Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MVE155 Statistical inference

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 49%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 28%
Around 20 hours/week»7 28%
Around 25 hours/week»8 32%
Around 30 hours/week»3 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The course collided with another course.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»5 20%
50%»3 12%
75%»9 36%
100%»7 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Many lectures collided with mandatory stuff that I had to attend instead.» (25%)
- Schedule collision :(» (50%)
- Serik is a good lecturer» (100%)
- Very good teaching organisation, the lectures and excercise classes completed each other very well and gave a very good Foundation to learn the course.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

25 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»8 32%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 24%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- The goals can not be found on the course homepage» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- I don"t remember what the goals said but I"ve seen them.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»3 15%
To some extent»9 45%
Yes, definitely»6 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- I felt that the way the exam was composed differed a lot from previous years, I had expected more tests and less theory» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»4 16%
Some extent»9 36%
Large extent»10 40%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Borde vara bättre föreläsningar, kan göras bättre/annorlunda än anteckningarna som finns. Blir tråkigt att veta exakt vad som skall sägas bara genom att läsa i anteckningarna.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»5 20%
Some extent»2 8%
Large extent»15 60%
Great extent»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Knappt några lösningar i boken, om man t.ex. är osäker på en fråga vet man inte om man har tänkt rätt eller fel. » (Small extent)
- The book was worthless.» (Small extent)
- The book was not that good but Serik"s lecture notes were very helpful» (Some extent)
- The lecture notes on the course webpage were good.» (Large extent)
- The lecture notes are very good.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»15 60%
Very well»9 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.32

- The web page offered little (general) information and was not updated very often (apart from the seminar notes)» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»11 44%
Very good»6 24%
I did not seek help»7 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- It would be better if one could ask questions about the bonus assignments.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»9 36%
Very well»10 40%
I did not seek cooperation»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»14 56%
High»7 28%
Too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

12. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»8 32%
High»12 48%
Too high»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- I read 3 courses :/» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

25 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»4 16%
Adequate»7 28%
Good»13 52%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was an interesting course, but very much material so it was hard to do everything rigorously. It felt like the exam did not cover the most relevant parts of the course, and that the previous exams that were available were better, but maybe I am not the right person of judging that.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- That the lecture notes are on the website and can be downloaded.»
- Good lecturer and good with regular assignments during the course.»
- The Bonus assignments.»
- The hand-in exercises were very good and I learned a lot from them.»
- The good teacher.»
- The lecture notes.»
- Serik and his organisation of the course, which is very good. The bonus assignments are very helpful as well, and I personally learned a lot from doing them. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The home assignments. Don"t make them so difficult. Have more of them,»
- Mera räknestuga. Så att man kan arbeta med uppgifter samtidigt som man kan få hjälp av någon lärare. »
- I"d rather see that serik presents some additional things during the lectures rather than just presenting his lecture notes by the letter»
- The bonus assignment"s were a bit confusing since it was sometimes hard to interpret what they meant»
- The course needs some assistants that can help the teacher on exercises and grading bonus assignments. The exam was too theoretical, should have included more "real life scenarios" in the questions.»
- Change litterature.»

16. Additional comments

- Maybe add some time for exercises classes where students can work and ask questions meanwhile.»
- Correction of the bonus assignments would be very useful to improve in scientific writing and to apply the theory from the course.»
- Föreläsaren hade en hel del skämt som kändes osmakliga och inte bör finnas under undervisning. T.ex. att om en "beautiful lady" frågar om något under tentan kan han nog svara mer hjälpande än om någon annan frågar, vilket enligt föreläsaren inte är okej i Sverige men eftersom han kommer ifrån en annan kultur. Detta i kombination med skämt under en annan föreläsning om att döttrar måste giftas bort etc., gör att jag anser att det gick överstyr. »
- I got the feeling that the course didn"t have the funding it needed. It would have been nice if the bonus assignments could be graded the week after their deadline so that you could see how well you were doing them during the course. Now, instead you had to do all four assignments before you got to know the result on any of them (a couple of days before the exam). This way you have no idea of knowing how you should present the answers. I can also add that some reflection on the bonus assignments (what to think about and so on) would be really nice. From what I understood the teacher didn"t have time for all of this, and that is why I think the course should be more funded and/or the teacher should make use of assistants.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.44

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.44
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.61

Kursutvärderingssystem från