|
ENKÄTER
|
|
|
Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Heat and Power Systems Engineering, MEN 120
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-03-11 - 2008-03-20 Antal svar: 12 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32% Kontaktperson: Klas Andersson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort and qualifications1. How many hours peer week did you spend on this course?12 svarande
At most 15 hours» | | 1 | | 8% |
About 20 hours» | | 7 | | 58% |
About 25 hours» | | 3 | | 25% |
At least 30 hours» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?12 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 8% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 4 | | 33% |
100%» | | 7 | | 58% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 3. Do you consider that you hade sufficient knowledge to read this course?12 svarande
Yes, absolutely» | | 10 | | 83% |
In part, but I struggled in places» | | 2 | | 16% |
No» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.16
Goals and goal fulfilment4. How understandable are the course goals?12 svarande
I have not seen/read the course goals» | | 3 | | 25% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be more clear» | | 7 | | 58% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?9 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 11% |
Yes, the goals seem reasnoable» | | 8 | | 88% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.88 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?10 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 10% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 40% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 50% |
I don"t know, I have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4
teaching methods7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?12 svarande
small extent» | | 3 | | 25% |
some extent» | | 5 | | 41% |
large extent» | | 3 | | 25% |
great extent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 8. To what extent has the course literature been of help for your learning?12 svarande
small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
some extent» | | 5 | | 41% |
large extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
great extent» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 9. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?12 svarande
small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
some extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
large extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
great extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 10. What was your overall impression of the lectures?11 svarande
Excellent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Moderate» | | 3 | | 27% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.18 11. What was your overall impression of the case study?12 svarande
Excellent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Good» | | 4 | | 33% |
Moderate» | | 6 | | 50% |
Poor» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.58 12. What did you think of the study visit at Åbyverket?12 svarande
Very interesting» | | 1 | | 8% |
Fairly interesting» | | 8 | | 66% |
Not interesting» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 13. How well did the course administration and homepage work?12 svarande
Excellent» | | 5 | | 41% |
Good» | | 4 | | 33% |
Moderate» | | 3 | | 25% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.83
Teaching staff and guest lecturers14. Please rate Filip Johnsson"s lectures11 svarande
Excellent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Moderate» | | 2 | | 18% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 15. Please rate Klas Anderssons lectures11 svarande
Excellent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Moderate» | | 2 | | 18% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 16. Please rate the guest lectures by Lars Strömberg11 svarande
Excellent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Good» | | 4 | | 36% |
Moderate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.36 17. Please rate the guest lecture by Anders Wik11 svarande
Excellent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Moderate» | | 3 | | 27% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.18 18. Please rate Nicklas Simonssons Guest lecture10 svarande
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 7 | | 70% |
Moderate» | | 3 | | 30% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.3 19. Please rate the tutoring during the case study11 svarande
Excellent» | | 2 | | 18% |
Good» | | 4 | | 36% |
Moderate» | | 4 | | 36% |
Poor» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.36
Study climate20. What did you think about the work load in the case study?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 8% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 66% |
High» | | 3 | | 25% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 21. What did you think about the overall work load in the course?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 50% |
High» | | 3 | | 25% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 22. How was the work load this study period?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 25% |
High» | | 3 | | 25% |
Too High» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 23. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?12 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 2 | | 16% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 16% |
Very Good» | | 6 | | 50% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 24. How well has the cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?12 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 41% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 58% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.58
Summarizing questions25. What is your overall impression of the course?12 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 8% |
Good» | | 10 | | 83% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 3 26. What improvements can be made to next year?27. What should definitely be preserved to next year?
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|
|
|