ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

V13 - Virtual process planning, PPU165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 22%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 44%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 11%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 11%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 2 22%

75%» 3 33%

100%» 4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- they weren"t very good» (50%)
- The lectures where about the same thing all the time, and pretty boring:/» (50%)
- 90+» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 3 33%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 55%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- There was no clear picture about the course till mid of the term.It was sometimes confusing.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- it took me over half of the course to understand what Viritual process planning meant, and when I did it felt like the lectures didnt have anything to do with it...» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The goals are reasonable but the content feels a bit off..» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all» 1 11%

To some extent» 8 88%

Yes, definitely» 0 0%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent» 3 33%

Some extent» 4 44%

Large extent» 1 11%

Great extent» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2

- it was all to much of how a NC machine works, that was the only thing i learnt » (Some extent)
- In labs, teachers gave a lot of support, but in lecture sometimes the contents is not well-structured. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent» 4 44%

Some extent» 2 22%

Large extent» 2 22%

Great extent» 1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The book of this course even makes students more confused, since compared the contents from the book with the lecture, something are different.» (Small extent)
- Didnt use the book» (Small extent)
- The book was to expensive, the slides a bit messy » (Some extent)
- Not the book but everything else was good. Book was not worth the money. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly» 2 22%

Rather badly» 1 11%

Rather well» 4 44%

Very well» 2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The purpose of some labs should be clarified at first.» (Very badly)
- i missed allot about the labs should have been some kind of PM describing what they were about, » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 11%

Rather good» 6 66%

Very good» 2 22%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Jonatan answered all the questions » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 55%

Very well» 4 44%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 6 66%

High» 3 33%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- A bit too high with the constant labs and lectures » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

High» 2 22%

Too high» 7 77%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

- the other course took allot of time» (Too high)
- The other course had a really high work load.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor» 4 44%

Fair» 1 11%

Adequate» 3 33%

Good» 1 11%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- to little Virtual process planning to much NC machines» (Poor)
- The teacher is Bengt-Göran Rosen is acording to me not suitable for teaching. Terrible motivation and bad slides. He drifted off on the wrong subjects during lectures as well.» (Poor)
- The labs where quite usefull, however poorly explained, but mostly the course where confusing and the content didn"t seem that usefull» (Poor)
- The contents of this course are very interesting and useful, but the lectures and administration do not help a lot.» (Adequate)
- BG isn"t a good lecturer. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab sessions»
- The labs are very good.»
- Labs, other lecturers »
- I actually don"t know.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Too many laborations and softwares for very short demo classes.I would suggest having fewer labs and concentrating more on them.»
- some lectures on specific topics seemed very general and has no effect on learning outcome.»
- Some slides of the lectures are repeated again and again and the contents of slide should be organized more obviously. Even when reviewed the slides for the exam, it is hard to follow the main flow due to the complicated slides»
- BG »
- New main lecturer»

16. Additional comments

- Information regarding the lectures,schedules were conveyed late and unupdated which caused lot of confusion»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.11

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.11
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.27

Kursutvärderingssystem från