|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Production Flow Management, TEK435Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-03-19 - 2013-04-15 Antal svar: 26 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41% Kontaktperson: Lars Medbo» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
1. On average, how many hours per week have you spent on the course, both individual work as well as lectures, seminars etc.?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 6 2. On average, how much of the total education have you participated in?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 9.53 - I missed one guest lecture in cause of sickness.» (90%) 3. On average, how much time have you spent on each of the four literature seminars (time to be prepared for each seminar plus the time spent at the seminar)?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.88 - Depends upon the number of articles to read, but I usually spend around 1,5 hour per article plus around 3-4 hours to write the seminar. » (7,5 hours) 4. On average, how much time have you spent on the the case assignment?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 9.46 - per week. (Very strange question)» (7,5 hours) 5. How understandable are the learning outcomes of the course?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 6. Did the examination (seminars and group assignments) test if you have achieved the learning outcomes?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - Did not write the exam» (I don’,t know) 7. To which extent have the lectures contributed to your learning?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - have not attended lectures » (To very small extent) 8. To which extent have the course literature and other course materials contributed to your learning?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 - I couldn"t borrow the course book.» (To large extent) 9. To which extent have the seminars and seminar tasks contributed to your learning?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.38 10. To which extent have the group assignments (MFM case and Shop floor execution and control) contributed to your learning?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - It felt like it was too much small stuff to do in the group assignments, so it all blurred together. It would be nice if it was more focused, and maybe with a grading as well to give incitaments for more effort! » (To small extent) 11. To which extent have the compulsory guest lecturers contributed to your learning?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.03 - I have not participated in any guest lectures due to changed dates» (To very small extent) 12. How well did the course administration work?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.42 - The seminar questions were sometimes posted late. Otherwise the course administration was very good.» (Good) 13. How was the opportunity to get help and to ask questions to course responsible (Lars)?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.65 14. How did you perceived the reception from the course responsible?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.15 - Sorry, can"t understand the question....» (Ok) 15. How was the working climate between you and the other students?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.57 - I loved my group members for the case study, but the shop floor group was/is horrible as we had one in our group doing nothing at all.» (Good) 16. How was the work load in this course?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - seminar questions are difficult» (High) 17. How was the total work load this quarter?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 18. What grade would you give the course as a whole?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.23 19. Was it good to use seminars as a learning method and as a part of the examination?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.42 - The seminars were good for learning but the amount of work required was a bit too much. Especially with the returns. I rather see the exam as mandatory and smaller focus on cases and seminars.» (To some extent) 20. Would you recommend the course in its present from to other students? If not please motivate.*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.26 - The course in itself is quite good, but I felt that it is biased in some ways and therefore might not reflect the reality to 100%» (Maybe) 21. Is this course appropriate in your master program?*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.46 - I thought it was very suitable for our program to learn how to do a VSM on an entire supply chain. » (To large extent) 22. I am studying the master program in:*26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.23 - First year» (Supply Chain Management) 23. Lectures: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- Good and relevant, not much to add.»- lectures were well organised, the presentation slides were SOMETIMES slightly too minimalistic and thus lacked structure and clearness. » - I"m an international student and can"t understand the slides in Swedish, especially the Swedish in picture form that I can"t copy and paste them in google translate. Of couse it"ll be quicker to just ask Swedish students but I still hope all in English. The same improvement is for the course lean production. » - In my eyes the slides were not of that good quality. Usually if you miss a lecture (e.g of sickness) a student should be able to learn the content on his own from the slides easily. I think this wasn"t the case. To sum it up: the slides are not made for self studies.» - It was good that it was quite few lectures, then you pay attention to the ones you really have. » 24. Literature seminars: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- A little too extensive, too harsh on the grading in my opinion.»- Substantial contribution to learning outcome, sometimes it was difficult to see coherence between the papers though. Workload regarding papers was quite high.» - Since we would possibly have to do rework after the senimar, it could be better that we can discuss some of the questions in the report instead of only discussing the own questions. So we can understand more and do the complement better.» - Although it was always a lot to read, when I think back, it was a great doing that.» - I liked them, quite good questions! It gave you the chance to dig down in some subjects from the start, which is good for learning» 25. Group assignments: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- Interesting but too harsh on the grading/examination. Case assignments rarely get to be complemented in other courses, even if they need to be passed. if many groupes got to complement their case reports after the course is over it is a sign of a failed timeplan for the course.»- As the lectures were cancelled for the 2nd week, the workload were concentrated in the following week. We have different groups for this course and the other course and everyone has some personal stuff. And not everyone in the group selected the same course. So we have different schedules and can"t meet often. This is ok for other group assignments, however, this assignment material is in Swedish. So we can"t do it without translation. Swedish classmates are very kind. They outlined the processes first. But actually I didn"t get all the details. If the movies were in English, I can watch them over and over to understand them. I know Swedish is very important here but this is not a course about language and culture...» - Some people thought we were too many people in a group as most of the time was spent on arguing about formal details and meeting date setting. It would have been more efficient and less time consuming with smaller groups (although I see the benefits regarding your checking and our group discussions)» - It was an interesting task, however since we had so much else to do at the same time, it felt like all of the groups just wanted to get it done - especially the second part of the case. I think the fact that it is only pass/fail is contributing to this. » - Make it more focused, maybe make it so that it they represent 20% of the grade in total or 30%, that way you really start to care for the project itself! As it was now, it was easy to make it second priority and not caring because it is easy to fail and then just fix what needs to be fixed, it is often easier than putting down a lot of effort and then get it passed the first time.» 26. What should be changed concerning the course?- The written examination is a little too extensive, considering that we already achieved a grade 3 by passing seminars etc. In the written exam we still had to perform 30 out of 50 points to get a grade 4 (starting from 0), even though we already collected an equivalent of 20 points from passing seminars and case reports. This actually makes the exam on a total of 70 points and puts the grades 4 and 5 at 50/70=71% and 60/70=86%, respectively. Which is not fair compared to the usual Chalmers guidelines of 60% and 80%, respectively. »- Nothing :)» 27. Comments and other remarks- Nice with Lars as an enthusiastic lecturer!»- The workload was concentrated in the third and fourth week due to lecture cancellation. Also the last guest lecture was cancelled. The schedule should be improved to be more heijunka. » - Thank you for the coffee! :) And a big compliment to Lars Medbo. I haven"t seen many professors with such big enthusiasm for their subject and the will to really teach. » - I really felt that the teacher Lars was too biased when it came to how he viewed the world of production flows, what is good (kitting, Uddevalla, parallelization etc.) and what was less good (continous supply, line assembly...) in how the slides were designed, and what was focused on! For example, kitting had like 20 slides in one Power Point while Continous supply only had a few. I think it needs to be more balanced! » * obligatoriska frågor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%