Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPWPS 1213-3 Fundamentals of photonics MCC045
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-02 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 6 | | 54% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 9% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 9% |
25%» | | 1 | | 9% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 6 | | 54% |
100%» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 11% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 22% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 6 | | 66% |
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.55 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.10 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 10% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 9 | | 90% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 10% |
To some extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 60% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5
Teaching and course administration6. What is your impression of the lectures?- A bit boring »
- Messy powerpoints. The content is very broad and shallow.»
- I attended one, too many equations and reading of power points.»
- They are not bad only a little bit slow.»
- Interesting, easy to understand (relative to the subject of course), but teacher could be more energetic»
- Could be deeper.»
- Good but I think Johan could add some more calculation examples.»
- Many of the lectures just gave a brief overview of the subject»
- Teacher seemed unprepared for the lectures and didn"t add much to what was said on the slides. Didn"t attend many lectures due to this.»
- good»
- Hard for me to stay awake»
7. What is your impression of the numerical tutorials?- Good»
- Crucial for the HA.»
- Excellent!»
- Jörgen is a very good teacher and his classes are very usefull. His practical examples are imposible to be forgotten»
- Very good teacher, interesting, appreciated the "real-time" matlab examples and the presentation of the "HA-solutions"»
- Very good.»
- Nothing I would change»
- Far better than the lectures.»
- Very thorough and gave a good foundation to solve the problems presented.»
- very good»
- Interesting»
8. What is your impression of the exercises?- Good but maybe we could prepared some so we could do even more exercises»
- Good teacher. Could have been more of the same kind.»
- They were good and well structured»
- Are usefull and the teacher teach well.»
- teacher could be more energetic, good explanations/presentations»
- Ok.»
- I didnt really have any time to look over the exercises.»
- I did not like the part that we had to discuss questions in groups»
- Very good coverage of the material.»
- He should work more on board than discussing with the class.»
- Good enough. Maybe Tobias should explain the methodology he will follow to solve a problem before he starts»
9. What is your impression of the laboratory exercise?- It was great to work by group of 3 in it and interesting manipulations!»
- I liked it!»
- Is very well though»
- helps a lot to understand the material from the course, interesting experiments, good "supervisor/teacher"»
- Good.»
- I wouldn"t change anything.»
- A mirror alignment nightmare»
- Well presented and gave a better understanding of the material presented in the course.»
- Good»
- Very interesting»
10. What is your impression of the home assignments?- Sometimes they were really difficult»
- Interesting.»
- They were good»
- A little bit hard.»
- helps a lot to understand the material from the course, very funny/motivating assignments»
- Very good.»
- Well, I was not able to do any exercises because of the home assignments. I learnt a lot but at the same time, it took a while to get them done.»
- There were ok but the workload was rather unequal between them»
- Challenging but good.»
- Good»
- Most of them, were very interesting and gave a good intuition about photonics.»
11. What is your impression of the final exam?- Really tough»
- I think the exam was too long. I wasnt able to fiinish. Else but that, it was good»
- It´,s ok»
- difficulcy okay»
- Ok.»
- It was good, a bit harder that expected (compared to the older ones)»
- I think the amount of problems was too much for the given time»
- Hard but fair.»
- Last year 30% (6 out of 2) questions were repeated. This time no repetition of previous questions and the pass percentage is 50%!!! Although we have a bonus but how that helped!!
Moreover the question was a bit lengthy.»
- Average difficulty, but someone should have much more time to be able to think clearly and solve correctly all of the problems.»
12. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 36% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63
Study climate14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 71% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 16. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 54% |
High» | | 4 | | 36% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 17. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 9% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 9% |
High» | | 7 | | 63% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.9
Summarizing questions18. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 9% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 18% |
Good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Exercises and even if think we should have more of this»
- The numerical tutorials. It was really helpful for learning»
- It is ok like now.»
- numerical tutorial + HAs»
- Numerical tutorials.»
- The normal tutorials.»
- Jorgen"s numerical tutorials»
- Numerical tutorals, lab, exercises and home assignments.»
- Numerical tutorials»
- The assignments. Were interesting»
20. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The way the lectures are structured»
- The assigments could be a little bit soft.»
- Go deeper, and remove some basics (like Maxwell).»
- Johan"s slides were really good but I think he would be able to capture the audience better if he added some more calculation examples. The board does seem a bit old fashion but it does help us students a lot.»
- I would like the course to go into more details on the subjects and not just give a brief overview but then again that"s a general Chalmers problem with its quarters policy»
- Lecture teachers preperation»
- The tutorial guy»
- The number of the assignments. I believe that you could skip 1 of them to reduce the workload during the term.»
21. Additional comments- The HAs was interesting and relevant, but took a large part of the avalilible study time.»
- I really enjoy it and I have learned a lot.»
- kind of "unfair" that it was allowed to bring the book in the exam, although there are not enough copies for every student available at the library. Either take care of that or do an exam where one does not need the book would be better, in my opinion»
- Good course, but time consuming.»
- The course was very interesting and i can say i learned many things out of it. In general everything worked quite well. Johan"s teaching was kinda boring although he always gave good explanations whenever asked.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.72
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.72 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|