ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MTF114 Heat transfer, MTF114

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-12 - 2013-04-05
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Håkan Nilsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 30%
Around 25 hours/week»5 50%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Läste dock 3 kurser denna Lp så skulle lagt mer om jag hunnit.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- The workload has been very high! Especially when I have been working alot with my bachelor project. The workload has been too high when you compare it with the learning outcomes of our computerprojects.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0-25%»0 0%
25-50%»1 10%
50-75%»4 40%
75-100%»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The exercsies has been badly organized and the teacher for theis exercsies has not been prepared properly! Therefore I think most of the exercises has been a waste of time.» (75-100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

The examination includes the written examination, the computer exercise reports, and the computer project presentation and report.

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»5 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- Somehow I think it is useless to learn correlations and equations by mind and this is the only way how to cope with the theory part. It would be better to give less questions and make sure that the derivations are understood and that they have a connection to the things we are calculating. Just to name one example the "extra correlations in the transport equattion for turbulent flow" , never were part of a problem, which we tackeled and for me there was no point to learn these equations and for sure it was also not possible for me to understand, what stands behind them.» (To some extent)
- The exam was too focused on the theoretical part of this course. » (To some extent)
- Vore bra om teoriupg hade siffra 1-3 efter hur viktiga de är, känns som om den teorin, t.ex skriva på dimensionslös form, inte speglar vad som är viktigast att kunna med värmeöverföring då sådan typ av upg ändå examinerades.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the *lectures* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

7. To what extent has the *exercises* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»5 50%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- actually no extent! » (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the *computer exercises* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The learing outcomes of the computer exercies has been few and has of small help to prepare you for the exam. They have on the other hand been quite fun and they have given me the motivation to learn more about this subject.» (Small extent)

9. To what extent has the *computer project* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
Some extent»5 50%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- same as before» (Small extent)

10. To what extent has the *course literature* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 60%
Great extent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The course litterature has been of great help. » (Large extent)

11. To what extent has the *lecture notes* been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- We had a good teacher and the lecture notes has been the best source of information in this course.» (Great extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The amount of information on the course web page has been good but I would like to have more exams from previous years and with the right answers!» (Rather well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 20%
Rather good»4 40%
Very good»4 40%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»7 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

15. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»2 20%
High»4 40%
Too high»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Kändes som om onödigt mycket tid lades på att modellera i icem då man visste vad man skulle göra men inte varför man gjorde endel steg och därför visste man inte vad som skulle ändras om något blev fel. Kanske ordna en mer utförlig turtorial till computer exercise 1 som också säger VARFÖR vi bör göra vad vi gör.» (Adequate)
- Just studied this course, maybe high if I had studied one more. » (Adequate)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»1 11%
Too high»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4

- had 3 courses » (High)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»7 70%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The subject has been intresting and fun. The lectures too. But the combination of high workload and worthless exercises made this course harder then it should. This course has been a long time of frustration.» (Poor)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Håkan Nilsson»
- exercises, project»
- The computer exercises were good, but the project was a little too much. You never had time over for selfstudying.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- theory questions»
- Better, more well prepared exercises and computer exercises with more learing outcome. If this is changed I think the workload is OK.»
- Införa liknande arbete med teorifrågor som i strömningsmekaniken då inlämningar (icke obligatoriska) kunde göras av utvalda teorifrågor varje från varje veckas föreläsning. Om alla inlämningar gjorts och svaren är ok ger det också något poäng till tentan. Det upplägget fungerade iaf väldigt bra i strömningsmekaniken och man jobbade kontinuerligt med teorin under hela kursen.»
- less derivations in the theory part. some of them are just stupid learning by mind, that"s senseless!»
- Better exercises, the teacher wasn"t prepared and hadn"t structured anything. I think many noticed this and as I, we instead read the solutions from the website. Also for the computer exercises the teacher should have done them or at least gone through them before having class. The help we got wasn"t good. I was most of the time confused. We could have learned so much more, which I hope the students next year will. And I think we should have a teacher that knows the subject better, a comment from him "I have never done this before" or when he said try 100 then it was 15 000 000. We wasted a lot of time doing unecessary things. »
- Less computer exercises or no project. »

20. If you also attended ENM025 - Energy conversion / Energiomvandling, relate the two courses.

Was it good/bad to take both courses?
How can we improve the relation between the two courses?

- It was very good to take both courses. If I haven"t, I wouldn"t pass this course...»

21. Additional comments

- all in all, i learned a lot in this course! But it is very hard to attend to another course, because the computer project and the preparation for the exam take a lot of time!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från