Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
V13 - Applied mechatronics design, SSY261
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-18 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 21% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 28% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 6 | | 42% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - The lab could take a while if you got stuck, but in general the course material was already known to me.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- A lot for me.» (Around 25 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 14 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 7% |
75%» | | 6 | | 42% |
100%» | | 7 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.42
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 21% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 21% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 57% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 5 | | 38% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 61% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.61 - As a Z-student, almost nothing was new to me.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- It could be a bit more complicated. More could be done with the lego mindstorm robots.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Think this course is a bit too easy for a masters course» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Bachelor in mechatronics» (No, the goals are set too low)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?14 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 8 | | 57% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 35% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 42% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - Knowing what a PID controller means and how it works was the best outcome of the course.» (Small extent)
- I knew everything aldready» (Small extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 2.21 - There were no course litterature...» (Small extent)
- Didn"t look at it» (Small extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 71% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - Very well designed Ping-Pong page!» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 85% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very well» | | 12 | | 85% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - I wrote all the code.» (Very poorly)
11. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 21% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 57% |
High» | | 3 | | 21% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 12. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 42% |
High» | | 4 | | 28% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 7% |
Good» | | 5 | | 35% |
Excellent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It was a good course as a whole and Jonas is a great lecturer. The problem is that it was the same course as "systemkonstruktion" Z"s base program though. It should really not be recommended for Z students.» (Fair)
- assignments could be stressed - e.g. more complicated tasks, concerning stability of control! (solving a maze is nice, but more a logical task and not a mechatronical challenge)» (Adequate)
- Funny course. And even though the workload was low, I feel that I have learn"t a lot.» (Good)
- It"s a pretty good course, but I would have hoped to learn more» (Good)
- One of the best courses I"ve had!» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Jonas. He is an excellent professor. He genuinely cares, has fun, and enjoys teaching.»
- The lego assignments»
- Jonas Fredriksson and the lego assignments (those were great fun and gave better programming understanding)»
- The way the lectures are held, with repetition in the beginning.»
- The labs are nice to get some experience in prgramming of robots»
- Jonas, the lego labs, good lectures with examples and videos.»
- Lab works need to be mandatory for better learning of Simulink.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the signal excercises. They were a bit simple»
- The course should be more technically advanced.»
- Longer deadline for the second assignment. More work with Simulink, for example making it possible to build Simulink models of the robot used during the assignments.»
- It would be good to know if you have passed the assignments or not and how many bonus point you have collected for the exam. No such information were available.»
- It would be good to have access to the lab during weekends, since we all have different schedules, we often worked during nights and weekends.»
- No comments»
16. Additional comments- Great teaching and great relationship between students and teacher.»
- Very fun course, I got practical skills that I have not achieved from earlier courses. Keep up the good work :)»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.28
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.28 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|