Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPALG 1213-3 Programming language technology, DAT151|DIT230

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Maria Sörner»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Datateknik 300 hp

Opening question

1. Which university do you belong to?

Some of our courses are taken jointly by students of the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology. In order for us to be able to look at the answers of each student group separately, we would like you to indicate which university you are registered at.

24 svarande

University of Gothenburg»2 8%
Chalmers University of Technology»22 91%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 20%
Around 20 hours/week»12 48%
Around 25 hours/week»4 16%
Around 30 hours/week»3 12%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.32

- Labs took alot of time» (At least 35 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»4 16%
50%»4 16%
75%»5 20%
100%»11 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I were sick a lot during the course» (25%)
- I am working full-time so it was not possible to attend more frequently» (25%)
- Started by attending the lectures but i did not feel that it gave me anything besides "Hands on with lab xx". » (75%)
- Very good!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)

4. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 4%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»22 91%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Very good match!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»24 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 8%
Yes, definitely»21 87%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»5 20%
Some extent»5 20%
Large extent»10 40%
Great extent»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Referring to the courses I attended» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 16%
Large extent»11 44%
Great extent»10 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- Did not use the book, only the slides.» (Some extent)
- I liked the book.» (Large extent)
- Did not buy the book. The slides were sufficient.» (Large extent)
- The "Dragon book" is not relevant any more and it"s very complicated, I could only find the first chapter useful as an introduction. The new PLT book was good enough for the course and the assignments (there are some typos).» (Large extent)
- The textbook was great.» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»13 52%
Very well»12 48%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- Just once a lecture wasn"t scheduled and still everyone showed up. Its could be clearer with some announcement on the webpage.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»6 24%
Very good»11 44%
I did not seek help»7 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- One more assistant at the lab sessions would be great» (Rather good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»1 4%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 24%
Very well»13 52%
I did not seek cooperation»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- My lab partner was very unresponsive and decided to drop out of the course later.» (Very poorly)

12. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 12%
Adequate»13 52%
High»9 36%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- The labs took up a lot of time» (High)
- I think it"s just bad timing on the third assignment because the deadline is in the middle of the exam week.» (High)
- The labs were very hard to do alone sometimes. Maybe they could recommend doing it in pairs. » (High)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 28%
High»12 48%
Too high»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- Because of the combination of work and studies.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

25 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 8%
Good»16 64%
Excellent»7 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Can"t really see why this is on an advanced level. Compared to the other advanced master courses this was childish. » (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs took up a lot of time, but you learned a lot!»
- Laborations.»
- The labs»
- Lab assignments.»
- The labs.»
- The labs»
- The course material and the labs.»
- Everything»
- The lectures were good. It was very good that the labs were in focus during the course and the level on the exam were good too.»
- The teacher, the course literature and the labs.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe some excersice-classes?»
- The content and speed of the lectures. Felt like we could have learned so much, but it was too slow! Stopped attending after a while.»
- The enviorment for the labs and more Guides to how to use BNFC and the other programs. I had alot of trouble to just get the programs to work, amlost spent more time on findning out what a error message means than to soulve the acctual lab.»
- Faster response on the labs»
- The lab deadlines. Much time at the beginning, no time at the end.»
- Little more time for help on lab3 taken from lab2.»
- I had to spend very much time on getting the programs and things for the labs to work on Windows. If they can"t give better instructions to for Windows maybe they should recommend not to use it and use the school computers instead.»
- Nothing that I can think of.»

17. Additional comments

- You should really edit the course information page about what courses are prerequisites. I haven"t read either functional programming nor logic and had to struggle with those parts of the course a lot. I really think they should stand as recommended prerequisites.»
- Correcting labs faster would be good.. But Aarne Ranta rules!»
- Aarne Ranta is awesome!»
- The professor of this course is very kind and provided a lot of helps on my labs. »
- I like the content of the course but again - This is not advanced material. Take it back as an bachelor course of the D-programme »
- It felt like we were given too much help in the assignments, there was practically nothing to figure out by ourselves»
- This course was a lot more fun than I thought it would be.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.2

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.2
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.8

Kursutvärderingssystem från