological physics have content and examination for a course of 15p, but otherwise no problems at all» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- There is a big scope of improvement in the teaching of some of the courses. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- There are courses irrelevant to my studies, however I don"t have any more options.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Non equilibrium processes should in my opinion only be recommended to students with a background in physics, it was horrible without previous courses in statistical physics so I dropped it after a few weeks. Information theory felt hard due to its theoretical nature, whereas in Dynamical systems most the problems were caused by the introduction of Mathematica (even though Stellan does a pretty good job helping us start out) and some very hard/uninstructive exercises in the problem sets.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Difficult» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- More pedagogical teachers would make it more fun and easier. The structure in some courses was beneath contempt.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some of the courses (Computational Phys, for example) require a lot of work put down and that you really understand the course but you usually don"t have to worry about passing, as you have many opportunities to prepare and make sure you do what"s necessary. Continue like this, make sure we learn A LOT without worrying about passing.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Greate variability in difficulty between courses some was really easy some was really hard.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some of the courses, especially the ones about distributed systems had bad lecturers and exams. The algorithms course was hard (but good), and I feelt ill prepared for that course. I failed only one course. The reliability, realtime and security courses was good (but security was too easy).» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- One re-exam so far.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Advanced organic chemistry was a good coarse, but the workload in that coarse is huge compared to others. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Depends on what you mean. The administration of the courses and the possibility of choices is awful.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I chose courses which interested me and would pose a challenge according to "go har or go home". I was not willing to invest the time and money involved in studying not to get to study what interested me. Since this involved topics which are hard for me, or which I have a lower degree of knowledge in (such as programming) it was a challenge.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The same teacher in both courses that I had problems with...» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I took the course Models of Computation in the second study period of the first year and failed miserably. This course and some others (Types for Programs and Proofs comes to mind) are much too hard before you take Programming Language Technology. Having taken all three mandatory courses in the program are musts if you are to take almost any elective course. Study period 2 year 1 becomes a problem when you need to select an elective course before completing all prerequisites. Make sure you clearly describe the prerequisites.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- As expected. Hard courses. But interesting.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- the work load was crazy the first semester. It would have been better if it was more even during the whole program.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Autumn was quite hard, Spring has been easier.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Only a problem due to my achievements within the course, no problems with the courses themselves.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The courses are most often not aligned at all which causes a lot of trouble getting case groups together, planning the studies as well as to hand in seminars on a regular basis. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The optimization courses were hard» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- A large change was made during our year in which the 30 HP master thesis was exchanges for a 60 credit thesis. This has lead to much confusion as the new program structure has been developed during the course .» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- A topic called self tabilization within computer networks in the first period first year.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Not in me lacking skill, but teachers lacking willing or skill.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- A balanced programme with focus on continous examination. Very good indeed!» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The term paper course was a bit unclear» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- passed all courses. but the FEM courses bearly.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some studios/courses in MPARC are very well planned and administrated and some are not. Housing, good! Matter space, NOT good. Urban, bad from what i"ve heard. The working facilities are almost always a issue.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Konstig fråga! Vad är ni ute efter? Ni måste lära er ställa bättre frågor för att kunna få mätbara undersökningar. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some courses were too vague and unclear what the goals of were.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The first Nuclear Chemistry course i very difficult and the contents do not represent the examination. The coupling between theory and problem solving is very distant.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I studied and still do alot and if i wont do that I would probably have problems with a lot of courses. I think it would be nice if they can remember that we are people sometimes, that we don"t live at school and that we deserves actual lifes. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Alla dagar är inte ultimata och vissa föreläsare är mindre engagerade. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Coming from the bachelor program Väg- och vattenbyggnad I was unprepared for the parts of the masters program that required knwledge of signals and other concepts of electronics. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some things have been quite hard to do, but not to hard.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Marking system is different than what I"ve been used to in the UK so preparing for exams has been the greatest adjustment to make (and still making - as every lecturer has a preferred system of marking but one that I"m not made aware of until classmates indicate this to me or I get the results back).» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Most of the problems exist due to uninspiring teachers and shortcomings in the structure. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Material performance and Heat and Moisture. Fruktansvärt dåliga och ovärda kurser!» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- But then I had already taken some courses in advance and I study at Handels at the same time, so I have taken between 1 and 3 courses (at Chalmers) each study period. So its a bit hard to tell... But I would say bewteen 15-20 hours per course and period.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- It always has to do with the teachers, and in this case teachers that have too much to do around school /work/private. They all have a sort of "tunnelseende" and they don"t see what the students need or hear what they have to say. These teachers do not function as rolemodels for the students at all. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Very challenging, but with the proper amount of work it works out.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- MT-period was really tough» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Metal processing was in general a bad course. The teachers didn"t care about the course. Bad communication with students. Uneven workload depending on assignments. Interesting content though.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- quantum physics was quite new» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I need some more specific courses for master program. The many courses over here are I have already did in my bachelors. I am expecting master course should be streamlining our education to one particular field in a narrowed manner.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Problems here not clear, could be from the student side or the university side.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Time management difficulties in LP3 first year if choosing protein engineering together with the mandatory course advanced analytical chemistry. Especially laboration clashes in the two courses. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I"ll never finish this damn thesis...» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Vehicle Dynamics Basic and in The advanced Vehicle Dynamics the in charge for problem solving does not explain anything.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- We had far too many group projects that were not properly evaluatd, we only got our grade and no feedback ==> little chance to improve » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The first course about distributed systems was okey. The one called "TDA297 Distributed systems, advanced course" was insanly hard, for me at least. Had to do the exam four times before I passed. I don"t think the teacher is very good. And the course named "DAT145 Advanced topics in computer systems and networks" was impossible to fail. Didn"t do all the assignments but passed anyway and got the exact amount of points on the exam to pass. It"s also a weird course with strange content.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Mastern har varit mycket bättre än Kandidaten. Men det kan också bero på att jag haft praktik och har fått en annan syn på vilka kunskaper jag behöver ta till mig.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The problem for me was that I never really had any technical course in pure English before. So in the beginning I only can understand part of the course.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- some organization problems in the Solar Decathlon organization, the corse was left behind from the school even if it is a very important international competition. The teachers are too kind generally and don"t make you challenge yourself.» (No major problems)
- Only problems with understanding what"s expected and also to understand the time schedule (since it changes ALL the time and different versions can be found on pingpong/mails/classroom board)» (No major problems)
- Please note 2/3 of the courses were taken abroad! They are not considered here.» (No major problems)
- Below --> Link to goals not working. Cannot answer questions about them.» (No major problems)
- since you´,re more dedicated to the subjects the performance will be better compared to Bachelore» (No major problems)
- One course was really bad, Nanoscience.» (No major problems)
