Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Technology and Society 2012/2013 SP 3, TEK 225
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-20 - 2013-04-30 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 13% Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.4 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 75% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 25% |
75%» | | 3 | | 75% |
100%» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Teaching was useless babble bout a very small area of technology, broadband. The course name is completely misleading and if I had payed for this product I would definitely have demanded my money back.
I would have liked to instructed referencing and how to write a home exam.» (50%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?4 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 25% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 50% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Well I have NO IDEA of what I have done right or wrong. The only information on my reaching the goals or not is "points" and a grade.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Examination: Project and take home exam6. How long time did you spend on all 3 take home exams combined together?4 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
20-30 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
30-40 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
More than 40 hours» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - It took very long time for me since I did not now where no begin. There was no how-to instructing me or any examples to follow. How can the teachers possibly believe that we are going to learn something when we are only being examined?» (More than 40 hours)
7. How long time did you spend on the project?4 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 2 | | 50% |
20-30 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
30-40 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
More than 40 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Also here lack of instructions makes work very hard. If grading is even to be considered in this course we must have some sort of reference or example project in full text for each grade.» (20-30 hours)
8. What grade would you give the take home exam as a means to learning?4 svarande
Very bad» | | 1 | | 25% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 25% |
Average» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - I just read a bunch of articles without any real cause or goal. I felt like a word processor just printing whatever came on my mind. I learned no useful methods or any real information that is of could be of use at all.» (Very bad)
- We didn"t get them back, so you didn"t know what you could inprove when you wrote the next one.» (Bad)
9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?4 svarande
Very bad» | | 1 | | 25% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Average» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - I would not recommend this course for my worst enemy.» (Very bad)
Teaching and course administration10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 - What teaching? If you are referring to Erik"s sitting in his chair mumbling something about "ICT ecosystems" I was not aware of that being the definition.
Although I must say Ibrahim was a good lecturer even if the information he gave us was not very useful.» (Small extent)
11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - IF I learnt anything it was from the articles mentioned in the course litterature.» (Some extent)
12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 75% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - The webpage was well-structured but I was missing a lot of references in the litterature list. Downloadable course litterature could also have had systematic filenames.
What I mostly missed was comments and feedback on exams and projects.» (Rather well)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 75% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 25% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - The meeting with Ibrahim was vital even if I felt confused then it is very important to get feedback and to know that you are on the right track.» (Rather good)
14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?4 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 100% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 15. How was the course workload?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 33% |
High» | | 2 | | 66% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 16. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 50% |
High» | | 2 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5
Summarizing questions17. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 25% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 50% |
Good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - I am very disappointed to see a course as awful as this at one of Sweden"s best universities. I definitely do not believe this is what an MTS-course is supposed to be about. Erik is not suitable for teaching(DO NOT HIDE THIS FROM HIM!).» (Poor)
18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Nothing at all.»
19. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Fast grading and feedback on the home exams is a criteria and not an option for learning to even be possible! One must be able to know what one has to learn and what one already knows!»
- I would like to see the corrected take home exam, so I can do better on the next one.»
20. Additional comments- If your institution has any honor whatsoever it will discontinue this course without any further delay.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|