Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biotechnical physics, TIF040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»5 83%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Varies during the period, some weeks was much heavier than others» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- But there are many terms that are unfamiliar without proper background» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 83%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- The two first questions in the exam didn"t have to be so large. Other things could have been better to ask about.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Great lectures!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Could upload the slides before the lectures» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
High»3 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- During some periods it was really high, but in other weeks low. » (High)
- Exam could have been one week later. At least not so close to the last lecture.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»2 33%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Its a good course, but it is a large area to cover» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The individual literature project»
- Annette :)»
- The litterature study»
- Article project»
- Individual literature project, including supervision and the ability of choosing the most interesting article. Andreas lectures and ppts were well structured and the calculation exercises were good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A lot of the lecture slides only contained an image, which was okay while at the lecture. But when studying for the exam it was very hard to remember what the intention of the image was. More key points are needed.»
- More information about laboration, what to do, the description was vague.»
- The course literature is way too extensive compared to what is covered in the course. The reading list probably included about 600-700 pages, when all you needed was covered in the slides. When I wanted additional information however it was hard to find what was needed, I ended up googling instead. Some powerpoints need to be more clear and pedagogic. The ppt of lecture 5 was a mess with too much text. Some slides inlcudes only a heading and a picture, which is okay at the lecture, but you won"t remember what the key points were a few weeks later. »

16. Additional comments

- Without much background in cells and biology it is hard to follow some concepts and ideas that seemed obious for others. With this level it would be good to mention that some courses in biology are prerequisite or important to have»
- According to rules at Chalmers the exam is supposed to be anonymous.»
- A collection of more calculation exercises/tutorials could be good.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62

Kursutvärderingssystem från