- lots of writing in the master exams, which doesn"t mean i got the knowledge, just temporarily learning some things by heart... in general examiner doesnæt seems to care about the feedback... so i did what all the other studnets before me did, just learn everything by heart, and forget it afterwards which is a lack of problem solving, analysing different perspectives etc... this can and should be improved!» (No major problems)
- Some of the courses are created to be hard only to be challenging without a real pedagogical reason behind it.» (No major problems)
- It is often too easy to pass but a lot of work for a five. It bothers me a bit that even people with lacking skills and knowledge seem to pass the courses.» (No major problems)
- Very good master"s programme. Could use some improvements with the electible courses. It has an obvious trace if you want to be good at marine structure mechanics, but for ship resistance and hydrodynamics, as is my favourite topic, some improvement is needed. Maybe more cooperation with Applied Mechanics on the topic?» (No major problems)
- Somewhere between the last two options» (No major problems)
- Some courses were challenging, but all were doable. » (No major problems)
- I don"t know if this is connected to my time answer, but I put in around 30-40h/week, and got an average above 4 in grades. Most students with a similar background as my self took 3 courses per period and received high grades by putting in (and here I guess a bit) around 40-50h. I think that the level for pass in almost all courses could be increased, and therefore lifting the weakest students. » (No major problems)
- I think some courses involve topics which we have already discussed in the biotechnology bachelor program. that is a huge dissappointment for me. I"am thinking of eg tissue engineering 1» (No major problems)
- What do you mean with problem? if the course is difficult, it is a problem? Courses should be difficult, otherwise there is no use in studying...» (No major problems)
- Some courses are to simple and some are not but I suppose thats the way it is» (No major problems)
- But the level of the courses vary greatly, some courses are on a high school level, others are severely difficult and time consuming.» (No major problems)
- The autumn"s workload was much higher than the spring"s.» (No major problems)
- At the beginning it was a bit hard and stressful for me, since I was away from studying for 6 years and also the educational system was quite different from that of my country. But no major problems, one can get used to it after a study period or two :)» (No major problems)
- The work load is somewhat uneven. Sometimes I needed to spend 70 h per week, other 20 h.» (No major problems)
- Inga större problem men däremot en hög arbetsbelastning, för att klara det krävs mycket tid och jag upplever aldrig att jag är helt ledig trots att jag lagt 50h/vecka i snitt. » (No major problems)
- Question 19 - närmare 50 än 60» (No major problems)
- In my opinion, the level of difficulty should be higher.» (No major problems)
- No major problems but interesting and challenging which made you walk an extra mile to achieve more» (No major problems)
- No problems, but very challenging.» (No major problems)
- The course "Sustainable Building Competition" (spring 2012) was too easy, no real challenge. » (No major problems)
- At first glance it looked easy, but for deepening and synthesis, it became very interesting and some times difficult. » (No major problems)
- Too much time had to be spent on the projects, which resulted in over-working ourselves but knowledge of the area and thereby passing the exams.» (No major problems)
- It takes more time now at the master since there are group projects in all courses. In the beginning that felt hard (cause it takes a lot of time) but by now I feel that it is a very good way to learn. I study a lot on my own during weekends and similar. Because I"m interested.» (No major problems)
- It was very disappointing to learn that for instance physical ergnomics was exactly what previous students had told us - namely the samt course we had during our bachelor but now in English. The most disappointing thing was to learn that the master coordinator knew that previous students had been disappointed with the course but nothing had happened since the course examinor told him that there were no problems.. Though the course is now gone, after my year"s course evaluations.. Furthermore I would say that I have not learned very much new during my master"s compared to bachelor, that we read about the same courses. Furthermore I am disappointed in that the master"s programme has changed so much in terms of courses, which are voluntary or obligatory, since I applied for the education 5 years ago.. » (No major problems)
- But it requires more time than in the bachelor» (No major problems)
- The coarses were over all very well planned.» (No major problems)
- That does not mean that I didnt fail an exam, which i did. But it has more to do with the actual exam than the course itself. » (No major problems)
- Some lower grades in the begging but now I"m back on track again.» (No major problems)
- Studied first year in Singapore. So based on second year.» (No major problems)
- Higher tempo than bachelor studies, more structured time table and greater amount of hand-ins. However, easier to pass if you work according to the course schedule.» (No major problems)
- Great pedagogy and action-based learning model!» (No major problems)
- I managed, so no big problems, sometimes I had to spend a lot of time in school, but sometimes (especially in start of study period) we have more free time, so it all adds up somehow» (No major problems)
- challenging but because of good teaching no major problems» (No major problems)
- Few hiccups here and there, but otherwise "smooth as a butter".» (No major problems)
- I was one year in Munich so I only attended two master courses at Chalmers. Computational physics and soft matter physics, good and interesting courses.» (No major problems)
- The level of difficulty is enough, but I think the case studies and project doesn"t reflect the real world, always a little modified to be easier but I feel that these modifications/limitations are not well explained. » (No major problems)
- It was without major problems. However I"d consider to raise the bar to deliver higher quality work to end up with an excellent portfolio. Focus on coding (for prototyping) should also help in learning more and be challenging.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Several courses are repitition from the bachelor and very little new is taught» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The exams were quite easy compared to my Bachelor studies (in Darmstadt, Germany). Exam questions usually didn"t require in-depth understanding of the subject matter.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- I"d like to add that I only think that passing a course was too easy or that it wasn"t particularly challenging. To excel took more effort naturally, the MP was very different from that bachelor as it involved more "soft" issues rather than being technically complex.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The courses remind of each other, and are no real challenge for someone who have been studying engineering before - the program doesn"t feel like an engineering program. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- I expected the master programme to be rather challenging, instead it was much easier than my bachelor.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The bachelor studies at Chalmers was challenging and hard. The master felt just as a transportline between this and the continuing career. Please, why must it be that simple during the MP? Why cannot the teacher demand a lot from us suddenly? At leas they could be expecting us to study those 50 hours a week the credits corresponds to! I think Chalmers has severe issues with its master programs where most of them seems to be quite easy. The scope of the masters to introduce us with more practical skills works really well. But how can it suddenly be acceptable to have half the material in one course (compared to the bachelor). How can it suddenly be acceptable to have four lectures a week?» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Much lower pace than during the first three years.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Only problems which occur are when they change the course PM late in the course and add an academic essay. This isn"t allowed on other programmes, why is it here?» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Too easy to get high grades, atleast compared with Kf. I fought harder for a 3 on Kf than for a 5 here.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- This does not apply to all courses. But certainly the mandatory ones. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Kindergarten compared to bachelor. 5 in all courses with no effort and nothing new learned. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- To few concrete courses. Accounting was good, but besides that it seems like every course is more or less about the same.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Many courses were a bit too easy. Especially the exams were usually more similar to earlier exams, so studying old exams was far to effective to complete courses. This give an easy way to complete courses without a comprehensive knowledge in the course. Improve please!» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- most courses are repetition of bachelor courses, in english » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- That"s the main issue, I don"t feel I"ve learnt that much. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- There is a very large overlap between the bachelor and master at chalmers. I am very disappointed in having to spent a lot of time studying things I already know, instead of learning new things. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- It is very light and conceptual, they think we are children and they dont teach architecture, I am dissapointed, it is air and from now on I am not motivated working with sustainibility because it doesnt exist» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Både nivån och tempot är alldeles alldeles för lågt på Production. Efter att ha läst Z i tre år var det som att börja på gymnasiet igen. Om jag skulle ge zäta en 8a i svårighet och tempo ligger Production kanske på en väldigt svag 2a.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- I did have to retake the Vehicle Dynamics exam, but I feel "no real challenge" sums up my experience on the whole!» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- question is not quite clear. does it refer to my ability to complete courses or the content or administration?» (No opinion)
- I"m actually an exchange student this year, so it"s hard to have opinions on the courses in Sweden...» (No opinion)
- I have studied my first year abroad and have thus not attended any lectures at Chalmers within this master program yet.» (No opinion)
- No way to apply creativity and a different way of thinking. Very framed assignments. No time to read deeper and make personal research for things that are or may be useful in the future. In general, the structure of the courses and particular the assignments, it seems that are focusing more in quantity instead of quality, and this is also the way that are dealt by the students. » (No opinion)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.81

