Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TKIEK 1213-3 Technology and society TEK225
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-02 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.4 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 75% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 25% |
50%» | | 1 | | 25% |
75%» | | 2 | | 50% |
100%» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - I stopped going to the lectures because they were useless and boring.» (50%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?4 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 25% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 50% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 2 | | 66% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 25% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 25% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - I have not read the goals, but since I passed the course even though I did NOT learn anything useful in the course the examination can not have tested whether I have reached them.» (No, not at all)
Examination: Project and take hom exam6. How long time did you spend on all 3 take home exams combined together?4 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
20-30 hours» | | 2 | | 50% |
30-40 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
More than 40 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 7. How long time did you spend on the project?4 svarande
Less than 10 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
10-20 hours» | | 2 | | 50% |
20-30 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
30-40 hours» | | 0 | | 0% |
More than 40 hours» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 8. What grade would you give the take home exam as a means to learning?4 svarande
Very bad» | | 1 | | 25% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Average» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - The questions were formulated in a way that only encouraged writing a lot of words without meaning. » (Very bad)
9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?4 svarande
Very bad» | | 1 | | 25% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Average» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - The task description was unclear and it was only boring.» (Very bad)
Teaching and course administration10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - The lectures were the most pointless that I have attended during my time at Chalmers.» (Small extent)
11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 25% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - It is not very clever to use the student portal!» (Rather badly)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 50% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?4 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - There were some students talking a lot during the lectures and also during the presentations but there was no reaction from the lecturer which I found strange. » (Rather well)
15. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 50% |
High» | | 2 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - But it would have been better to start with the home exams earlier. » (Adequate)
- It was high because of the late introduction of the project and home exams, as the first two weeks had nothing and then everything came at once.» (High)
16. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
High» | | 2 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - I took two other courses this period because I did not want to skip a real course for this nonsense. » (Too high)
Summarizing questions17. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 25% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It is the worst course I have taken during my almost four years at Chalmers.» (Poor)
18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The take home exams were very good,as a means of learning.»
- Nothing! »
19. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Please try to be harder on people who don"t respect the time limit for the presentations. It is very annoying when the duration of the seminar is calculated by the assumption that everybody"s presentations will be 10 min long but most groups go on for almost 20. I think it is up to the lecturer to interrupt when a group has used the time set up for them.»
- Everything! The course should not be given again! It is a waste of time to read this course when there exist courses in which you actually learn something.»
20. Additional comments- I think the take home exam is quite time consuming together with the reflection paper, this makes the course a high workload.»
- I decided to read this course because of the MTS-requirement and I can NOT see any other reason to read it.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|