Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FMI036 Superconductivity and low-temperature physics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»1 7%
50%»1 7%
75%»4 28%
100%»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- I was not in Sweden the first two weeks. The rest of the classes I have all attended.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 16%
Yes, definitely»8 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It should have been more challenging» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»6 46%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»10 76%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek cooperation»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 61%
High»4 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 76%
High»2 15%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 53%
Excellent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The labs didn"t really help» (Good)
- Lectures were very good! Laboratory assignments should be renewed/improved.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Teacher is excellent!»
- The structure of the lessons»
- Professor and the topics.»
- the nice way of explaining difficult matter»
- The lab sessions helps to understand the theory better when we get hands on experience on what we learn from the classes. Dealing with state of the art equipment was really fascinating.»
- Lecture set up. Homework questions at end of the week regarding treated content.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- To skip labs or make students role more active during the labs. The exercises should more challenging (as it was the first one). High Tc lectures should include less information if there are going to be only two lectures. Furthermore, the lecturer of High Tc superconductors should not speak too fast»
- Would be nice with some more exercises »
- It would be nice if the laboration exercises worked»
- the laborations should be better prepared and should offer more hands-on-exparience»
- High Tc SC part. It is quite vague what we should know and what is possible. The lab work could be more individual (not just looking with 6 people to what the assistant is doing) and I think new topics could be interesting for the lab work. To bring a handwritten paper to the exam seems peculiar. Maybe just a useful formula sheet made by professor or class.»
- Lab equipment»

16. Additional comments

- I really have gotten closer to many understandings of superconductivity, so thumbs up.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.46

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.46
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.86

Kursutvärderingssystem från