Goals and goal fulfilment

21. Have you seen the goals of the Masters programme (before now)?

Yes (more than 5 times)»		70		6%
Yes (between 2 and 5 times)»		329		30%
Yes (once)»		340		31%
No»		238		22%
No opinion»		96		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

22. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		10		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		211		19%
The goals are clear enough»		414		38%
The goals are very clear»		74		6%
No opinion»		354		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

23. Do you think the goals are reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		8		0%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		51		4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		630		59%
No, the goals are a bit high»		6		0%
No, the goals are set far too high»		3		0%
No opinion»		362		34%

Genomsnitt: 3.97

24. Do you think the goals are fulfilled within the programme?

No, not at all»		16		1%
To some extent»		139		13%
Almost»		261		24%
Yes, definitely»		258		24%
No opinion»		379		35%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Programme layout/structure/design

25. How satisfied are you with the programme curriculum?

Not at all»		23		2%
Not so satisfied»		83		7%
Neither/Nor»		151		14%
Satisfied»		607		56%
Very satisfied»		138		12%
No opinion»		69		6%

Genomsnitt: 3.89

26. Is there any subject/course that you would like to add into the programme?

Yes»		405		38%
No»		258		24%
No opinion»		380		36%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

- More mandatory courses during the second semester. » (?)
- the quarters thing is pretty bad, due to the really short period of time and the curriculum it is tried to be covered at the end we do not really learn anything but apply formulas. EHealth course is management course that shouldn"t be mandatory in an engineering programme.No technical info are given during the course. Many of the courses also give brief overviews of topics so you do not learn that much. The diagnostic imaging course should be split into two specialised CT and MRI courses as it is done to many unis across the world. » (?)
- - PDE - Mathematical Modeling - Turbulence Modeling - ...» (?)
- Structures» (?)
- I think coordinators and others should be more clear about the possibilities to chose other courses outside the programe. Focus should be for all students to create a MP most suitable for them and their interests. To be able to design your own MP, even outside the chosen MP, is a great chance. If the MPDSD should be possible to chose, the couses should be better adapted for engineerstudents.» (?)
- en mer teknisk kurs där man utvceklar rena produktionssystem (mer produktutvcekling)» (?)
- Statistics» (?)
- More basic knowledge about Ansys.» (?)
- Biology is absent from a Biomedical Program. Too much focus on Engineerign courses and not focus at all to biology/biochem courses.» (?)
- I think that the optional course I am currently studying, "Environmental aspects on logistics and transportation" should be integrated in the program, easily one of the best courses I have attended at Chalmers. » (?)
- CFD(computational fluid dynamics) or any fluid flow software could be usefull..also a flow physics course there were no such course in the programe at all..and generally more fluid or water related courses it has been many geo courses in the program» (?)
- More focus on the profile track - as it is now there are too many mandatory courses outside the profile track.» (Yes)
- Heat Transfer» (Yes)
- ProgramIng» (Yes)
- More practical things, labs. And more connection to the industry.» (Yes)
- Commercial CFD course. » (Yes)
- I would add some more hands-on work. Also, some more design work.» (Yes)
- the possibility of taking Rigid body dynamics befour Vehicle dynamics Advanced.» (Yes)
- Hands-on management courses» (Yes)
- Human language technologies» (Yes)
- More power system courses» (Yes)
- Advanced aerodynamics!» (Yes)
- More architectural details, more structure learning, more theory» (Yes)
- Big Data.» (Yes)
- More about how to build sustainable houses.» (Yes)
- Juridical aspects.» (Yes)
- psychology, sociology» (Yes)
- Generally there is lack of options, or the "wide course selection" is IT subjects. There should be more design-practice teaching, check HDK or Teknik Design and Arkitektur for inspiration (Why are these courses not offering shared courses, anyway?)» (Yes)
- Sustainable building. Even if there is, it doesn"t give any actual knowledge. More information about passive housing, materials, actual sustainable design and how technically works should be taught.» (Yes)
- More bio mimicry and nano. » (Yes)
- More alternatives in the prgramme selection» (Yes)
- See above - internship. It should be able to replace one semester with internship. Even if we get the internship without help from Chalmers. » (Yes)
- Adding courses to the semi-obligatory ones. I now had to take courses that did not fit my profile since I could not take courses from 2nd semester when returning from ERASMUS.» (Yes)
- Behaviour study or some environmental regulation and policy related subjects » (Yes)
- I would increase the number of semicompulsory courses to include maybe 8 courses insted of 6. Too much focus on Material physics» (Yes)
- More elective course on interface design - or more information about the possibilities to choose courses from the Interface Design master.» (Yes)
- Courses in fluid dynamics from Applied Mechanics master"s programme. E.g. Compressible flows, turbomachinery, gas turbine technology.» (Yes)
- Service design» (Yes)
- (Pure) Usability, Ergonomics courses» (Yes)
- more geotechnics anbd better road engineering courses» (Yes)
- Finance» (Yes)
- The master programme is too broad with no possibilities to widen the knowledge in a particular field of interest. For example, we only have ONE course in Geotechnics even tough there are plenty more to learn in this area. So instead of deepening my knowledge in Geotechnics I am forced to choose courses I am not interested in. I think this is unacceptable for a masterprogramme at Chalmers!» (Yes)
- Control courses» (Yes)
- More geotechnics or/and rock mechanics» (Yes)
- Tissue engineering» (Yes)
- Tobias Fredberg"s Strategy Creation and Change was one of the best courses I"ve taken, and it fits the MEI programme perfectly.» (Yes)
- It would be nice with more specific courses, dealing with one method or one application... something like that» (Yes)
- Advanced Road Vehicle Aerodynamics, Crashworthiness and Passive Safety» (Yes)
- A programming/algorithms course would be nice.» (Yes)
- Advanced analytical chemistry should be a compulsory choice and materials in medicine as well.» (Yes)
- make more courses madatory optional (alternativobligatoriska), there is no reason why some are and some are not. If there are courses at other masters programs that might be of interest make them more visible and electable.» (Yes)
- I would like to have some course in patent rights, economics, marketing and stuff like that. I think that overall Chalmers is very bad at informing its students about what happens after you"ve had an idea. We are taught how to think when we are to solve a problem or design something but never how to protect our ideas. In my opinion a general course about such things would give our education a little bit more of an edge, and also help people who might have ideas or maybe in the future is thinking of starting their own company. » (Yes)
- graphic design etc.» (Yes)
- The structure should be redesigned completely » (Yes)
- More energy realted courses, now there are fuel cells and energy related materials. Perhaos some solar cells or batteries. » (Yes)
- labview, or some more fluid dynamic courses with a good software. » (Yes)
- Possibly more applied mechanics courses.» (Yes)
- Business case course could be mandatory. Something about ethics and values? » (Yes)
- Courses related to CAD and/or Product Development» (Yes)
- Some course dealing with electrical measuremens» (Yes)
- Advanced Aerodynamics, Chassis Design, Passive Safety » (Yes)
- More courses with higher lever of knowledge about telecommunications, not other courses.» (Yes)
- Bioinformatics» (Yes)
- a microarray course» (Yes)
- More quantum physics and definitely Electrodynamics with the book by Jackson, this is very important!» (Yes)
- More courses on organization and general leadership courses» (Yes)
- Where is the economical perspective of sustainability!? the little macroeconomy in one of the selective courses are far from enough! » (Yes)
- Connections to industry!!!» (Yes)
- more strategic courses and more courses that are focused on applying analytical reasoning instead of learning frameworks like many of the courses are today.» (Yes)
- Perhaps some course aimed towards entrepreneurship within the chemical/process industry. I know there is an entire master program on biochemical entrepreneurship, but that is a big difference from the type of industry I"m interested in. Just during my masters thesis I have had a few interesting ideas.» (Yes)
- It would be useful to have some corporate finance course within MEI programme. Even though many of us would not be particularly interested in it, it would be useful knowledge.» (Yes)
- Some courses are a bit repetative I would rather have a bit more on project management methodologies and real life examples if application and use of tools.» (Yes)
- More electibles within hydrodynamics, not only structure.» (Yes)
- Some management courses » (Yes)
- Some non technical course would be good to have» (Yes)
- Plaxis. Fler tilgängliga geokurser.» (Yes)
- More applied geotechnics, more geotechnical modeling, e.g. plaxis, more CAD and GIS.» (Yes)
- More cell courses. feels like it is only the tissue engineering track which is an opption if you like to read much about cellellar mechanisms in the body.» (Yes)
- Immunology.» (Yes)
- 1)Building Physics 2)Sustainable Urban and Regional Planning 3)Leed, Breem, Green Star assesment training» (Yes)
- There are no courses we can choose which are linked to sustainability, which seems to counteract Chalmers general goals. Courses linked to Computational Earth Science would seem logical to me, since it is a highly complex subject. » (Yes)
- Stochastic processes, environmental complex systems courses.» (Yes)
- More hydraulics and hydraulic structures. » (Yes)
- programming courses» (Yes)
- More project courses like, Smart Grids» (Yes)
- a course about risk management in terms of how to deal with obstacles/problems during the course of a project (how to really face them)...maybe on the basis of case studies.» (Yes)
- Traffic planning, simulation. The programme"s name is fooling the student into beliving that infrastructure means road and not water pipes. » (Yes)
- more about how to build a sustainable building, more design courses.» (Yes)
- More interdisciplinary courses: Integrated flood risk and water management, Physical planning/ Urban theory Engineering in developing countries» (Yes)
- Industrial training» (Yes)
- interdisciplinary courses. doing projects with people from other programmes» (Yes)
- A course on category theory and possibly one a advanced type theory course would be nice (there is a basic course on type systems though).» (Yes)
- Hydrogeologi» (Yes)
- More practical construction courses» (Yes)
- More practical programming courses and less theory based on mathematical proofs.» (Yes)
- I would like the quantum informatics to be semi mandatory instead of some of the bad nanoscience course in the second period where we did not learn so much. Look at the course evaluations and pick the better courses or use more choices for them. In addition we need higher level of the physics so that we really learn some. » (Yes)
- Something that is useful for our career would be nice.» (Yes)
- More elective courses in logic or algorithms» (Yes)
- maybe some more on material science regarding cables and so.» (Yes)
- More real life application of the subjects and less achademic paper writing. I"d like to see a course dealing with applicable economics. The one we had taught accounting.» (Yes)
- Statistics, history» (Yes)
- railroad course, project management» (Yes)
- More road construction and geotechnical cources which are related to the working enviroment.» (Yes)
- Probabilistic graphical models would fit well I think.» (Yes)
- More quantitative market analysis, methods course for market analysis with some advanced statistics (conjoint analysis etc)» (Yes)
- More courses in traffic planning and analyzes » (Yes)
- Reintroducing Unix Internals with an updated curriculum would be nice. Embedded Systems programming or machine level programming in addition to Real-time systems would also have been nice. » (Yes)
- Theory of distributions, Topology, Multilinear algebra. All advanced math courses on GU» (Yes)
- A possibility to follow a low energy (condensed matter) and computational track similar to the Physics and Astronomy high energy (particle physics) and astronomy track. This track should be a progression and courses should have each other as prerequisites.» (Yes)
- A course in Finite Element Moethod would be nice. One which is geared towards application rather than theory, and is not in lp 2.» (Yes)
- More technical oriented courses» (Yes)
- Possibly some more computer oriented course.» (Yes)
- IT-innovation i.e. how to handle innovation within software development» (Yes)
- Antenna engineering» (Yes)
- It should be possible to choose courses from a larger range. For MPISC is courses like catalysis relevant, but not possible to choose for the common student today. Also more general courses such as economy could be good to actually be able to choose. » (Yes)
