ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanotechnology for sustainable energy, TIF165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»8 72%
Around 25 hours/week»1 9%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 9%
75%»1 9%
100%»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

- interesting topics» (100%)
- Missed only one of the lectures» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 30%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 37%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 62%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.62

- inhomogenious group makes it hard to fullfil all needs» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»1 12%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- It didn"t cover the larger understanding that we should have goten from all the » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The lectures were almost only for wakening the interest. I don"t think we have learnt anything relevant.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»3 27%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 18%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The ping-pong documents where a bit fussy to follow. Would be beter to have one folder with the information from Dinko and one with the powerpoints from the lectures» (Rather badly)
- Good that the slides were provided before every lecture. But since they were only provided one hour in advance, and they couldn"t be printed properly on the university"s printers it would have been much better if we could get them on the night before so we can print them at home. I don"t know why the uni"s printers couldn"t print them. They always said "too much data".» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»9 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- the teacher spent a lot of time on answering questions » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»4 36%
Adequate»6 54%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»6 54%
High»3 27%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- I only studied 75%.» (Low)
- depended on which courses you choose» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting but I don"t feel I have learnt so much. Maybe a few things.» (Adequate)
- it would be nice to goo deeper into details of the discussed topics and give a less general overview» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- project»
- the nice contact between students and teacher»
- Quizzes: They gave me a good motivation to study.»
- The amount of subjects. To have it as versitile as it is now.»
- The project and the guest lecturers.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Add some actual physics. The content is really poor.»
- More information on the project at the beginning of the course would be good. We wanted to start early, but did not really know what we should do.»
- More depth on the lectures. Give a deeper insight in the technology, not only the popular science.»
- When we have guest lecturers, they have prepared 2x45mins of presentation. That"s good. But in the beginning of each of their lectures professor Chakarov has taken 10-15 mins for talking about irrelevant issues. That"s not good! For example one of the lectures that had prepared a lecture after our first quiz had only possibility to talk 45 minutes even though he had been told to present for 75 minutes.»
- Split the presentations into two parts. 10 hours of presentation are way over the top»

16. Additional comments

- I found it irritating that in quiz one, the questions were not to explain the processes, but to give examples. The other quizzes were better in this point.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.63
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.63
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från