ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

LP 3 ARK146 - V13 - Architectural conservation and Transformation

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-04-03 - 2013-04-22
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 22%
Kontaktperson: Lena Axelsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Learning outcomes

With "learning outcomes" we mean the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach.

After course ARK146, students should be able to
- describe and analyse the built environment as a resource (cultural, architectural, technical, environmental and economical)
- describe and analyse views, ideas and policies that are practiced by different professions and stake-holders in the process of conservation and transformation
- analyse and reflect on the relation between cultural and architectural values
- analyse and reflect on the relation between architectural design and building technique in an historical perspective
- be in the know of building materials and craft from historical and contemporary periods, and how they can be combined and applied today
- apply the knowledge and understanding in a conservation process, and cooperate with other professionals

1. How do you think the learning outcome has been pursued during this course?*

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Badly»0 0%
Sufficiently»2 20%
Well»6 60%
Very well»2 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4

- I wish this aspect would have been more present during the course:(be in the know of building materials and craft from historical and contemporary periods, and how they can be combined and applied today)» (Well)
- One of the best, or if not the best arranged course that I"ve pursued in my entire study life. We made so much fun things, and learnt so much during such a short time. After the course ended I really felt like learnign more about conservationism.» (Very well)

2. Are the learning outcomes reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?*

10 svarande

No, they are too elementar»2 20%
Yes, they are reasonable»8 80%
No, they are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.8

3. Are the learning outcomes reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?*

10 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»10 100%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

Education and course administration

4. What support have you got for your learning from...*

Matrisfråga

- Wish there could be more lectures? Especically about materials and other reference-projects where they combine new and old (on world heritage sites)»
- The tutoring with the man from Belgium was rather slow. He mixed extremely slow/poor English with occasional words in Swedish. His tutoring became really good and spot on when he spoke entirely in Swedish, but then the foreign students understood nothing.»
- Seminars are good but often a hard way of discussing personal vs actual theories, since it always depends on the group. Role playing is a more efficient way of encuraging people to argue and discuss i think, since it is not ectually their own opinion. »
- work shop was ok but not splendid. more lectures with a specific topic would be nice. Kia must prepare the lectures she holds in english better! CShe is an excellent tuitor and architect, but she did not communicate that in her lecture because her english was so poor. I"m sure if she put some time preparing in detail what to say, looked up proper vocabulary etc she would not have the same problem again. The same problem we as non native english speaking students are confronted with daily»

Lectures*
10 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»1 10%
Rather big»6 60%
Very big»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Literature*
10 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»1 10%
Rather big»4 40%
Very big»5 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Studies on site*
10 svarande

Very little»1 10%
Rather little»1 10%
Rather big»7 70%
Very big»1 10%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Seminars*
10 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»6 60%
Rather big»1 10%
Very big»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.7

Tutoring*
10 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»2 20%
Rather big»5 50%
Very big»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.1

5. Think about the amount of the parts componing the course. Do you think they are...*

Matrisfråga

Lectures*
10 svarande

Too few»5 50%
Adequate»5 50%
Too many»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.5

Literature*
10 svarande

Too few»0 0%
Adequate»6 60%
Too many»4 40%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.4

Assignments*
10 svarande

Too few»0 0%
Adequate»9 90%
Too many»1 10%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.1

Seminars*
10 svarande

Too few»3 30%
Adequate»6 60%
Too many»1 10%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.8

Tutoring chances*
10 svarande

Too few»2 20%
Adequate»8 80%
Too many»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.8

6. How did the course organisation (information, schedule, homepage, handing-in) function?*

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- exemplary!!» (Very well)
- This course should be a role model for any other course at Chalmers Architecture. Good work!» (Very well)

7. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?*

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»5 50%
I have not asked for assistance»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Work environment

8. How was the possibility of using Chalmers equipment (computers, rooms, carpentry, etc.)?*

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 33%
Rather good»5 55%
Very good»1 11%
I did not use any of the school equipment»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- general for Chalmers architecture, not only this course» (Rather bad)
- Chalmers work environment in general is qutie bad. But what was good was the we could choose where ot study by ourselves for the most part.» (Rather good)
- since there was no room reserved for the course it was not always easy to find a working space. » (Rather good)
- It"s hard since we didn"t get a room, but if you know where there are possibilities to sit and study it works out fine.» (No opinion)

9. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?*

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 20%
Rather good»4 40%
Very good»3 30%
I have worked individually»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Have worked in two different groups during the course, and non of the worked really well. Then it could have been me that was the problem.. =)» (Rather bad)
- I have come to realize that four people working together is too many. In my opinion groups should consist of two to three students. Of course, then there will be more groups...» (Rather bad)
- we were too many for such a short project. if you limit number of group participants to 3 it would be good» (Rather good)
- We were 5 in our group, but it worked fascinatingly well actually!» (Very good)

Concluding questions

10. What is your overall opinion of the course?*

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»1 10%
Good»3 30%
Very good»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- The course should be continuous. It was hard to read all the texts and at the same time having the Studio course, same for project phase.» (Passed)
- One of the best becuase of the information from day one and the consistent assignments during so short time. » (Very good)
- Inger-Lise is excellent, inspiering, positive, professional, nice as a person, caring for the students, passionate about her subject... as well as Roberto as assisting teacher. » (Very good)

11. What should be preserved next year?*

- Study trip.Roberto/ Inger Lise. Seminar/ litterature.»
- Tanum trip. Design work. Hell yes!»
- - essay based on literature (but literature in smaller amount) - tool box work shop - design proposal»
- »
- The studytrip, lecture by Flemming Aalund and ofcourse the relly nice party after the feedbacks of the projects!»
- The staff! The essay.»
- The lectures, the assignment.»
- The mixture of theory and practice!»
- The communication, organization, motivation from tutors and help during the course was great.»
- study trip»

12. What should be changed next year?*

- More lectures with an interest on referenceprojects.»
- More time on site, for the trip.»
- instead of the literature seminar it may be more interesting to work for a longer time and on the toolbox work shop but more into detail.»
- I think the literature and the assignment could have been better connected. In this case we read a lot about conservation and transformation of old buildings and theories about that, but the assignment didn´,,t handle that question at all, insted we worked with a completely new building. I think it should have been more interesting to work with an old building, but at the same time I guess it could be difficult to finish an assignment like that in the short time we have. But then I think you should choose other literature and lectures insted.»
- Maybe another designassignment. It would be nice to include something that is built.»
- x»
- The seminars were interesting, but perhaps they could be a bit more clear and... actually, formal.»
- The study trip should have more programme (but not too much - the free evening was very nice! :)). The second day was not very useful for the project.»
- Tannum assigment wasn"t interesting at all. Students want to understand how to make interventions in old heritage buildings. New assignments that involves existing old buildings (very old) will be much appreciated. I.e. extensions, renovations and their impact...»
- more time for the last assignment»

13. Other comments

- The ending of the course was REALLY the best ending I"ve experienced in a course. It was with a tear that I said farewell to the group we had gotten»
- The trip to Tanum felt a bit protracted. One day should have been enough. But in the long run I think it was a nice course, well organized. »
- More lectures and less people in the groups, to summarize my opinions.»

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från