- More bio/medicin» (Yes)
- Yes in photoshop illustrator indesign (cs6) and v-ray.» (Yes)
- Idea evaluation» (Yes)
- Course about railways. Course about Public transports» (Yes)
- Photoshop/Illustrator course, becoming pros within these softwares would help us so much in the future. Psychology course. Web development course. » (Yes)
- rock mechanics » (Yes)
- Basic java and CSS» (Yes)
- More Traffic Coarses!!! » (Yes)
- 3d/animation related programme» (Yes)
- A programming course(C or java) » (Yes)
- the Design component only has one course maybe add more design courses» (Yes)
- Since almost everyone will become simulation engineers, it would probably be good with some course in numerics/high performance computing within the MP.» (Yes)
- Pde project course every year. » (Yes)
- Graphic Design Courses, with choices of platforms etc. » (Yes)
- Multimedia» (Yes)
- algorithms» (Yes)
- More road and railway maybe some city planning etc» (Yes)
- more geotechnics,» (Yes)
- High performance computing» (Yes)
- Compiling Functional Languages, Purely Functional Data Structures (or Functional Algorithm Design), Parallel Algorithms.» (Yes)
- Project Planning and control, Project support systems» (Yes)
- More courses within contract relationship but especially law.» (Yes)
- The entire programme should be analysed and someone should go over its viability. The course PMs should have to be controlled and verified before the course is put into action.» (Yes)
- More computer courses! I expect to do some "Scientific computing" .» (Yes)
- More option in Vehicle dynamic courses and Modelling and simulation» (Yes)
- Additional course in Purchasing » (Yes)
- A course in applied statistics.» (Yes)
- Behavioural sience» (Yes)
- Many good courses take place during spring and not that many during autumn. Would be nice with even more courses about energy efficiency in industry such ad industrial energy systems» (Yes)
- A Møre specific embedded course (microprocessors) before the embedded course ssy190 and in that course instead focus on the project more to get depth knowledge.» (Yes)
- I was expecting more towards marketing and purchasing than has been experience. Organizational behavior would be a good complement to the program. » (Yes)
- Testing courses should be mandatory.» (Yes)
- Web applications using ASP.NET MVC and C#, Software as a Service (constructing web architectures using MVC and a framework like Rails). In other words, more focus on the web, because software development is moving away from standalone desktop applications, and not all of us are going to work on security-critical internal accounting systems...» (Yes)
- Design with regard to earthquake» (Yes)
- More finance as this is required if one chooses to continue pursuing the entrepreneurial track» (Yes)
- Project management» (Yes)
- more architecture» (Yes)
- En kurs om selektivplanering gällande elnätet.» (Yes)
- Testing should be included (preferable already on the bachelor programme)» (Yes)
- Renewables!! A must...» (Yes)
- A separate course on adaptive control» (Yes)
- Human Computer Interaction, Image processing, Network Security» (Yes)
- courses about networking and communication» (Yes)
- I suggest two branches: 1) Structural engineering that is not coupled with a building material. How to tackle a problem, analyze and suggest a design. 2) Make studios, like in architecture, that focusses on one or two materials to get really specialized. C.f. project HALO but for structural engineering. And as a general comment: have a look on what ETH dose within the field.» (Yes)
- Power system protection» (Yes)
- Too much design. We want to implement the stuff we make!» (Yes)
- Something about concepts/subject apart from nuclear reactors, but still involves nucelar physics.» (Yes)
- more mandatory courses within the computer network area (the name of the master program is Computer Networks and has lack of computer network courses). There are only elective ones.» (Yes)
- Advanced Quantum field theory» (Yes)
- SW design, verification/validation» (Yes)
- Energy Economics» (Yes)
- biomedicin analytiker» (Yes)
- Statistics will be necessary for future jobs. » (Yes)
- More practical programming assignments» (Yes)
- More math. Espacially for the bachelor programme. Would like to have courses in Fourier transform etc.» (Yes)
- Solenergi, Termodynamik, CFD» (Yes)
- Generally more "Applied Mechanics" courses mixed with the applied/business thinking of Product Development» (Yes)
- lära, leda individ» (Yes)
- Industrial design» (Yes)
- Some more mathematical physics courses and group theory courses would be nice. However, no need to make them mandatory.» (Yes)
- Radiation protection and dosimetry» (Yes)
- More problem solving,cases where the actual solution is the core. » (Yes)
- There are a lot of people with computer science background in our programme that want to become better designers. There should be more options to get design knowledge like the course graphical interfaces. This course was useful but there should be more of those. Currently it"s mostly about methodology which is ok but even repeating to some extent while interface design and skills like sketching, color theory, compositions and so on are not available. It would also be nice to able to take some bachelor level design courses (Industrial/Product Design) but these are in Swedish only and require to be in the owner programme.» (Yes)
- Energy Aware Computing» (Yes)
- I wish to have had one more advanced course of Project Management or one course of Product Development to complement the Project Management course» (Yes)
- mobile computing» (Yes)
- Unfortunately I don"t have any suggestions for the moment.» (Yes)
- supply chain management» (Yes)
- Courses in Leadership and Management.» (Yes)
- There is a gap between the HW-way of thinking and the SW-way of thinking. Please help us build bridges. Show us how it is all connected. A course on system level, with guest lectures from the SW-side (Comm-programme?).» (Yes)
- A more traditional software architecture course.» (Yes)
- A second more advanced course in Fuel Cells.» (Yes)
- Construction methods» (Yes)
- Graphic Design and Sketching» (Yes)
- HW Component or systems in Communication» (Yes)
- Reprocessing Applied Core design course.» (Yes)
- I want to have more courses and therby more options to chose from. Right now I dont feel like I become anyting after my studies because the program is so wide. After the first semester you should be able to chose a "speciality" if you want to, geotechnics, water or road. » (Yes)
- CFD» (Yes)
- Railway Engineering Finite Element Method» (Yes)
- AUTOCAD and BIM. In chalmers bachelor program in Väg och Vatten the students have REALLy POOR knowlege about AUTOCAD!» (Yes)
- Power system protection, Automation of Complex Power Systems, » (Yes)
- Classical field theory (Advanced classical physics) Symmetry and group theory Functional analysis» (Yes)
- Some more entrepreneurial courses perhaps, or at least as elective courses » (Yes)
- Queuing Theory / Operations Management Leadership (Management / interaction of people, psychology etc.)» (Yes)
- More management course, more software engineering related elective course» (Yes)
- Lean» (Yes)
- Web programming» (Yes)
- A masters programme in automotive engineering should really have a mandatory course in powertrain and gears. A course in advanced aerodynamics with the use of ansa and suitable software such as star ccm+ » (Yes)
- A more environmentally oriented course» (Yes)
- Since I am interested in the "Image" track, I think it would be good to have more elective courses related to image processing. Usually those courses are in the Computer Science programme, such as Algorithms, Machine Learning, etc. For example, I was asked in a interview for a master"s thesis in a big company if I had some experience in Machine Learning. The master"s thesis was about medical image processing, and the company was Philips Research.» (Yes)
- Some information about that it could be good to read a course in basic computer networks. (ECUs, CAN-buses, safety critical (fail tolerant/safe), etc» (Yes)
- I don"t know specific cources but sometimes I think the amount of theory is a bit too low. » (Yes)
- More studio cources. All the theoretical cources within the master programme where lower quality than the studio cources. They did not reach the same level of academia and some where even a complete waste of time.» (Yes)
- We have a course called "Routing Technology" which corresponds to CCNA (Cisco Certified Network Associate). I suggest to add another course which corresponds to CCNP (Cisco Certified Network Professional) for students interested in this field.» (Yes)
- Mer trafik och överlag mer kurser att välja på, vi har ju för fan inget att välja på, helt bedrövligt!» (Yes)
- A course about the technological aspects of certain renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and wave power, and not just the system perspective.» (Yes)
- I would like to see a course which focuses on applying theoretical knowledge on practical experiments that does not involve only measurements. Something along the lines of building speakers.» (Yes)
- Design of foundations» (Yes)
- Databases» (Yes)
- More courses related to Software Engineering. Also courses about Software Design.» (Yes)
- Fluid Dynamics and/or fluid flow» (Yes)
- some of the labs and projects could be better connected to the specific course» (Yes)
- Concrete slabs on the ground. Bridge course.» (Yes)
- real Environmental Management Systems» (Yes)
- Python Programming.» (Yes)
- Basic Software Architecture, or similar.» (Yes)
- Sound Engineering» (Yes)
- computer vision course, microwave imaging course» (Yes)
- Control theory for vehicle dynamics» (Yes)
- Digital control , c++» (Yes)
- Project Management» (Yes)
- Operations management» (Yes)
- At the moment, there are courses like "Galaxies and observational cosmology", "Interstellar medium and star formation". We need individual courses instead of combining two large fields and studying them over just 7 weeks.» (Yes)
- More communication and get rid of many of the nonmandatory courses.» (Yes)
- we need a bigger possibility to choose courses that we are interested in but when they are mandatory in the program, that is difficult. For example, if I want to work with geotechnics - why on earth shall I have to take Drinking water engineering? That makes no sense. The course is really interesting of course but I mean that I don"t see the reason for having it as mandatory. Overall a greater number of courses to choose between is needed, in order to really fit your eduction to your interest. If I want to work with geology/geotekniks then I would need more courses about that and if I want to work with water I would need more courses about that. Now, the courses subjects are so different and mixed that it feel as I don"t become something, I just have a large mix of infrastructure things. There are several courses that are not really good and dont suit really, might be interesting but they dont fit to what I want to work with. If there were sevral courses to choose between, it would be much better. The program is called "infrastructure ... " but we only have one road-coarse! And nothing about railway! That is really bad. Overall, since the program doesn"t provide alternatives to the courses, they should aim at helping us taking relevant courses at other schools instead!» (Yes)
- Service Design, Strategic Design» (Yes)
- HVDC or FACTS courses(In detail)» (Yes)
- material-nano-course» (Yes)
- CATIA!» (Yes)
- A real project course. » (Yes)
- Interaction design » (Yes)
- I would prefer to have had more water management courses or environmental management courses. » (Yes)
- More courses in economy!!» (Yes)
- Computer Architecture as mandatory and Hardware description language that was removed» (Yes)
- Some course that includes psychological research methods. Could perhaps be incorporated into some existing course. I feel that our program could benefit from some more psychology perspectives from time to time. » (Yes)
- More building physics.» (Yes)
- More courses in geotechnics. Definitely.» (Yes)
- Advanced classical mechanics and group theory» (Yes)
- More technical and project management subjects. » (Yes)
- A more practical course with real engineering cases on various roles that our program offers us. There is too little that is taught that can be directly applicable. Would be nice to know you can become more than a CAD-designer when you graduate.» (Yes)
- CAD» (Yes)
- - BioMedical Image Analysis - Pattern recognition» (Yes)
- Programming courses in c» (Yes)
- More project-courses!» (Yes)
- Swedish Language course» (Yes)
- Brick masonry» (Yes)
- I remember thinking it, but not my suggestions...» (Yes)
- Industry Practice. Anatomy. Compulsory electrical/mechatronics course. » (Yes)
- CAD, economy and real estate» (Yes)
- Miljörätt or similar» (Yes)
- A separate course on Power System Protection » (Yes)
- Mor contact with other people than architecturestudent/teachers. We create for everyone, and we really need to learn how to communicate our visions and ideas, and how to formulate questions, to people that hasn"t been brainwashed with architectural terms and frases. We need to burst the bubble in some how! » (Yes)
- Elective courses should be more related to the mandatory courses.» (Yes)
- some medical oriented courses, more genetics/molecular biology courses » (Yes)
- sustainable power production and transport» (Yes)
- More courses within biophysics could be included into the semi- compulsory courses. Especialy "Biological physics", some of the computational biology courses, and/or "non-equillibrium processes in physics, chemistry and biology".» (Yes)
