Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Kursutvärdering IEK311 Total Quality Management

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-03-16 - 2008-03-25
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Sverker Alänge»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

1. Which master program do you study?

18 svarande

Production Engineering»3 16%
Management and Economics of Innovation»5 27%
Other International Master Program»6 33%
No master program - e.g. Erasmus, Unitech, etc.»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 22%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»5 27%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»2 11%
75%»9 50%
100%»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Because Sverker changed the schedule block this course collide with the other courses which was not good.» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»2 11%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»9 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»6 33%
Large extent»10 55%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

8. To what extent did the following lecture(s) contribute to your learning?


Sverker Alänge - Quality and Change Management
18 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»3 17%
Large extent»6 35%
Great extent»6 35%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.94

Sari Scheinberg - Learning Cycles
18 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»3 20%
Large extent»3 20%
Great extent»6 40%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Martin Arvidsson - SPC and Design of Experiment
18 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»4 26%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.73

Alexander Chakhunasvili - Quality Improvement in Health Care
18 svarande

Small extent»4 28%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»1 7%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Stefan Book - Integrated Management Systems
17 svarande

Small extent»3 18%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»3 18%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Claes Berlin - Saab Space Visit
18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 27%
Large extent»5 27%
Great extent»8 44%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Tomas Holst - Communication of tools
18 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
Some extent»7 53%
Large extent»2 15%
Great extent»2 15%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 2.3

Torben Hasenkamp - Robust Design
18 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»1 7%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.64

Peter Cronemyr - Six Sigma Experiences from industry
18 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»5 33%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.86

9. To what extent did the following excercise contribute to your learning?


- especially interactive exam made us to start studying before the real exam so that we felt more relax when studying the exam»

QC and Management Tools - Compu Computer
18 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»3 20%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»3 20%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.73

KJ analysis
18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»7 50%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Helicopter lab - DoE
17 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»7 43%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Case in Integrated Management Systems
18 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»4 22%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»5 27%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Interactive examination - midterm exam
18 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»5 29%
Large extent»5 29%
Great extent»5 29%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.76

10. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»4 22%
Large extent»8 44%
Great extent»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- we could have some more articles so that we could get deeper into some of the topics.» (Large extent)
- But l suggest some of the chapters that are of little relevance for the course should be pointed out to the students and perhaps replaced with literature that of more relevance to the goals» (Great extent)
- Book was very easy to read and other articles were good as well.» (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»11 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- last minute changes shoulh be done before we came to the lecture like the changes in time or the place of the lecture.» (Rather well)
- best in mainataining literatures and updating news for the students.. i wud like to appreciate it particularly. » (Very well)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 33%
Very good»11 61%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»12 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

14. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»12 66%
High»4 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- This maybe because i had two other courses that took a lot of time.» (Low)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»10 55%
High»3 16%
Too high»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- the other courses were very loaded.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»13 72%
Excellent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- l cannot choose excellent because the course conrent, litereature could be continuously improved with the suggestions you get from this survey (that is if you find any worthy of considering).» (Good)
- Was a little sceptical about it at the beginning but i thought it was really good now when i looking back to it.» (Good)
- the course includes a lot of topics all of which are very usaful and interesting but due to the limit of time i think we had different lecturers many times which made limit us to learn deeper into topics and had prevented the consistency of the course and so sometimes we lost the concentration.» (Good)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Every thing is Good enough !»
- course content was excellent...»
- All the practical topics, KJ, CoE,PDSA and all the models»
- The DoE was really good. Focus maybe little more on control charts and how to calculate them..»
- some lessons, but i would set the course in another way, that the students can understand why there is these lesson and so on..»
- Case Study at Saab Space KJ-SHiba Interactive Examination»
- guest lectures & study visit »

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- too many projects and no grade for it.. atleast 10 points shud be awarded for all the projects and xam shud be for 90»
- The boundaries for guest lectureres. Some talked too much on the experience and rarely realte it to literature. This makes later can of abstract.»
- DOE lab. We did not get any significant results. Use eg color as one parameter and set a minimum drop height.»
- i would set the course in another way, that the students can understand why there is this lesson. Define the backbone of the course clearly»
- more articles which may be optional to read not obligotary and more consistency betweeb lectures.»

19. Additional comments

- Quality assessment and methods can be included. Personally, if i would be taught some interesting topics such as "Web-site quality assessment" instead of awards or ISO, i would be very satisfied. »
- All in all. this is on of the courses that l have developed interest in. It was more practically oriented and could be applied to almost all aspect of my life outside academic. The TQM course is really an interesting one which is not boring to follow.»
- more time may be assigned to project work. and credits could be contributed to each assignment to motivate student even better. »

20. Would you recommend this course to other students?

17 svarande

Yes»15 88%
No»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 1.11

- best ever course so far i have attended... and this is the only course entire class mingled with each other and i have gud frens cos of TQM... excellent work.. hats off to sverker, lisa and all..» (Yes)

Kursutvärderingssystem från