Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP3_12/13 Environmental risk assessment in engineering, BOM060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-04-07
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»6 60%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 10%
75%»4 40%
100%»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- the statistical part was held exceptionally boring and unnecessarily hard to understand. it proved to be better to read about the topics on Wikipedia while in class than listening to the lecturer...» (75%)
- 90-95% indeed.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The goals could be more specific...» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The goals need to be specified.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 60%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- To much double information in the beginning of the course.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»1 10%
Rather badly»1 10%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Lack of or very unclear information through all the course. Especially in the project and exercise where it was hard to know what to do.» (Very badly)
- The best would be if lecture slides could be handed out before a lecture (perhaps the day before) so the students can print them and have them to make notes on during the lecture.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»3 30%
Very good»5 50%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Some of the teachers where very helpful, other didn"t seem to understand why we had questions and couldn"t/didn"t want to explain and help us.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 20%
Very well»8 80%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
High»5 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 40%
High»5 50%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The project was very good and interesting, learned a lot. However, the PM for the project could have been better, as it is now, it is kind of confusing and unclear. » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project, it gave a good overview of the matter. The human health exercise was also really good since it gave an understanding about how the calculation of guideline values are made in SADA.»
- exercises»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps the project work could be started earlier in the study period? The project took a lot of time in the last week with hand-in and presentations when one wants to focus on studying for the exam.»
- the presentation of the statistical part»

16. Additional comments

- You could add a few more examples of risk assessment in other areas. But in general, I am very satisfied with the course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.6
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från