- More topics in the area of neural networks, artificial intelligence.» (Yes)
- "Develop systems and applications (Programming)" - This is sset as a goal although there is no specific programming course in the master program.» (Yes)
- The distribution of courses was a bit skewed, not giving many choices in some study periods and lots other study periods. Might be good to even out a bit» (Yes)
- Ability to choose more courses from the sustainable energy systems curriculum. Make more courses compulsory-elective.» (Yes)
- Strategic Management» (Yes)
- A lighter version of the software evolution project course. Mix of the agile course and SEP. select an open source project and a task and complete it in a team. » (Yes)
- More project courses. As it is now there is only one, in the second year. Would be nice to have another one during the spring the first year. » (Yes)
- I stronger focus towards project management certification. A course which has a certification moment from one of the big international firms would greatly raise the value of the education.» (Yes)
- Stochastic Optimization Algorithms» (Yes)
- More Intellectual properties course for the track ICM.» (Yes)
- I would like chalmers to add a course for master student to get familiar more with writing skills for different scientific texts like maste rthesis, reports, papers, posters and so on. Also in the same course they can teach us the how to lead a project within a time frame.» (Yes)
- Some more practical work. Add a lot of visits to companies!!!!! Other master programs do it why can"t ours?» (Yes)
- FEM, composite, fatigue, yacht-design» (Yes)
- Structural mechanics. And deep explanation about the theory of elasticity and theory of plasticity. Otherwise, you think you know but it is not always like that» (Yes)
- i"d like to see more variation i the span of topics» (Yes)
- Research methods or any courses that prepare students for a career in research» (Yes)
- More choices regarding construction courses, such as more timber and steel courses and more courses in general building design and construction » (Yes)
- more smaller courses, and I would definitely not extand the project courses from 15 to 22,5 p. the students will not do a lot more on this 7,p, the small courses beside the project courses are very important.» (Yes)
- More courses on what they do in the industry» (Yes)
- Signal processing» (Yes)
- Optoelectronics» (Yes)
- a course about networks that is not about algorithms» (Yes)
- Electrodynamics-geometric optics-advanced photonics-nonlinear optics-quantum mechanics-quantum optics-advanced optics-optical waveguide-numeical photonics and so on» (Yes)
- A structural dynamics course focused on structures (buildings/bridges) - not machines.» (Yes)
- More Traffic Engineering!» (Yes)
- Design wth Autodesk and analysis with ANSYS» (Yes)
- More Elective mandatory courses such as: -Ecological economics -Environmental law» (Yes)
- More geotechnics courses, and af greater span of selectable courses..» (Yes)
- Design of energy equipment should be compulsory» (Yes)
- More relevant MTS courses. As of now there is only one course with biotechnology in focus making the choice feel very limited. » (Yes)
- Economics» (Yes)
- More infrastructure courses about road and railroad engineering» (Yes)
- Mer inom affärssystem» (Yes)
- Ja gärna en inriktning mot elsystem, där fokus ligger på system tänkandet och inte på de elektriska komponenterna/detaljerna. » (Yes)
- The courses should be designed in such a way that student should learn completely about drives&power electronics / High voltage engineering / Renewable energy conversion. Atleast they should able to put a specialization in their degree.» (Yes)
- More strategy courses in general. Preferably more marketing, logistics» (Yes)
- Technology supporting project managers» (Yes)
- - As an optional course I added Natural product chemistry, which I felt could be very useful, especially within Biomaterials and tissue engineering, since it brings up and connects concepts of pharmaceuticals, their interaction with proteins, and their processing in different parts of the body, and concepts of toxicology. I would suggest making it a track course. - Adding a electible course on the health aspects, safety and environmental awareness concerning pharmaceuticals, medical implants and other bioactive products, as well as the important regulations of these could be a valuable resource for an engineer in the field. Possibly it could also contain other regulations for food and health as well.» (Yes)
- Visual presentation techniques - a course where you learn to make visual presentations (figures, reports, presentations, simple animations) of high quality using various computer software. » (Yes)
- contract management, human resource management, some (business, marketing, supply chain, control). » (Yes)
- More courses which involve smaller projects in groups.» (Yes)
- Electrodynamics» (Yes)
- interaction design, user experience design, marketing basics» (Yes)
- rock mechanics, environmental impact assessment, etc.» (Yes)
- Computer aided design using some 3D-modelling software» (Yes)
- More finance, more meical technology-oriented courses» (Yes)
- Human genetics/heredity. » (Yes)
- Term paper course crammed in during first fall term which perhaps was good training but skewed the study tempo» (Yes)
- More chemical engineering that we have not already studied!!! There is no point of repeating everything from the bachelor» (Yes)
- It would be good to have courses that specialize in certain technologies with more depth. Eg a course completely dedicated to solar, hydro, wind or geo-thermal power» (Yes)
- the teachers should have long experience as practical architects. We need to employ international teachers, the program is sleeping» (Yes)
- HR» (Yes)
- Practical FEM, more using commersial programmes» (Yes)
- more of real production engineering subjects specialized» (Yes)
- My major program is called Wireless, photonics and space engineering. What I want to learn is something on space, but it is not so much on space which means that I have to wait for the second year. From my point of view, this program should be better devided, maybe more specific areas.» (Yes)
- Valmöjlighet till Mekatronik och fler möjligheter att läsa projekt management» (Yes)
- Some more knowledge and hands on skills about energy conversion technologies like steam and gas turbines, otto/diesel engines, photo voltaic, wind turbines... » (Yes)
- verification courses» (Yes)
- Advanced Thermodynamics and Fluid dynamics. More courses pointing towards development of special machines (i.e. jet engine, gears) and not just consumer products.» (Yes)
- 1. Risk management for construction projects. 2. Building Information Modeling- managerial aspect and tools» (Yes)
- Ecodesign as a elective course» (Yes)
- "Economics"» (Yes)
- Microscopy would be interesting to choose but as it is an electable non-compulsory non-track related course it is hard to take it if you want to follow a track. Would be better to have all the electable non-compulsory non-track realted courses in the autumn so that 2nd year students can take them when all track courses already have been taken. » (Yes)
- Multivariable digital control» (Yes)
- Linear Programming» (Yes)
- UML or Website courses» (Yes)
- Computer vision» (Yes)
- Courses including Software tools for Logistics, Data analysis and Operational research. » (Yes)
- More scientific courses and exposure to building technology» (Yes)
- Software Testing and Verification» (Yes)
- There should be a mandatory course in dev. processes, not just the agile project. I don"t think I"ve learned enough about software architecture - the "Advanced Software Architecture" course could be more aptly referred to as "Embedded System Analysis".» (Yes)
- materials» (Yes)
- More geotechnical courses (like the computer programme Plaxis) and more infrastructual courses.» (Yes)
- more formal leadership training.» (Yes)
- Artificial Neural Networks» (Yes)
- Technical knowledge concerning wood» (Yes)
- Next generation sequencing techniques» (Yes)
- FEM modelling and stress analysis with a materials point of view» (Yes)
- arduino» (Yes)
- I would like more courses in general to choose between. » (Yes)
- En kurs som kopplar samman Wave-loads och structure» (Yes)
- Some course can allow students do more implemented project and with full covering of assistance of teacher» (Yes)
- more Economics based courses since Economics is in the title of the MSc program» (Yes)
- Active safety should be part but emphasize its connection towards control theory and wireless communication but still contain behavioral analysis and confounding factors.» (Yes)
- some entrepeneur course would be good. Also: divide branding course into two courses - it was too intense!» (Yes)
- Thermodynamics shoul be included. There are some courses where the concept has been used, but a separate course will enhance the individual knowledge.» (Yes)
- Parallell Computing Course» (Yes)
- (Företags)ekonomi. » (Yes)
- Routing Technology with the option to obtain CCNP and few other certifications» (Yes)
- Risk/ uncertatinty management, financial investment, presentations skills,Change management, quality management,more workshops and smaller groups for the project works(max 2-3 persons instead as today 4-5).» (Yes)
- Project planning of renewable energy system. (came up with the title) Wind power course Solar cell and thermal energy » (Yes)
- Extend the idea evaluation and feasibility studies course. More useful than other courses for the final project year.» (Yes)
- Lean Production! Many that I have spoken to feel th same way as I. At the QOM programme you are expected to know about it throughout many courses, even though many have never read that much about it before.» (Yes)
- More nano-specific courses and maybe a course in metallurgy» (Yes)
- Project oriented courses » (Yes)
- More Hybrid technology!» (Yes)
- more soil mechanics and geotechnics» (Yes)
- More generally, some courses could perhaps be "straightened up" a bit, some courses might work better if they were more focused etc.» (Yes)
- More integrated biology/ecology and how that can affect planning» (Yes)
- More practical electronics, Prosthetic devices» (Yes)
- Aerodynamics» (Yes)
- I would like to have more courses in the food and health area.» (Yes)
- GD&T is a used exclusively in the real world, yet no one teaches it.» (Yes)
- More projects» (Yes)
- Economy, management, law.» (Yes)
- I think there should be a little more choices in lp 4. Thre are no courses to choose basically or is it intended that way? maybe move one/several courses.» (Yes)
- Focus more on design and interfaces and prototyping. How to pitch projects will be very valuable. and of course much less methodology. Content of some courses overlaps with some other. eg. Mehtods of Interaction Analysis and HCD. More real world challenges.» (Yes)
- Project management » (Yes)
- Railway courses, More geotechnics, More traffic» (Yes)
- More nanotechnology! Perhaps have more collaboration with the physics department.» (Yes)
- Some courses in Complex Adaptive Systems and Math Engineering. Like: Artificial Neural Networks, Foundations of probability theory etc. Maybe multivariate calculus as a course (or as prerequisite)» (Yes)
- Att leadership kursen blir obligatorisk eller att en del av den är obligatorisk under kandidaten. Bästa kursen, hjälper en att reflektera över sin utbildning och hur man kan använda sin kunskap på bästa sätt» (Yes)
- Sustainable energy futures (with Christian azar)» (Yes)
- Earlier basic programming courses for students who do not have this background, to have at least that as common ground between students.» (Yes)
- More courses in computer networks.» (Yes)
- practical programme» (Yes)
- Interaction Design» (Yes)
- hydraulic- hydrology- more concentrated courses on water or geotechnic» (Yes)
- There are many directions that student from Software Engineering program can chose to develop further. I think this program should give students the opportunities to go different directions. For example I feel there is a lack of computer security course in this program.» (Yes)
- The course Failure Analysis should be moved to the second year.» (No)
- Great selection of courses, good job! Good thing you added parallel functional programming.» (No)
- I do not want to add any courses! As it is now there are 15hp of elective courses, which was extremely useful for me because i needed to study 22,5hp extra to get my "Civilingenjörsexamen". These elective courses should therefore definitely be kept!» (No)
- keep the possibility to choose courses, but leave the first compulsory (good for group dynamics)» (No)
- The programme courses are good but the quality of the electable courses are quite poor.» (No opinion)
- I wish international exchanges would work better with the program. As it is now, you can only [tillgodoräkna] very few of them, which makes the incentives for going abroad very low. » (No opinion)
- There are many interesting courses but cannot be taken because of the time limitation. Some times I like more than two courses in a study period.» (No opinion)
- I have studied my first year abroad and have thus not attended any lectures at Chalmers within this master program yet.» (No opinion)
- A lot of interesting courses are available, however a lot of them collide in the block schedule.» (No opinion)
- cannot find the program goals via the link provided..» (No opinion)
- more lectures» (No opinion)
- The program doesn"t exist anymore so whatever. I choose between security and networks for master program so I think its a good decision they merged those two.» (No opinion)

