Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPCSN 1213-3 Parallel computer organization and design, EDA282|DIT360
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-04-12 Antal svar: 3 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27% Kontaktperson: Maria Sörner» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Datateknik 300 hp
Opening question1. Which university do you belong to?Some of our courses are taken jointly by students of the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology. In order for us to be able to look at the answers of each student group separately, we would like you to indicate which university you are registered at.3 svarande
University of Gothenburg» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers University of Technology» | | 3 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 2
Your own effort2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.3 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 66% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 3 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 66% |
100%» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.
To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)4. How understandable are the course goals?3 svarande
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 3 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 2 | | 66% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?3 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 33% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 7. I feel that I learned the fundamentals of parallel computer design sufficiently well to:3 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Reason about design tradeoffs» | | 1 | | 33% |
Understand the literature on general topics» | | 3 | | 100% |
Find more information when I want it» | | 1 | | 33% |
None of the above» | | 0 | | 0% |
Teaching and course administration8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 10. How much of the assigned reading did you complete?3 svarande
None» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very little» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some» | | 0 | | 0% |
Most» | | 2 | | 66% |
All» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 11. How do you rate the amount of assigned reading?3 svarande
Too little» | | 0 | | 0% |
About right» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too much» | | 3 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 3 12. If you did not do the reading, why not?0 svarande
It was too hard to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
I had too much other work to do» | | 0 | | 0% |
It was not important to me» | | 0 | | 0% |
It was not interesting to me» | | 0 | | 0% |
There was too much assigned reading» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 0 13. How useful did you find the assigned textbook?3 svarande
Not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very» | | 1 | | 33% |
Esssential» | | 0 | | 0% |
It varied» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 14. What topics, if any, would you recommend covering in more detail in future offerings of this course?15. If you answered the previous question, how would you like those topics to be covered?3 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
In lectures» | | 0 | | 0% |
In readings» | | 0 | | 0% |
In exercises» | | 0 | | 0% |
In labs» | | 0 | | 0% |
16. How useful did you find the exercise sessions?3 svarande
Not useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Indispensible» | | 0 | | 0% |
I did not attend the exercise sessions» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 17. Rate the level of difficulty of the exercises.3 svarande
Too trivial/easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
About right» | | 1 | | 33% |
Too hard» | | 1 | | 33% |
Impossible» | | 0 | | 0% |
I did not do the exercises» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 18. Rate your level of interest in the discussions during exercises.3 svarande
Not interesting/off topic» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat interesting» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very interesting» | | 1 | | 33% |
Indispensible» | | 0 | | 0% |
I did not participate in the discussions» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 19. What would improve the quality of the lab exercises?3 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
More parallel programming» | | 0 | | 0% |
More simulation experiments» | | 1 | | 33% |
More experiments on real hardware platforms» | | 1 | | 33% |
The labs were OK as is» | | 2 | | 66% |
- Would be interesting to see impact from cache misses, and locking primitives in simics.» (More simulation experiments, The labs were OK as is)
20. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?3 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66
Study climate21. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?3 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 22. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?3 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 33% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 23. How was the course workload?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 66% |
High» | | 1 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 24. How was the total workload this study period?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 3 | | 100% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions25. What is your general impression of the course?3 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 100% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - good course but very hard» (Good)
26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- good lectures and labs, less good exercises (too difficult)»
27. What should definitely be changed to next year?28. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|