|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Management of physical distribution 2013, ITR585Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-03-13 - 2013-04-13 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38% Kontaktperson: Dan Andersson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Your background and own effort1. What is your educational background?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.13 - M.» (Chalmers Other programme) 2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.22 Goals and goal fulfilment4. How understandable are the course goals?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?Don"t answer this question if you haven"t done the final written exam yet.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.63 - There were a lot of questions on the exam which resulted in that I had no chance to answer everything. » (No, not at all) Course structure and content6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Often the lectures gets off track, making it hard to follow and get the point of the lecture.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the guest lecture "Transport purchasing strategies" (Volvo) been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.7 - Very interesting, but not helpful for the examination.» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the guest lecture "Distribution systems" (Bring) been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.94 - Pretty interesting compared to many other guest lectures!» (Large extent) 9. To what extent has the book been of help for your learning?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - The book was HORRIBLE!! The entire part aout tariff and contract was even not correct! How can we use a book that have so many "wrongs" in it? I think that"s a shame!! Kent"s book is not good at all!» (?) 10. To what extent have the articles been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 - Most of the articles are useful except some of them such as supply chain integration the role of logistics service providers (Nathalie et al, 2009). If the article is not very important, it is better not to list it in the seminar instruction and students can find extra information on web if they want.» (Some extent) 11. To what extent has the "Case assignment " been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.68 - It is only a waste of time this project. It is not stated in a good way what is expected of the students and the assignment is so unclear. plenty says this! even last years students.» (Small extent) 12. To what extent has seminar 1 "Distribution systems" been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.59 - I think it was pretty hard to follow those articles.» (Some extent) 13. To what extent has seminar 2 "Division of roles in distribution systems" been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - Had Joakims seminar group. There was only hard theory discussions on some specific model discussed in one of the articles which is very hard to relate to. » (Some extent) 14. To what extent has seminar 3 "IT and Distribution systems" been of help for your learning?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.77 - It was pretty OK.» (Some extent) 15. How did you perceive the mix between lectures, guest lectures, assignments, seminars, etc.?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - It is just that this whole period with the other course have been very full.» (Fair) Course administration16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - Ping ping är ingen höjdarsida» (Very badly) Study climate17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 18. How was the course workload (only consider Management of Physical Distribution course)?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 19. How was the total workload this study period (i.e. for the courses Management of Physical Distribution and other courses)?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 Summarising questions20. What is your general impression of the course?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - I"m very disappointed of many parts of this course which unfortunately makes the total impression pretty bad. The teachers, except the one leading the course, was not good at all. the book was bad and the book"s owner were not very good at presenting either. Very bad slides!!!! The case assignment was terrible. The worst I"ve ever made. The tutor was very rude and mean, he had NO clue about how to get good feedback.» (?) 21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Seminars but which can give more points to exam.»- The seminars» - The seminars, with the a different content for some of them.» - The case assignment was very good. I learned a lot from that. Also, the articles were really interesting. Many of the lectures were very interesting. This is a really interesting course, however, the goal of the course is somewhat hard to grasp. » - Seminars had good value for me.» - Dan"s entusiasm! And the seminars!» - Seminars» 22. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The feedback from Joakim was good but could be said in a more polite way.»- remove project!» - The book EOS, the case.» - I don´,t understand why there is such a big focus on the pricing and cost at the exam when there is not in the lectures. If cost/pricing is so important you should either have calculating lectures or a seminar about it.» - Clearer instructions to the case.» - It was díffuícult to grasp the case assignment. A more substantial introduction would have been preferable.» - Case assignment should be removed if it can"t be made clearer, like a proper case solving created by the examiner.» - Earlier introduction of the case assignment. Grade the group assignment higher.» - The case and course book.» - The workload was high this semester due to seminars in both courses. However, it is a good way of learning. I would prefer smaller groups so that discussions would be more relaxed, as I think it is easier to learn in that environment. Also, the pricing lectures could have been more interactive. They didn"t give that much. » - The case should be restructured so it would have a clearer aim and has a better connection with the course topics.» - THE CASE & the other two teachers!!!» - The case, it was difficult to understand what to do and the "help" and feedback wasn"t very nice! » 23. Additional comments- The exam questions were too big!!!! »- I was exited when I read the course PM, but was very disappointed after. It needs to be more clear what the course is about.» - The workload is very high at least for me. Some students who did their bachlor in industry economy in Chalmers may feel it easy since some articles they had read several times before. Three lectures (including another course) were cancelled in the second week of the quater and all the lectures have to be delayed in the following weeks including the case instruction which delay the schedule of starting the case assignment. The workload were concentrated in the following one or two weeks. There was one week that almost everyday had a deadline and seminar that I was a bit overwhelmed. The tight schedule had an impact on my study effect directly. » - This course should not be compulsory elective in its current state, since it in my opinion is of very low quality. It"s a shame that those students who are going abroad and need to take their compulsory elective courses during the spring. » - -The case assignment should be restructured, in a way that the topics asked to be more clear. -The book contains some points with "blurry" (not so clear) rationing/explanation. » - A very interesting course. » - unfortunately very disappointed. I wasn"t seeing the course potential until I started to study for the exam and when I started to understand what has been going on for the past 7 weeks. It took very long time to see what we were doing. And I have to say that the case assignment made me very disappointed. I haven"t learn anything!»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50%