ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

VTA160 Human response to sound and vibration, spring 2013, sp 3

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Lena Axelsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 10%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 90%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

10 svarande

0-20%» 0 0%

20-40%» 1 10%

40-60%» 0 0%

60-80%» 7 70%

80-100%» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I think we didn"t learn very much.» (20-40%)
- How living beeings are affected by sound.» (60-80%)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

10 svarande

No, not at all» 1 10%

To some extent» 4 40%

Yes, definitely» 5 50%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 3 30%

Some extent» 4 40%

Large extent» 2 20%

Great extent» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Erkin was really good and was capable of explaining the topics. Penny was not so good at that.» (Small extent)
- Not very good pp-slides by Penny and Erkin. Too much information on them. Alice very really good!» (Some extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 1 10%

Some extent» 6 60%

Large extent» 2 20%

Great extent» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

10 svarande

Very poor» 1 10%

Rather poor» 2 20%

Rather good» 3 30%

Very good» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I have never got an answer from any of my emails.. Very bad..» (Very poor)

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly» 1 10%

Rather badly» 1 10%

Rather well» 7 70%

Very well» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Lack of information. Took a while before the lecture notes and information came up there.» (Very badly)
- Lecturer was sick all the time and never at the office when I was looking for help. » (Rather badly)
- Some misunderstandings about the labs and how we were supposed to do them. » (Rather well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 30%

Large extent» 2 20%

Great extent» 5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

10 svarande

less than 20%» 4 40%

20-40%» 5 50%

about 50%» 1 10%

60-80%» 0 0%

more than 80%» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- My main focus has been on the two other courses during this period.» (less than 20%)

10. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 3 33%

Adequate» 6 66%

High» 0 0%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- I liked that it was a little low since the other courses requires very much time, especially RAC.» (Adequate)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor» 1 10%

Fair» 3 30%

Adequate» 2 20%

Good» 4 40%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Could have learned more.» (Fair)
- The course has many interesting aspects but a better organisation for laboratory works improves the quality of the course. » (Adequate)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

10 svarande

Very small» 0 0%

Rather small» 2 20%

Neutral» 4 40%

Rahter high» 4 40%

Very high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Erkin, he is a very competent and engaged teacher.»
- I think the home exam and the rolling ball labs were good and made you think of important aspects regarding human response to sound and vibration.»
- Erkin. Hometask.»
- The home exam. It was first here I actually learned something.»
- labs»
- The examination was good however some part like designing a listening test could have been placed as a laboratory work in the beginning of the course. »

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Penny is maybe not ready to teach this course yet, at least she need to improve her teaching skills. Better slides, when you look at them after the lecture, they really don"t say much. Unorganized and not well explained. »
- Penny should not walk around so much in front of the desk when she talks at lectures, and move her arms less. More concrete reading instructions before each lecture.»
- no idea»
- The feedback about lab has not been given yet. That is something to improve. I would have expected to have more information about human hearing physiology in air and bone conduction mode! Maybe, a weekly quiz is also something to be added to the course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från