27. Are there any courses that you think should be heavily revised (or even removed) from the programme?

Yes (1 to 2)»		454		42%
Yes (3 to 4)»		92		8%
Yes more than 5»		17		1%
No»		329		30%
No opinion»		171		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- The courses has a tendency to overlap eachother quit a bit. After the first introduction coarse there are no more challange. Except Idas course.» (?)
- Advanced Software Architecture (revise)» (?)
- Projektkursen. material modellering. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- the safety course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea evaluation. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- No classes Spring final year of masters» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Too many mandatory courses. Mathematical modeling should definitely be removed since it was way too late in my education for that kind of course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Local context is a very nice course, but what we learn is not so much for a master programme level» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fewer mandatory courses » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Systems Analysis Environmental Impact Assessment» (Yes (1 to 2))
- applied signal processing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The first "sutainable-course"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Graphical interfaces» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IPR010 was a waste of time. as far as i understand, anybody getting admitted to the program has already studied project management!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Innovation Seminar Course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban metabolism» (Yes (1 to 2))
- dependable computer system has an exam that is all about memorizing stuff, and you can bring the formulas at the exam just if you buy the book, otherwise you need to learn them.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 6 compulsory courses is enough» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Creating new business did not seem to fit that well. I think it was too much of an entrepreneurial startup focus. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanoscience should be removed or heavily revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Idea Evaluation course has so much potential but has to be restructured. The biggest problem was the involvment of Boo Edgar, he only confused the students and has a very arrogant attitude towards constructive feedback. He is a diva.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering of Automotive Systems » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The machine learning course should definitely not be removed but it would need a new teacher and the course should be remade. Great subject, bad course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Systems biology could be a very useful course but today if revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Soft Matter Physics and Modern Imaging were comparatively unrewarding courses and should be done away with.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Analysera Lärande needs heavy revision and a clearer goal» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The method course is way to late and has no real place in a master programme. If a student have not learned how to conduct a thesis before the masters thesis there is something wrong in the bachelor programme.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Embedded System Design course gave a too high workload if you happened to be paired with a student that did not have skills in VHDL.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine economics needs to raise the bar. Not tough enough!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- One course was really bad (TDA956), but I was happy with all the other ones.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that it is problematic to have semi-compulsory courses in the second year. This makes both 60 credit thesis work and studies abroad harder to fit into the program. Given that most thesis conducted by students are 60 credits this is problematic. At least the course in modern imaging also are not of very high quality, which makes it seem a waste of time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I feel like Computational Biology 1 is heavily interconnected to Dynamical Systems and that even though the content/approach in both courses aren"t exactly the same, some elementary things such as linear stability analysis wouldn"t have to be part of the Comp. Bio. course if Dyn. Sys. was placed first. The course content of Comp. Bio. could then be revised to something more memorable.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses on distributed systems I and II should be revised and, especially the first course should put more focus on laborations with different algorithms, not just an exam with random questions on algorithms which only requires a good memory, not understanding. Also, the lecture slides were bad for both courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I love condensed matter physics and I think that the course was interesting. But I think it should be 1. Better teached, very hard to understand now. 2. A slight step towards more applications, materials and a little less advanced quantum theory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Operating Systems - new professor, Computer Networks - The course structure and teaching staff» (Yes (1 to 2))
- organizational project management (removed) strategic management (revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove: Urban Metabolism. Water resources and environment. Revise: Urban traffic planning, road engineering.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction Governance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- nanoscience» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TEK190, we learn NOTHING useful, unless we want to take phd after. It is a pure waste of time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Many of the courses may prove to be quite usefull later on in working life, but I doubt many will deal with organizational decisions directly after graduating for instance. Maybe revise some of the courses to be closer to what employers actually find useful for a new graduate.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CFD should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- project in applied mechanics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Models of Computation, at least the how the course is held.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- yes, the strategy something something course in lp3 is too vague and similar to other courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Foundations of probability theory (I suppose it"s more about the lectures rather than the course), Mathematical Modelling» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed matter physics is very theoretical and contains absolutely nothing about applications. This should be changed!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks. First it just repeats stuff we already know for like 5 weeks and on the end they introduce self*-algorithms that was complex and boring.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that the "eHealth" course should not be mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- internal combustion engines» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nordic Architecture Advanced Theory and Methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Creating New Business and the projects we conducted in that course should be revised heavily. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Economics of Innovation Research Design and Methods Both these contains way to much information.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban metabolism» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Cellulose technology, paper technology are useless courses. Too much theory that you can find anywhere in case you need it in some moment.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Engineering Using Formal Methods could be improved. The tools and programming languages we used do not feel like things you would use in either the industry or in research.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic for CS. I have completed my master and never found use for its content, yet it is mandatory. I would suggest making it optional.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Leadership » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nordic architecture should be selective, not mandatory! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- the course in modeling which is mandatory Drinkingwater should not be mandatory » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Masters thesis primarily» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks,» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Systems biology was not a good course and I don"t think I learned anything new from it. I don"t see the point of the Industrial biotechnology course as we studied Bioreaction engineering in the bachelor programme. This shouldn"t be a compulsory course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and Problem Solving.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Aesthetics of Interaction» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Multimedia and video communications» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Too much report writing without proper feedback in many courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Graphics interface? Maybe.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle Dynamics- Basic , Automotive systems- too general did not really learn anything new. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The seminar course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TDA297 Distributed systems, advanced course, is not very good. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks, seriously 100% repetition from the bachelor program. Make it a prerequisite and make it more advanced.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Knowledge and learning in Projects Strategic Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project pre-study and implementation courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- creating new business is an interesting subject but the course was very bad» (Yes (1 to 2))
- production project-prestudy, should it really have to be mandatory?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PEWD, PRE-STUDY» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design....» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Even if the lean production isn"t mandatory, there is not much else to choose in between and hence, very much similar to the course in production flow just the period before. Not a good structure of these two course, should be revised! Probably, they see it as a favor to let us pass by different hand-ins and without exam but pretty much everyone do the exam and then the high pressure during the period in unnecessary! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine transportation » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that the "mechatronics in embedded systems" course package should be more specified. Feels like it includes some random courses, which is not for any help. Why"s "Robotics and manufacturing automation" included as an example? it did not feel as it should be included» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the "Materials performance" and "Heat and moisture engineering" courses were redundant, at least for students coming from VoV at Chalmers, having taken similar courses at bachelor level, albeit in another language. I think they should of course still be offered, but not compulsory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- So far: Model-driven engineering: seems pretty weak compared to other courses Advanced software architecture: the assignment part should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- software evolution project - more evolution - including more legacy stuff» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The model driven engineering is too tool centered and not of masters material. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture engineering, Material Performance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- industrial energy systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design as it were 2012 suffered issues and needs to be revised to some extent. Embedded Control Systems of 2012 was extremely bad. After taking the course (i Got grade 5) I still cant really say what it was about. The topics varied, it did not follow the state course curriculum and felt non relevant.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced topics in Computer systems and networks - it was too vague.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Term Paper and Seminars» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geotechnics (revise) Structural dynamics (revise) (have not taken this course yet, but I read about it). » (Yes (1 to 2))
- revised but not removed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced topics in computer systems and networks. Computer Networks.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Response to Sound and Vibration» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and Simulation, and Mechatronic Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The nuclear chemisty at the beginning should be revised, but absolutely not removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks and Advanced Computer Networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design, embedded control systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and Moisture Engineering, Material Performance.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Response to Sound and Vibration was unfortunately a bit unorganized. We got no feedback from the grades, no explanations at all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- sw evolution project, SPLE» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Artificial Neural Networks course needs to be updated, it is teaching very old material with no mention of recent developments.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The project course is great but needs to have appropriate facilities, which it does not have today.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- There are many courses have mathematics analysis in a compulsory courses or compulsory elective courses , so I think it is better to be one or maximum two, and spent the rest time with courses related with chemistry or biology science. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Service Contract Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable electric power systems - make it better.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Finite Element Methods (specially Applications) seems more like it is made for Mechanical Engineering and ot for us. Could be done more applicable for civil engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MTF072 CFD: better lecture notes and more structured lectures» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production logistics (optional)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Operating Systems EDA092» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Mechatronics Design course was far too easy. In retrospect, I should have chosen the Composite Mechanics course... Also, the Product Planning course"s lecturer/examiner made us wait until the midst of LP4 for feedback in the form of grades (even though the course took place in LP2).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and Simulation Mechatronic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove the mandatory course starting with RRY from MPPAS. You know which one it is. I don"t think any student is happy with this. Make it non-mandatory, please.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Economy, there is no point for students to learn accounting.. especielly when the course is through a book that american regulations is used. There is of no value that the student can do abc-calculation at a exam as today company"s use programs in the economy departments.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Hög belastning på Term Paper kursen» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable energy futures - should be removed. Nuclear chemistry and applied nuclear chemistry - could be less in nuclear chemistry and more in applied nuclear chemistry. Today it is like 90/10 in work load between the courses » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production Systems or Pre-study.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Methods of Interaction Analysis is not very useful and I heard the same about human centered design. I would like to see a design course instead. The interface design track seems to have not enough options.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna Engineering! I know that it has recieved alot of money for improvements earlier but it could be even better...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- term paper and physical distrubution» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Strucural dynamic are not good. I really do not like power point presentations!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TDA956 needs to be revised from scratch. DAT105 also needs some revision.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- heat and moisture maybe geotechnics » (Yes (1 to 2))
