ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Virtual Process Planning VT 2013, PPU165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-19 - 2013-03-31
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Jonatan Berglund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time in, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.

9 svarande

At most 10 hours»1 11%
About 15 hours»2 22%
About 20 hours»2 22%
About 25 hours»2 22%
About 30 hours»2 22%
At least 35 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

2. How much of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 22%
75%»2 22%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- 90+» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning objectives.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 55%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

4. Are the course goals reasonable considering the number of credits?

9 svarande

yes, I think so»8 88%
hesitant»1 11%
no»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.11

5. Did the examination (assignments + written exam) assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 66%
Yes, definitely»3 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 77%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- Mainly the labs. BG:s lectures are somewhat confusing at times» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Acceptable»6 66%
Good»3 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Exercises/Labs/Tasks

9. How would you grade the NC Machining/MasterCAM demo in the Manufacturing Lab?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»2 22%
Acceptable»1 11%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Good to only be 2 students» (Excellent)

10. How would you grade the PPR-Delmia labs and Master Project?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How would you grade the IRB-Offline Robot Programming Lab?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 33%
Acceptable»1 11%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

12. How would you grade the Fundamentals of Robot Control using MatLab lab?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»4 44%
Acceptable»2 22%
Good»2 22%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- Didn"t quite understand the task at hand to be honest, had no previous experience in reading the graphs and making conclusions from them.» (Fair)

13. How would you grade the CAM in ProE Exercises?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 22%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

14. How would you grade the CAM in CATIA exercise?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Acceptable»3 37%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

15. How would you grade the lab in Coordinate Metrology (CMM machine)?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»2 22%
Acceptable»4 44%
Good»2 22%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Can"t remember this one.» (Acceptable)

16. How would you grade the RD&T Geometric Tolerancing Lab?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 22%
Acceptable»2 22%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

17. How would you grade the two hour NC-Machining Lab?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 11%
Acceptable»2 22%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

18. How would you grade the Free Forming Machine demonstration?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 11%
Acceptable»2 22%
Good»6 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

Study Climate

19. How was the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

20. How has the cooperation been, between you and the other students?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 55%
Very good»4 44%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

21. How was the total workload during the entire study period

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
High»7 77%
Too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- It was a bit high with the constant labs and an exam from this course paired with 2 hand-ins per week from another course, not a good match. I"d say this course was ok though in terms of load, the other one was too much!» (High)

22. How do you evaluate the workload of labs for this course?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 77%
High»2 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.44

DELMIA Laboration

Please give a more detailed review of the Delmia PPR Task in questions 23-29. This will be used by a group of students do develop next years lab material.

This is a message from them:

"We are a group of students from Mechanical engineering and Automation and Mechatronics, working on our bachelor thesis, with the goal of constructing new instructions for the DELMIA lab assignment in Virtual process planning. The new instructions are going to be based on the equipment in the Production Systems Laboratory. With your help we would like to evaluate the current lab instructions, through this short survey.

We are also conducting an evaluation on out upcoming lab, later this spring. Make sure to look for further information about this. Your input is important for our project.

Thank you for your help!"

23. Did you think the tutorials for Delmia were easy to follow?

9 svarande

Excellent»2 22%
Very Good»2 22%
Good»3 33%
Poor»1 11%
Very Poor»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- I had no issues following the instructions and the tutorials at all.» (Excellent)
- Unstructured and Hard to follow» (Poor)

24. Did you feel that the material gave you a clear picture of what the lesson was going to cover?

9 svarande

Yes»6 66%
No»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- I want to know the final result before the lesson» (No)

25. Did the course give you enough knowledge for your eventual future use of Delmia?

- Not as in I could work with it but it gives a nice base, something to build on.»
- Yes»
- no»
- No, Since the purpose of this lab was to familiarize the software for the students. »
- It taught the basics »
- no»

26. Did the tutorials cover the essential parts of Delmia?

- Hard to say right now, since I don"t know what I haven"t learned about Delmia yet. I"d say probably most of them though.»
- Yes»
- yes»
- I don"t think so, since we only used one function of Delmia which was assembly.»
- Yes »
- no»

27. What should be kept in the Delmia Lab material for next year"s course?

- I thought it was a good experience but then again I"m usually extremely fast with labs, but I"d say keep all of it.»
- Overall the materials was enough for the purpose but if there is going to be any changes in the purposes of the lab then the materials should be changed.»
- Manipulation and situation»

28. Did any part of the Delmia lab need more/less focus than it got in the lessons?

6 svarande

Yes»1 16%
No»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

29. Is there anything else you would like to change in the course material?

6 svarande

Yes»1 16%
No»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

Summarizing questions

30. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Worst course ever»0 0%
Fair»2 22%
Adequate»3 33%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»0 0%
Best course ever»0 0%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- I liked the labs, and the guest lecturers. I"ll leave the conclusion to you, whoever reads this.» (Adequate)

31. What shoud be preserved for next year

What are your suggestions on what worked well and should be kept for next year and not lost in the continuous improvements?

- Interesting guest lecturers and labs were good and gave good knowledge and insight!»
- overall the lab sessions were quite good. But one the relation between the lab sessions and the lectures was not well described.»
- Delmia and g-coding »
- The intention to relate between different concepts»

32. What should be changed to next year?

- Some of the lectures were not helpful and they were not related to the assigned literature, especially the communication lectures.»
- Better lectures and clearer instructions ön the course in general»
- Clarity of purpose»

33. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.44
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.61

Kursutvärderingssystem från