Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP3_12/13 Leadership and communication, BOM030
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-07 Antal svar: 20 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
1. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 20 svarande
1» | | 2 | | 10% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 4 | | 20% |
4» | | 4 | | 20% |
5» | | 10 | | 50% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - Evaluation and assessment of students were not clear, therefore motivation was not on high levels»
- The best course so far on Chalmers. Räisänen obviously is a great tutor.»
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 20 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 5% |
2» | | 3 | | 15% |
3» | | 6 | | 30% |
4» | | 7 | | 35% |
5» | | 3 | | 15% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 20 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 5% |
2» | | 3 | | 15% |
3» | | 1 | | 5% |
4» | | 9 | | 45% |
5» | | 6 | | 30% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 The course was very well administered 20 svarande
1» | | 2 | | 10% |
2» | | 2 | | 10% |
3» | | 0 | | 0% |
4» | | 8 | | 40% |
5» | | 8 | | 40% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.9 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 20 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 5% |
2» | | 2 | | 10% |
3» | | 5 | | 25% |
4» | | 3 | | 15% |
5» | | 9 | | 45% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.85 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 20 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 5% |
3» | | 3 | | 15% |
4» | | 10 | | 52% |
5» | | 5 | | 26% |
I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- Guest lectures»
- The group work»
- The tasks and the homeexam as well as the lectures on mondays.»
- The structure: full mondays, hand in on friday.»
- a lot of guest lectures»
- Guest lectures, but contents should be improved according to master level. This information given was so common, almost everything was known.»
- The group tasks. »
- guest lecturer were very good. please keep max!»
- All parts!»
- Max"s lecture»
- All of them, except the CV part.»
- -»
- working in groups»
4. Were there any elements missing in the course?- Some sort of guidence where the group could reflect upon their work with a supervisor.»
- Information in early stages of the course what was expected and how the different parts of the course was weighted.»
- No»
- Yes, lectures and contents of the course were not up master level standards.»
- Maybe also a lecture with a "experienced leader" from a company.»
- More listening focus, check out Kent Adelmann»
- It Would be interesting to get practitioners perspective on leadership as well.»
- -»
- establishing groups based on differences»
5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- The exam»
- Requirements for the group assignments might have been more specific»
- The whole course should be revised, the course leader should bring something new, the valuable and practical and useful. Not CV evaluation»
- It felt sometimes like that the lectures were to much like eachother. The same subject could be talked about in more then one or two lectures.»
- The CV part.»
- The level of this course is very low, the teacher focused more on grammar than on actual content and reflections. Also, as reading the "best" paper of the week, it was sometimes extremely weird choices, and it seems that Christine liked when people put a lot of words down rather then focus on the actual content. After 1 week all respect and credibility for Christine was gone.
Some guest lectures were OK, but as there was no "red thread" between these, there were an extreme amount of repetition and a lack of interest arose quickly.
I think this course needs a total makeover.»
6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - Best feedback ever on the tasks. Good job Christine!!»
- Generally there was a high heap of the course, but practically no great information. Rather, very normal and usual things which been taught already through different courses.»
- disappointment would be to sum it up.»
Lectures 19 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 11% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 7 | | 41% |
++» | | 8 | | 47% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 Exercises 20 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 10% |
OK» | | 2 | | 10% |
+» | | 4 | | 20% |
++» | | 12 | | 60% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 Workshops 20 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 10% |
OK» | | 1 | | 5% |
+» | | 5 | | 26% |
++» | | 11 | | 57% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.31 Project work 20 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 5% |
OK» | | 2 | | 11% |
+» | | 7 | | 38% |
++» | | 8 | | 44% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Ask questions 19 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 11% |
OK» | | 2 | | 11% |
+» | | 7 | | 41% |
++» | | 6 | | 35% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Hand -ins 19 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 10% |
OK» | | 3 | | 15% |
+» | | 3 | | 15% |
++» | | 11 | | 57% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.21 Examination 19 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 6% |
OK» | | 5 | | 31% |
+» | | 5 | | 31% |
++» | | 5 | | 31% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 Team work 20 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 5% |
OK» | | 2 | | 10% |
+» | | 2 | | 10% |
++» | | 15 | | 75% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 Independent work 19 svarande
-» | | 3 | | 18% |
OK» | | 6 | | 37% |
+» | | 4 | | 25% |
++» | | 3 | | 18% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.43 Occasions with critique (feedback) 19 svarande
-» | | 3 | | 16% |
OK» | | 1 | | 5% |
+» | | 3 | | 16% |
++» | | 11 | | 61% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Guest lectures 20 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 10% |
OK» | | 2 | | 10% |
+» | | 3 | | 15% |
++» | | 13 | | 65% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.35 External study visits 19 svarande
-» | | 3 | | 75% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 1 | | 25% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 15 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 Other element 18 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 66% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 1 | | 33% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 15 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|