ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEES 1213-4 Embedded system design project, DAT096

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-29 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 10%
Around 25 hours/week»5 50%
Around 30 hours/week»4 40%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 10%
100%»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

- Of the lectures etc. relevant for the project I took part in.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%
I have not seen/read the goals»1

Genomsnitt: 2.55

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- there should be an alternative "Did not read"» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 30%
Yes, definitely»7 70%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.7

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 40%
Very good»6 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Sometimes hard to get room in lab room. We could only work with the FPGA"s in the lab room.» (Rather good)
- Questions were met with enthusiasm.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»7 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
High»7 70%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 10%
High»9 90%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Some documents seemed to be unnecessary, and many of the internal documents were not graded at all. The meeting minutes might should be checked and some parts of the planning report might be reduced to compensate for it.» (Good)
- Best course since "digital konstruktion".» (Excellent)
- Really good teachers and advicers for the project.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- -»
- Kasyab! He was very helpful throughout the project, even when we bothered him again and again with similar questions.»
- Teachers and the project!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- -»
- I can"t think of anything really. Perhaps the proposed projects (for variation)?»
- Software problem. Teachers has been informed.»

16. Additional comments

- -»
- Very good course! It was fun and interesting throughout.»
- Lena is really fast to answer and get in touch with via pingpong.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.59
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.59
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.9

Kursutvärderingssystem från