- There is strong repetition of the basic communication elements in the first semester due to overlap of those courses with other programs.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronics Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The compulsory sustainable course in the architecture master is repetition for bachelors from Chalmers. So is the nordic arhitecture course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- platform and modularization» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk management and safety (the assignments were frustrating, there were some good guest lecturers but could be more aligned with the course) Pollution prevention: More structure, assignments and projects. Content of the course was good. CFD: Was too heavy, could be split into two.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Scientific visualization" This course was way to basic for a MP. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structural dynamics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The computer security and network security course is very simular, after studying much for the first course you do not realy need to do so much in the other. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- DIEE - Design of industrial energy equipment (Strange structure in course and approach towards students if we are supposed to learn in an efficient way) Political instruments - (Bad teaching , would have learned 3 times the knowledge i received if it would have been structured/performing as other courses)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project course, pre-study and the project need to be re-organized» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Much material in DIEE and IES is repetition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Housing inventions Design Tools» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Energy futures. It is frankly insulting to take this course for the chemical engineers since they have already taken so many courses in environment and etc....» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Image analysis-revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physics of nuclear reactors» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Water Resources and Environment BOM150 and Geographical Information Systems VVT105 need to be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Design Systems" introduces systems thinking, which is a good aim, but after taking the course I still have no clear idea on how to apply systems thinking to the design process. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power electronics devices and applications (brush the content, add important and remove unimportant, leave some topics, like HVDC, for other courses)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design of flexible and modular automation systems Production project - pre-study» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Real time systems (lab assignment that is more like the theory part). Advanced topics (very good thought but very bad execution).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material mechanics. Needs to be straighen out. The administration of the course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Tools course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering of Automotive Systems. The level was very low.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise laborations in Distributed systems and Distributed systems advanced.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth shouldn"t be a compulsory course (it should be elective).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in building materials was rather boring. I don"t really know how it can be made more interesting, but it can be hard to listen to long presentations with power point slides that are full of information. The course in structural dynamics could have been more adapted to buildings. It was hard to see how we can use the methods in reality.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Embedded control systems (Spring 2012).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving kursen var kass, har inte hört någon säga något bra om den, kass uppbyggnad osv! » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heating, ventilation and air conditioning should be made elective, it doesn"t really fit in with the other courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Development of Silent Products" is to this day the most useless course I have had during my time in Chalmers. I would be beneficial to everyone if the course was removed and replaced by something else. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think that research methodology should be revised. It feels like almost everything in that course is repetitions from other courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geotechnics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction governance should be removed or heavily revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model-based Testing is a course which lacks a clear focus. 70% of the content is related to testing in general and not about model-based testing.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Cellulose Technology and Biorefinery» (Yes (1 to 2))
- mechatronic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- modelling and simulation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think "Heat and moisture" should be reorganized a bit, besides the already great job going on there. Also, "Structural dynamics" was an very interesting-great course, but if it could be linked a bit more to the content of civil engineering would be even better. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- MDE, low quality course. Should not be mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied nuclear chemistry, at least the way it was taught with G Skarnemark» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some of the compulsory courses could be made optional.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer graphics does not fit into the information visualization track of the master.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model-based engineering has to be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fundamentals of photonics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software architechture, software product line» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The ergonomics course should be altered!!!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- tycker att elnätskurserna har haft problem. de borde kolla på hur andra universitet som t ex MIT undervisar kurserna» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material, and physical ergonomics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban metabolism» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The workload in managing org in the cons.ind. should be valued the double, due to the heavy workload!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical systems, Complex system seminar» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and simulation!!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- PPU080 Advanced computer aided design Theoretical part was not useful nor practical at all, and exam didn"t support understanding, just repetitive memory. The practical drawing part was very good, and I feel the full focus should have been on that and more time spent there. It the theoretical part is to be continued, the teaching method should be improved - very dull lectures, which where hard to follow. Possibly alternative software, such as SolidWorks could be introduced, as smaller companies you might work for later do not afford to use Catia. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The PLM-course in the second year, it was not good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The organization of the Master theses. You have to have the dates for handing in the report when you START the corse not the same day you hand it in. As happened to me. One of you"re tasks is to organize youre time, but that is not possible if you don´,t get the limitations(dates for handing in and presenting). This will also reduce the stress on the students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligense needs to be looked at. Good courses, but poor execution.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Materials Performance should use the course litterature more thoroughly and present ALL materials therein» (Yes (1 to 2))
- It has already happened. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Knowledge and learning in project organisations. Design processes and management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The management courses are also good but there should be more lectures and more interaction with the lecturers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physics of Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Chemistry should be heavily revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and simulation should have much more on simulation, specially with modelica. The project should be removed alternatively make it possible to choose between several project courses related to the content of the program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Cfd and Fem » (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Models of computation" was not very useful, it was a little bit interesting, but not useful at all.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power electronics courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- HCD was crap» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Material performance need to change the structure in order improve the learning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Systems Biology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC engineering, Industrial Energy Systems should be at least moved from compulsory to semi-compulsory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in Sustainable electric power systems needs to be reworked. It was very interesting but it needs some work to be good. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering needs to be heavily remade or removed. The topic fits the program but the course itself did not. It contained far too much repetition to be good. We do not need to spend two weeks learning what a heat pump is when we in a parallel course learned how to design them. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fundamentals of photonics. Either make it totally different or remove it. Too basic and unclear» (Yes (1 to 2))
- discrete event systems. not a very useful course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Managerial Economics which is a bit poorly designed in my opinion. It"s an easy course but students gain little from it» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Software Architecture should focus more on software solutions instead of hardware. Less focus on executable modeling tools. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The revised the course after I took it since there was a lot of complaints for it. Was a lot better the year after what i heard. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Protein engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Multiphase flow» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building physics Material performance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production Flow Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Substainable electric Power systems.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- idea evaluation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model-Driven Engineering is too poorly organized to be a mandatory course at a master program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MTT046 Metal processing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The knowledge and learning in organizations course should be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- "nordic architecture" (yr 4) felt like it was only meant for exchange students, but for some reasons it was compulsory for swedish students as well. workshop (yr 3): it"s a great idea to let students try making furniture. it"s a bad idea allowing 15 people doing so, while the rest have to do a "traffic workshop".» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses are to much repetative if you took your bachellor at CTH» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Both mandatory materials courses in the first semester, "heat and moisture" and "material performance", are both really bad when it comes to layout, structure and teaching. The later use of them is very questionable, it would have been better to have courses regarding have building materials behave in constructions and more general about heat and moisture design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Customer Relationships in reading period 4. Badly defined what is required of the students. I would not suggest to remove it but more clearly state what the course is about.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- nordic architecture » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ergonomics design for all» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The cad course should not have a written exam, it seem somewhat forced and does not really make sense » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Distributed Systems need to be revised. The assignments are WAY too big for example.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanoscience» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would really like to see Tissue engineering merged into one single course that spans over LP4&5 to make things more coherent and smooth for the students. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban metabolism» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied mechatronics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- flum femen behövdes väll inte ?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Production flow - extremely uninteresting course, if left more broad focus, not only Volvo Freight transport system - some parts are interesteing, but in general too simple and weird course OPC and CRM - both might be good in the program but could have been made much more interesting than they are today» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Knowledge and learning was a very weak course, as well as lectures on International projects.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in Foundations of Microwave Engineering is too wide, it should be divided into two courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering » (Yes (1 to 2))
- "evolutionary genomics BIO442" at GU as an elective course like "protein engineering" is. This course is based on statistics and systems biology as well as new theory about genetics and opulation genomics. http://www.utbildning.gu.se/kurser/kurs_information/?courseId=BIO442» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The first course about sustainibility, the general one is totally empy. I didnt learn anything and it didnt presented one single solution, just problems that everybody knows» (Yes (1 to 2))
- FEM Structures and Structural dynamics should be replaced by more commersial courses» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Virtual Process planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design is very messy and needs to be sorted out. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- industrial biotechnology is only aimed at chalmers B.Sc. students and expects all students to understand very specific things which only chalmers b.sc. students know» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MDE» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechanical performance of engineering materials and Advanced metal forming welding and casting» (Yes (1 to 2))
- advanced analytical chmistry. Not advanced at all!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Advanced Theory and Methodology should be heavily revised. I had no use of this course in the preparation to start my thesis and regret taking it.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- System biology Analytical Chemistry (good content, it is how the information is handled that needs to be revised. no course homepage etc)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the systems biology course is really bad» (Yes (1 to 2))
- It"s strange to have a course about the theory behind artificial neural networks, before playing with them in practice. In my opinion theory should come second, in cases where there are practical problems. Otherwise you get no curiosity from trying to improve or understand them, rather you get bogged down in things you have no experience of, and no general picture of, which is killing the enjoyment at the implementation level. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I was very fascinated by systems biology before I started the master but the course was very unstructured and made my interest die quickly. However, the exercises were good due to Tobias, who was very enthusiastic and pedagogic. Some kind of simulation project (like in industrial biotechnology but easier)would have been interesting as simulations are such a big part of systems biology.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Miljökursen» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The HVAC course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- project management , software prodcut line engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Creating New business need to be heavily revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nordic architecture should be optional.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Impact Biomechanics, Engineering of Automotive Systems » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Advanced Distributed Systems course is nowhere near as well planned as the basic course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Applied Industrial Ecology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Term Paper and Seminars"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design, Processes and Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Fem basics and structures could be revised. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- There have been a lot of complaints about MDE and SPLE. I think most students do not see the point of these technologies and get hung up on the immature tools.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Changes in the distribution of time. Sometimes it has been very much to do, and sometimes not so much at all. A more even distribution of the content of the courses could be helpful.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DIEE, AST» (Yes (1 to 2))
- LCA class should be updated!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Första läsperiodens kurser måste upp på mastersnivå. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Policy Instruments should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Virtual process planning was really really bad!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- branding course needs to be changed» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Industrial Energy System is the best course, but the materials/knowlede is hard to cover in 7 weeks. The materials should not be lesssen but the time must be increased. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed system, advanced topics and advanced course. Need to do something about those.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physical ergonomics need revision, too much repetition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Organizational behavior has a quite weird structure and international business relationship is too simple» (Yes (1 to 2))
- International business relationships» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Surface engineering feels too general» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea evaluation had a supreme concept based on three evaluation reports. This was great. The exam on the other hand treated sustainability extensively. It was just ridiculous to run the content of the course on one purpose whereas the exam was another one. I do not claim that sustainability should be taken from the course. But as it looks for now the course focus is according to the exam a matter of business and environmental sustainability, and minor on evaluation: put the focus to evaluation and develop that further, focus the sustainability to the evaluation aspect, cut the rest.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban Metabolism» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The prestudy course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed Matter Physics is a course containing interesting physics but I believe it should be better conducted, as it feels one does not get a good feeling of the subject, and it would be nice to understand some concepts of the course in a more intuitive way.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction Governance Environmental Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Artificial intelligence. This course was, when I took it, in my opinion pointless. All I learnt was to write essays, seeing as that took 80-90% of the time each week. It would be better if they actually taught us something useful instead of forcing us to write essay after essay, week after week. Unless this course doesn"t change I do not see any reason of forcing all students of the CSALL masters programme to take this course as it just a waste of their time.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction Governance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ehealth» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Risk Management needs to be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced CAD, that was held last autumn. The lectures seemed to make no sense at all and did not cooperate with the excersises. The excersises were how ever good. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering of Automotive Systems. 90% was so ridiculously basic, if you didn"t know the material, you had no right signing up for a MASTERS in automotive engineering! ICE Advanced was also very shallow. I looked at a bunch of results from R&D regarding injector sprays, but learned nothing of how to design an engine. I bet most people don"t know that pistons should be barreled to account for asymmetric thermal expansion - something I learned in my Bachelor"s engines class.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- DAT110» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Aethetics of Interaction, Interaction of Social Media should be defenitely revised. Methods of Interaction. Human Center Design didn"t bring any knowledge even if it looked interesting at the beginning. It could be wiped.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Remove Urban Metabolism and give us a choice if we want to be a Water or and Geo engineer.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic in Computer Science - Way to easy. Definitely bachelor level.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I haven"t taken the course, but from what I heard the social media course may need a makeover to provide students with skills and information that can be of more practical use.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Leadership and Quality Management (I hear it"s already been modified, don"t know if it"s better now)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Design and Communication Tools course was a bit messy.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introduction course, the safety course, the introduction course to vehicle dynamics. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Some lecturers are really not so good, hence their courses are bad as well.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Especially Project Management» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Modern imaging: could be more advanced. Soft matter: examination does not match teaching, teaching and literature is simplistic whereas exams seems to match goals.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Systems biology Advanced analytical chemistry Industrial biotechnology they are all good in some ways but they should not be mandatory!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Artificial neural networks- Computational Biology (All courses which hold by Bernhard mehling) - Dynamical systems - Simulation of complex systems and seminars » (Yes (3 to 4))
