ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MCC115 Modeling and fabrication of micro/nanodevices

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 37%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»2 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 12%
75%»1 12%
100%»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- even the supervisors of the single project did not know what they should do with the group.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- It was a project and we didn"t have any lecture during course just some meeting with the project team. The material that they gave us could be more related to the project. At the begining of the period we didn"t have idea about have we should work, present or report in a team. It could be more clear.Also we didn"t know that we should attend in the project meetings and by the chance we found it. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- the level was very low since there was no clear schedule we could follow» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 50%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»3 37%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- there was no offiscial material. we got random old papers of the project in order to understand the device we have been working on» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»1 16%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Wasn"t necessary since we worked on a project» (?)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»4 50%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- The PhD student that helped us wasn"t on time and sometimes that I had booked time with him, I had to wait for him about 30 minutes.I think he was very busy but we helped me really good for finding my answers.» (Rather good)
- the studyclimate at the project was good and at the course meetings (midterm and end examination very bad)» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 25%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»4 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- the motivation in the group was very low, since the goals were not clear» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»1 12%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- ...mainly influenced by the motivation of the groupmembers and supervisors» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»4 50%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»3 37%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- no clear goals, if students are not highly motivated there is no reason to participate» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation»
- interesting topics of projects»
- It was a useful course for me. I learnt a lot about how work in a team work and the microfabrictions.The midterm presentation was a very good idea and being no grades (just pass/fail) also was good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Mid-presentation needs to be smaller in size, maybe 10 min presentation. Give out an example before hand how you want it to be. »
- Professor should not consume so much time when students don"t know to answer questions because the audience is getting bored.»
- The examinator. »
- better examination climate, clear instructions to supervisor what to do (1 week topic introduction/theoretical background, 4 weeks device fabrication (with clear topics students can prepare for), 2 weeks device characterization (with clear goals))»
- I think the aim of course should be more clear.At the begining of period sometimes waste to find what should we do and how we should participate in the project.»
- No questions during the presentations, only after every presentation. It is very rude to the people presenting interupting by questions in the middle of presentation. If it has to be like that it has to be said before that this will be more of a discussion like presentation.»

16. Additional comments

- Examinator where to aggressive on the presentation. Don"t try to press down a student when the person doesn"t know, just let him/her continue (after a while) and talk to him/her afterwards instead.»
- the main reason for the bad outcome of this course is the poor organisation. The teacher sould give clear and detailed instructions to the project supervisors.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.62
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.62
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.4

Kursutvärderingssystem från