Visa resultat

SP3_12/13 Environmental policy instruments, UNA016

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		2		16%
Around 20 hours/week»		6		50%
Around 25 hours/week»		3		25%
Around 30 hours/week»		1		8%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		3		25%
75%»		5		41%
100%»		4		33%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- leaving some lectures after the break that was really bad» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		8%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		7		58%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		4		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- but some of the lecturers were very poor at communicating some topics. » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		10		90%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		4		36%
To some extent»		6		54%
Yes, definitely»		1		9%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.72

- The exam was really bad. The third question was not in the course. » (No, not at all)
- This exam was really a low blow. We were given two quite big exercise papers, containing some 40 questions. From my personal experience, questions like that are supposed to reflect what is likely to come on the exam. All the calculations on these questions were of the same type, rather easy MC/MB calculations. And then on the exam, 20 points out of 80 were on the discount rate, which had been discussed on one lecture only. Why was there not a SINGLE exercise on it? The same goes for the forst question. All exercises covered climate change and transportation issues. Then CBA comes up? If you decide to give out exercises that are meant to prepare one for the exam, make sure to make them bloody relevant, or do not give any at all. This was a treacherous way to fool students, as you will probably see from the exam results. I mean, seriously, you handed out a new exercise paper about a week before the exam. Couldn"t you have done it a little bit different, to at least give a hint that one should prepare oneself for something different than what had always come before?» (No, not at all)
- The examination was terrible and not at all representative of my knowledge. The exam was poorly written and a poor representation of the content of the course.» (No, not at all)
- Somewhere between "not at all" and "to some extent". Seriously? What was the problem with making this exam, asking on very minor issues and totally neglecting the basic and important parts of the course?! So so bad! And what is really poor from the course administrator is that we did not get response on the project work before the exam and the you go and have a question correlated to that! It would be nice to have some feedback so you know before the exam if you did your calculations and understood REP.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		5		41%
Some extent»		5		41%
Large extent»		1		8%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- The teaching was the worst part of the course.» (Small extent)
- Many lecturers were pretty bad Magnus and Anna were really good» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		3		25%
Some extent»		5		41%
Large extent»		3		25%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- The book is messy and hard to follow.» (Small extent)
- The book was completely unnecessary to do well in the course.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		4		33%
Rather well»		6		50%
Very well»		2		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

9. What is your opinion about the performance of Jessica Coria as lecturer?

Poor»		4		33%
Fair»		3		25%
Adequate»		1		8%
Good»		2		16%
Excellent»		2		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- Jessica Coria is not a good lecturer. She should not be in charge of this course.» (Poor)

10. What is your opinion about the performance of Efthymia Kyriakopoulou as lecturer?

Poor»		2		16%
Fair»		5		41%
Adequate»		1		8%
Good»		3		25%
Excellent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

11. What is your opinion about the performance of Anna Nordén as lecturer?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		2		18%
Adequate»		4		36%
Good»		3		27%
Excellent»		2		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- I wasn"t there» (?)

12. What is your opinion about the performance of Xiangping Liu as lecturer?

Poor»		5		41%
Fair»		2		16%
Adequate»		2		16%
Good»		2		16%
Excellent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- She had far too many slides. When you are skipping through the slides at the end in rapid succession, you did not plan the time well and are therefore a poor lecturer.» (Poor)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		2		16%
Rather good»		3		25%
Very good»		4		33%
I did not seek help»		3		25%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- I heard one student that was revised not to ask any additional questions and stick to the course material when just asking Jessica where to find information from a lecture in the book. Also when asking questions over mail I felt the respons was to not be too overambitious with questions.» (Rather poor)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		1		8%
Rather well»		6		50%
Very well»		4		33%
I did not seek cooperation»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

15. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		3		25%
Adequate»		8		66%
High»		1		8%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

16. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		3		25%
Adequate»		6		50%
High»		2		16%
Too high»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		5		41%
Fair»		2		16%
Adequate»		0		0%
Good»		5		41%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I had really high expactations on this course from what I had heard from older students. However, it was very dissapointing, I think it has probably changed a lot since dropping Sterner. » (Poor)
- This course has the potential to be great but the execution was awful. I would not recommend this course to anyone.» (Poor)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

20. Additional comments