ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TIF120 Surface and nanophysics, TIF120

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»9 81%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- It is very dependent on what you aim for» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 27%
100%»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

- ...although the "teaching" was mostly conducted by fellow students.» (100%)
- Very good lectures» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 45%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- Did not find them.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- Don"t rember seeing the goals so can"t answer» (?)
- There did not seem to be any learning ambition.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»1 14%
To some extent»3 42%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»3 27%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Too little teaching» (Small extent)
- Was hard to follow » (Some extent)
- The teachers were great, especially Igor :)» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»4 36%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»1 9%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- There was no "course material"» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»1 10%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Igor is brilliant when you ask him though.» (Very badly)
- was ok with ping-pong. Could be used to higher extend, but all info was easy to find» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»9 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Igor is awsome to ask for help, and the other lecturers was really good in answering questions!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 18%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»4 36%
I did not seek cooperation»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»9 81%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Takes a lot of time to make presentations but the learning outcome from those projects are low seen over the whole topic of surface and nano pysics.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 45%
High»6 54%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- I am working on my master thesis» (High)
- Other courses took much time.» (High)
- depends on which courses you choose» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»2 18%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»4 36%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Didn"t learn much» (Poor)
- Wasn"t what I expected even though Igor is really really nice. It was way to theoretical.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation examination»
- Structure of the Examination»
- Igor, he is the best!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- how lectures content is related to the examination»
- More teaching, less examination.»
- More information about the course before the start of the course »
- The room or the amount of people. We were to many in the class to have oxygen for a hole lecture. There were also to many people to have the presentations during the lecture time.»
- Some of the lectures were to long without break. 2-3hours non stop withour breaks... you fall asleep»

16. Additional comments

- The grade criterions are unclear. It is generally unclear what is expected from us students.»
- A course that is different from the courses that I´,ve read so far. Have to work in another way than before :)»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.09
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.09
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.52

Kursutvärderingssystem från