Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Compressible flow, TME085
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-03-11 - 2008-03-20 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65% Kontaktperson: Lars-Erik Eriksson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.13 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 15% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 5 | | 38% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 5 | | 38% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - I had two other rather intensive courses in addition to this course» (Around 25 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 7% |
75%» | | 4 | | 30% |
100%» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 4.53 - I missed the first week of lectures» (75%)
- Not quite 100 %» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?13 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 23% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 23% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - but they where chainged in the end» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- At least after the content is known» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.12 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 12 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?12 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 11 | | 91% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 3.08 - I was expecting the throat area relatiosn for the nozzle problems» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 38% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 2.92 - course book and lecture fit well together» (Large extent)
- Excellent text book» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 23% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 76% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - Thanks, Martin!» (Very well)
- There was a problem with the uploading of lecture notes but it was a technical problem» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 92% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 53% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - worked on the Assignments alone» (Rather well)
- especially excellent work with my group mate, but with other students as well!» (Very well)
11. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 69% |
High» | | 3 | | 23% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.15 - I had this in line with two other intensive courses» (High)
12. How was the total workload this study period?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 53% |
High» | | 5 | | 38% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - I had this in line with two other intensive courses» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - I would prefer a little less theoretical fluid mechanics. I think it should be familiar to everyone in this course from basic fluid mechanic courses.» (Excellent)
- I really enjoyed this cousre» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- everything»
- Exercises were very good, especially the "fluent" one»
- The assignments, where the understanding of the content was tested»
- lecture and assignment are good»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- nothing»
- Maybe a sample exam can be given on the website
»
- The assignments could be more testing/teaching understanding.
Less derivations on the lectures.
Exercises should mix examples with more exercises, since the examples are already solved in the book.»
- prepare theory questions that students can work with during the course. The questions should be guideline to be learn for the final exam.»
- The teaching should change. Most of the class the teacher was deriving equations which were completely elaborated also in the book. I suggest that the teacher should show the derivations quickly with slides and discuss about the meanings and the physical results of the equations more. In fact there was no time for discussions.»
- I think writing the examples on the board in räkenovning is not very efficient. The problems should rather be calculated there, the examples are quite well explained in the book.»
16. Additional comments- great course but the last two questions really threw me, and because i did mine in a separate room due to an exam clash, i was unable to ask for clarity»
- Martin was great as well, helped and clarified a lot!»
- I didn"t get why we did the assignment 1 and 3 in Matlab. Why didn"t we used Fluent instead? I think it will be more practical if we used Fluent.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|