ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP3_12/13 Environmental management, VMI035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-07
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 1 6%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 26%

Around 25 hours/week» 5 33%

Around 30 hours/week» 2 13%

At least 35 hours/week» 3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- mostly for the project» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 6%

75%» 5 33%

100%» 9 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 6%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 6%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 7 46%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- But the subject itself is a little bit diffuse.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 13 86%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all» 1 6%

To some extent» 8 53%

Yes, definitely» 6 40%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- But the exam should be (at least) 5 hours long. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 2 13%

Some extent» 7 46%

Large extent» 4 26%

Great extent» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- To little information from the lectures - it was really hard to know what to study for the exam!! » (Small extent)
- The teaching was very interesting and created good discussions and points to think about. But I felt there was no connection between the teaching and the examination at the end. The exam would have been possible only reading the course compendium» (Some extent)
- The lectures should follow the course requirements more. They were interesting but not very helpful for passing the course. Also it would have been great if there was a clear structure and "red thread". It felt like the lectures were all guest lectures. » (Some extent)
- The lecture about the thesis did not add anything relevant to the course but the rest were good.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the fish bank role play been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 7 46%

Some extent» 3 20%

Large extent» 3 20%

Great extent» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2

- pointless» (Small extent)
- Interesting and fun exercise, would have been good to have more of a discussion afterwards» (Some extent)
- Really good Connection to the reality» (Some extent)
- Fun role play!» (Large extent)
- It was really fun!» (Great extent)

8. To what extent has the two workshops been of help for your learning

15 svarande

Small extent» 4 26%

Some extent» 6 40%

Large extent» 4 26%

Great extent» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- Workshops were helpful but not very giving. At least one of them I thought was just a waste of time.» (Small extent)
- Really good ones» (Great extent)

9. To what extent has the sector presentation (bank role play) been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 4 26%

Some extent» 9 60%

Large extent» 2 13%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

- I think the teachers should score the sector presentation (not the class) since most people voted for their friends (and not the best presentation). But I really liked that the teachers prepared prices for us all :)» (Some extent)
- More for fun, but for some student, they have to see it from Another Point of view. But I was already aware of the banks intrests.» (Some extent)

10. To what extend has two literature seminars been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent» 7 50%

Some extent» 3 21%

Large extent» 3 21%

Great extent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- The person holding the seminar seemed really not prepared. She didn"t seem to have understood large parts of the texts we discussed. » (Small extent)
- The first seminar that I had war poorly managed as It seemed like the seminar supervisor wasn"t fully prepared.» (Small extent)
- Would have liked more» (Great extent)

11. To what extent has the project been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 4 26%

Large extent» 7 46%

Great extent» 4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3

- They should have made it clearer that there was no formal grading on the project. I spent countless amount of hours correcting people"s English, and it turned out it was all in vain, since it wasn"t graded at all. Waste of time.» (Large extent)
- The projects were to massive, next year I suggest that the students only compares two companies. Then put the presentation/opposition one week earlier and let them work with the report after the opposition, how are you else going to learn anything from it? (Alternatively, have written oppositions and then presentation a week after.)» (Large extent)
- The project was a great help in gaining a deeper perspective into the reasons beehind some of the companies" actions. It gave us the opportunity to read between the lines and see what they were claiming to do/ what they were actually doing. » (Great extent)

12. Who has been your supervisor for the project work?

15 svarande

Birgit Brunklaus» 4 26%

Kersti Karltorp» 5 33%

Hanna Nilsson» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

13. To what extent has the supervision been of help for completing the project work?

15 svarande

Small extent» 1 6%

Some extent» 2 13%

Large extent» 6 40%

Great extent» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- The supervision from Hanna was lacking. She wasn"t clear on what she wanted to see in our report and I believe we were graded down based on the lack of direction and instruction.» (Small extent)

14. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 4 26%

Large extent» 6 40%

Great extent» 5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Really bad articles in the compendium. Especially the first article. Change the course literature. » (Some extent)
- Although very helpful, a lot of the literature tended to repeat itself.» (Large extent)

15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 13%

Rather well» 10 66%

Very well» 3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Not much was provided on pingpong (from the lectures) and it was badly organised and the files had confusing names so was hard to find things.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 6%

Rather good» 0 0%

Very good» 13 86%

I did not seek help» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- Good with regards to the project» (Very good)
- Answer on emails even weekends!» (Very good)

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly» 1 6%

Rather poorly» 2 13%

Rather well» 3 20%

Very well» 9 60%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Very poorly with some of them, very well with the other ones.» (Rather poorly)
- The huge gaps between people"s level of English made the project work very unequal. » (Rather poorly)
- Good to chose a mixed Groups, but to choose by your own.» (Very well)

18. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 8 53%

High» 4 26%

Too high» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

19. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 6 40%

High» 6 40%

Too high» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?*

15 svarande

Poor» 1 6%

Fair» 1 6%

Adequate» 3 20%

Good» 9 60%

Excellent» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would NOT recommend this course to anyone. Most of the time I felt stressed and confused because I didnt know what to focus on for the exam and the project was very diffused! (I mean just to figure out which analysis method to use? My group used two but some groups only used one??). Make the project work smaller next year and add more REAL LECTURES to the course!» (Poor)
- During the review on the last day, it was mentioned that this course was designed to be a general overview of Management Systems, rather than a detailed guide to how to implement Management Systems in detail. Why? Why would this be the case in a presumably accredited and internationally renowned Master program in Industrial Ecology? As a result, this class was extremely general and lacked discernible direction.» (Fair)
- I know see different things from a different prospective and have more knowledge about the hard and sometimes difficult work whintin a Company/society and ther environmental performance» (Excellent)

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Project, lectures»
- The seminars and chances to work and discuss things in smaller groups (not in lecture rooms)»
- The fish banks role-play and the project. There could also be a greater emphasis on the project. »
- Role play, projects»
- Henrikke!»
- The project, workshop and seminars should be preserved next year»
- examshould measure what has been t»
- The Fish Bank Role Play!»
- Groupwork!»

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Length of the exam: really not enough time to write the exam.»
- There should be more projects, or a project with more detail than the exam. The organisation of the course homepage could be improved»
- Give individual grade on the project, or be clear that it is not worth spending hours and hours on writing references properly, correcting grammar, organising layout, etc.»
- Some of the articles in the compendium repeated themselves. »
- Projects (as described in Q11)»
- The organization of the lectures (see comment 6)»
- more guidance for the project - If you are not going to be clear on what you want in the project, you cannot be upset when the project does not fulfill your expectations.»
- Everything else.»
- maybe the litterature seminars. It was good to have them because you were "forced" to read throuht the articles but might performe the seminar in Another way. But I have no suggestion on how.»

23. Additional comments

- Feel like this course would be better if there was no exams and the grades were based only on project work. I also would have like more seminars, and discussions in smaller groups.»
- Very limited time to write the exam. Wasn"t able to complete all the questions properly within time, not to say time for check.»
- A clearer structure and aim of the course is needed. There seemed to be no progression, just a bunch of lectures.»
- In overall - this course was terrible. The worst so far I have ever taken at Chalmers. Please change the layout of the course to next year. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.53

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.53
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från