- If you´,re not interested of the safety courses it would be nice to make them avalible but not mandytory so you could adapt the course plan for your self better. plus add more and better courses for the first semester in the second year. i.e. hands on applications or more towards dynamics/engines.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Image Analysis: It belongs to the Biomedical Engineering Master and its content is irrelevant to the Communication Engineering Master. Same for, Computer Networks, Circuit Design etc.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced Form 1, Advanced Form 2, Ergonomics design for all, IDE-project» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Repetition of some of the courses! Move some of the courses to be better suited in year 2 instead of year 1, the mandatory courses in year 1 was very depressing, negative and seems sto be lacking understanding of the society and engineering parts..» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Göran Lindahls courses has had a lack of structure and administration.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Water recourses, modelling and problemsolveing, drinkingwater, Gis» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I have not liked any of the manditory courses. I don"t feel it is something i will use in the future and i think they should not be manditory. it just feels like a waste of time.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1) Design and planning for social inclusion and Planning and Design for Sustainable Development in a Local Context should be merge in only one. (22.5 cr) 2)Architectural Heritage and Urban Transformation and Architectural conservation and transformation should merge in only one course. (7.5cr) 3)Solar Decathlon should be an stand alone course out of the master and accross Chalmers schools, so will be more accessible for other carrers to apply. This course need many different backgrounds. (15cr) » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Applied signal processing, » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Computer networks, Distributed systems, Distributed Systems Advanced, Computer security, Network Security» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The structure of the Turbomachinery and the Gas turbine technology courses is not good. The workload in the CFD course is quite heavy, especially since the Structural Dynamics course running during the same time also is quite heavy. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Urban Metabolism Modelling and Problem solving More focus on hydraulics in the water engineering courses or create separate hydraulic courses » (Yes (3 to 4))
- probably the ones that i didn"t take» (Yes (3 to 4))
- the distributed systems courses, Computer systems and networks, operatingsystems, advanced topics» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Systems Analysis, Environmental Management» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Urban traffick planning (remade), have possibilities in the first term the first year and remove urban metabolism (if we want to study enviroment we can choose the enviroment programme instead)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Operating Systems needs to be modernized. Distributed Systems was also rather bad when I took it, but a new teacher is giving the course now, and I understand that it is much better now. "Advanced topics in computer systems and networks" was too much repetition of other courses, and not enough advanced topics or research preparation. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- There are too many other semi compulsary courses that have students from too many different backgrounds that are on a high school physics level (e.g. modern imaging, surface and nano physics).» (Yes (3 to 4))
- i think that these course are already revised from when i took them» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Computational biology 1 and 2 Dynamical Systems» (Yes (3 to 4))
- wastewater most be revised, modeling revieced. urban metabolism removed» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Materials performance and Heat and moisture engingeering, these are by far the worst courses I have taken during my time at Chalmers. Also, the teachers are not interesed in improving the courses. Geotechnics was not very good, low standards.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Om man hade läst virtuell produktion och industriell produktion och organistaion innan, kändes både production systems och production management onödiga. Projektkursen (project course pre-study) behöver struktureras om. kändes bara som ytterligare ett IKOT/kandidat-arbete. Det var för mycket fokus på HUR man driver projekt istället för att göra det. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Building material sciences can be removed. We did the same lab"s as in the basic course in the BSc-program (Byggnadsmaterial) - "it can be fun for the international students". They did not think it was fun, nor did we who conducted the lab a second time with the twist that it had to be done in english. Heat and moisture and the 2nd concrete course needs revisions.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced Software Engineering was a disappointment, too disconnected from real life, AADL-part a total waste of time. Lectures in Model Drive Software Development were very uneven in quality. Project Management was a great course overall, but amazed that a teacher who consistently receives dismal assessments (Per) is allowed to stay on. Agile Development Processes has too little teacher supervision.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- 1.Advanced distributed systems. This course need to be heavily revised. I am wondering why it is still the same many years. Please do something, the course topics, the labs, the goals are very interesting but the lectures are BAD BAD BAD. The issue is in the prof himself and I am sorry to say that. Please refer to te course evaluation of this course. 2.Computer networking (self stabilization topic only) 3. Parallel and distributed real time systems (OP completness topic only)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Systemet med "semiobligatoriska kurser" är bara ett sätt att gå runt reglerna för hur många poäng som ska vara valbara, och för att utrycka sig internationellt är det "pure BS". Antingen kan ni ta bort möjligheten till att ha valbara poäng på masternivå eller så får ni hålla er till de reglerna som finns. Att uppfinna kompromisser för att tänja på reglerna skapar bara irritation och ett oseriöst intryck.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Model driven engineering, Software product line engineering, Software evolution project» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Revised: Materials performance, Heat and moisture engineering, Geotechnics, Structural dynamics (the course seems suitable for Applied mechanics only)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Water reasourses (from Lp1), almost every lecture was about the same thing and the project did not give anything at all. Modelling and problem solving (Lp2), dont know why I had to take it. Useless. Wastewater engineering (Lp4): the project has been very bad. Not clear what should be done nor how to do it. Geotechnics (Lp4): I feel that it is too difficalt/too high level with the knowledge I got. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Moci - to large!!!!! was like a 15 hp course Governance - no one in my class really understood what it was about. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- In the machine learning course we are expected to know a lot of Matlab programming, something that we don"t do with our background. This is an unreasonable requirement. The course software engineering using formal methods, the lectures are even ridiculous! Someone that have taken a bachelor in Datateknik should know the difference of for example "and" and "or". You must be expected to know this after 3 years of studies! Same thing in Artificial Intelligence! Knowing basic logic should be seen as a prerequisite.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Design systems - worst cource I ever took. Sustainable development and Nordic architecture should be heavily revised - it"s not accetable to have sources that are mainly aimed at exchange students. The majority of the students are still swedish students.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Seminar, dynamical systems, simulation » (Yes (3 to 4))
- See my comments above. Urban metabolism - there must be other courses to chose between! Drinking water engineering - was not well organized, I almost was ashamed since this was the first thing that all students from abroad met at Chalmers. And then it was just repetition of thing we hade already learnt in the bachelor. felt really unnecessary. Modelling and problem solving in civil eningineering - a mixtur og things ... why (!?) is this course mandatory? Make it better in that case.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Material performance. Heat and Moisture. Indoor climate and HVAC» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Materials performance and Heat and moisture must definitely be HEAVILY revised. Probably all teachers in those courses, Tang Luping & Bengt Dellming, must be replaced! This is 2 mandatory introductory courses and they are really terrible! HVAC and ondoor climate is a course I had high expectations on, but it was a disaster, the teachers in this course were terrible and the structure of the course was totally missing!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Medical imaging Bioelectromagnetics » (Yes (3 to 4))
- There are several courses that are very much repetition from the bachelor courses. Also several courses needs to be reorganised to have a clear structure.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Research design and methods should be taught in bachelor program since the students are expected to use the methodology in all project work anyways» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Financial risk (MVE220), Partiella differentialekvationer, grundkurs (TMA372), Mathematical modelling (MVE160)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Design processes and management, Should be revised or removed. Managing organizations in the construction industry, should be shortened. Construction Governance, should not end with a test, rather an article. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Courses like applied signal or modeling and simulation are don"t do anything with biomedical, rather than pure engineering courses.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Marine transport systems, marine propulsion systems should be revised at least» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Material performance and heat and moisture engineering - only a repetition to byggnasdmaterial and byggnadsfysik with no new relevant information. Heat and moisture i studied for 4 days and got a 5. The course is also too easy. Structural systmes, design and assessment. A course book would be good.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Modelling and problem solving (didnt taught us anything), water resources (worst organisation ever), drinking water (repetition of bachelor course hydraulik), and giving a "ground" course in urban metabolism as the last course before the thesis is ridicolus» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Systems biology: this course was very unstructured, and I cannot say I learned very much from it. A couple of the lecturers had not good ability to teach in english. Concepts of systems biology could however be very useful, so the course should be kept. Industrial biotechnology: within by track in the programme (Biomaterials and tissue engineering), I have felt no use of this course. Most of the necessary knowledge in this subject area I have gained from Bioreaktionsteknik and other courses in the Bachelor programme. I think the course should be made optional and a track course for the Biomedicine and biotechnology track. Biological materials: this course could be improved in structure, as well as with lecture and examination. The exam and project for this course did not really require any great effort. A problem for the learning was that it was not so good literature.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Psychology and leadership can be delivered in one course. International project and risk can be delivered in one course. 3PM must revised. Methods must be delivered in the 1st year. Chalmers" supervisors must grade the theses. Replace Northumbria by another university. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Remove BOM090 and BOM055. Revise BOM030 and BOM070. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Operations Strategy did not give much more than the week in the QOM-course. The elective project should be presented and choosen at the same time. The Operations Improvement Project was not as good as hoped. Comming from the Ind.ek bachelor much in the QOM-course were repetition and could have been read as a 7.5p course. The elective Production Logistics course felt as a Bachelor course and would be much better with more discussion of logistic strategies and decisions.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Design systems too easy, vague, and simplistic. Design for social inclusion. fewer workshops, more urban theory.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I havent"t had the course urban metabolism yet, but from the parts that covered that in the Modelling course i am not particulary looking forward to it. Also friends who have taken the course said it wasn"t very good.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Engineering of Automotive Systems, Vehicle Traffic and Safety and RVAD(It was a very general course)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think the courses related to water and waste water should be divided to at least 4 courses which has more concentration on quality of water, hydraulic aspect, treatment process, water recourse management. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- See comment above!» (Yes more than 5)
- The WET-courses are a mess. There should be less of them or put in another program entirely. Urban Metabolism should also be removed since it can"t provide anything useful.» (Yes more than 5)
- 1- Artificial Neural networks 2- Computational Biology A 3- Computational Biology B 4- Dynamical Systems 5- Complex Systems Simulation 6- Complex Systems Seminar 7- ... » (Yes more than 5)
- I"m on my last year now and I feel that it has been the same content in more or less every course from the beginning. Having courses at both Chalmers and GU poses a real problem as to controling the content in the courses. Today the overlap is so big that i feel really bored going to the lectures since it"s sometimes the 4th time hearing the same things.» (Yes more than 5)
- Almost all should be heavily revised, and some removed. I expect that this will happen once this programme starts having their course PMs evaluated.» (Yes more than 5)
- You should give more courses for student selecting. For the first study period, we have two fixed compulsory courses, however for the first period of the second year, there are only two courses can be selected. What"s the meaning of this course selection?» (Yes more than 5)
- It is more about compressing them and refine the education so that more can be taught during the same amount of time. » (Yes more than 5)
- Most of the elective courses should hold a higher level.» (Yes more than 5)
- Remove the overlap!» (Yes more than 5)
- System Biology course.» (Yes more than 5)
- Tex alla "produktionskurserna" var så snarlika att det skulle kunna slåss ihop till en kurs.» (Yes more than 5)
- I think the classes that are in the program are good, but the execution is terrible. For example, LCA is crucial in this program, but no one learned anything because it seems like teachers were learning with the students and couldn"t ever give a concrete response or explanation. You just did whatever you want basically. And how come we"re supposed to do an LCA in the LCA class if we already did one for ESA? The ESA one was harder, far more educational, we had to do our own research, and that"s the class we take first... perhaps LCA should be taught first, then ESA.» (Yes more than 5)
- But there should be more options to choose, the decision of which courses are compulsory elective and which are only elective is somewhat unfair and stop you from doing what you find interesting.» (No)
- None of the mandatory. However, some of the elective courses, for example biological physics, needs improvements» (No)
- There are plenty of courses to choose, and hard to get any guidance in what subject to study.» (No)
- My program is very flexible within the CS field, and this is a good thing. Keep the choices.» (No)
- Just improved.» (No)
- Don"t remove courses, expand the programme» (No)
- Not at master level. in the whole civ ing program there are lots of courses that could be heavily improved.» (No)
- More "räkneövningar" as in the old times.» (No)
- One does not have to remove any courses and it would not be advisable to do so since different students have different goals in mind. However, some of the courses which are mandatory today are COMPLETELY meaningless to student who want to pursue a purely theoretical career, and these courses also prevent us from taking meaningful courses such as group theory and classic field theory which are ABSOLUTELY essential to us. We cannot continue our careers without these courses and much of what we study is difficult, or even impossible, to understand since we lack necessary knowledge in several key areas of theoretical physics.» (No)
- I dont think anything should be removed altogether. But I do believe that the courses in traffic and road etc are too similar, and too easy.» (No)
- Just a slightly more variable examination to encourage studying of the whole course, not just old exams.» (No)
- But better coordination should be made between courses. For example did the TCIT course and R&D Strategy overlap a lot. And we want to learn new things and not repeat what has already been learned. » (No)
- add more courses make från idé till färdig byggnad a compulsary course» (No)
- I have studied my first year abroad and have thus not attended any lectures at Chalmers within this master program yet.» (No opinion)