Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1213-3 Tabletop interaction CIU245

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-02
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 12%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 50%
Around 30 hours/week»1 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Nothing to do until the project begun. Too easy labs» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»8 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 33%
I have not seen/read the goals»2

Genomsnitt: 2.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 28%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1

Genomsnitt: 2.71


6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Should be more guided sessions like in the Tangible-course» (Small extent)
- The theory part of the lectures was helpful. However the course really need teachers on the programming/designing side in class to help.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the labs been of help for your learning?


- You learnt the software but we could easily have had double the workload or more. (I have a SE-background and is used to coding)»
- Labs structured should be re-thought to better involve each participant. They were not the best for group work, except for lab 3.»
- Labs are too vague. Following examples from a book is not very good for learning. Labs could be individual instead.»
- The labs were all done by the programmers which knew what they do. Following the book wasn"t really interesting. It would have been nice to do some very small projects/app and try out stuff or invest more time into the project. The sweden region compare project was nice but took a lot of time to execute. It was hard to do it in one week.»

Lab 1
8 svarande

Very Low»0 0%
Low»2 25%
Rather low»2 25%
Adequate»2 25%
Rather high»2 25%
High»0 0%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Lab 2
8 svarande

Very Low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Rather low»3 37%
Adequate»2 25%
Rather high»2 25%
High»0 0%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Lab 3
8 svarande

Very Low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Rather low»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
Rather high»1 12%
High»2 25%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Lab 4
8 svarande

Very Low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Rather low»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Rather high»2 25%
High»2 25%
Very high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 4.87

8. To what extent has the project been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Rather low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Rather high»4 50%
High»1 12%
Very high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 5.87

- It was good to put in practice what learned in theory and to try to achieve a small application working.» (Rather high)

9. To what extent has the literature seminar been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Rather low»1 14%
Adequate»3 42%
Rather high»2 28%
High»1 14%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- The papers are not really that interesting. They all try to find some best practices but in the end, every app is different and should find their own interface solutions. A good IXDler should be able to get it right. More helpful would be to keep the papers to a minimum and try to critique other tabletop apps and find good and bad aspects.» (Rather low)

10. To what extent has the tutoring by Touchtech been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»2 25%
Rather low»1 12%
Adequate»2 25%
Rather high»2 25%
High»1 12%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- Never had any questions on early labs» (Low)
- the tutoring should be in school and more accessible. if not possible it should be more focused on the project time.» (Low)
- Touchtech did a really good job but the dates were really bad. There should have been one in the beginning and then some time till the next one to ask questions for the project.» (Rather high)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The book was somewhat poorly written but still had some good tutorials and exercises» (Large extent)

Course administration

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 25%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- The course needs to improve the structure. However the core is good. the deadlines and guidelines for hand-ins should be clearly defined early in the course.» (Rather badly)
- Instructions were unfortunately available very late most of the time.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»5 71%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»1

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- in the first lecture a guy was presented that would help out during the course, but I only saw him once after that, at the final presentation. Having someone to ask questions (C#/WPF) about the labs and during the project would have been good» (Rather poor)
- Good with the touchtech sessions but I"d (personally) rather wish we had guided sessions with teachers available.» (Rather poor)
- having professionals to advise is good but their time is of course limited. they might be better as guest lecturers than tutors.» (Rather poor)
- Touchtech"s availability was very limited and at the wrong time in the course» (Rather poor)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 25%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- too large gropups for the labs. some did not work much» (Rather poorly)
- Not much teamwork until we began work on the project (none needed as labs were simple and doable on your own)» (Rather poorly)
- the group was nicely selected through skills.» (Rather well)
- Group work worked very well. The skill distribution was good.» (Very well)

15. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»1 12%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»4 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- In the end it was hard to get the app done. At least many of the Milestones were dropped.» (High)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- good course but need improvement and refinement. It also need a tabletop to be fully accessible from the class and tutoring in place.» (Adequate)
- The opportunity to work on the tabletop was very nice but it depends on the student to learn all the stuff and finish projects in the limited time.» (Good)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Literature seminars (its great that they are spread out). Projects, with some additional time»
- the group creation from skills.»
- The connection to touchtec, but make it better and at more important times (like during the project work)»
- project work and group distribution»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More labs and more tutoring sessions»
- tutoring and tabletop availability.»
- Time for project should be longer. Look at simulation engines for example where the project is the course basically. Then the help from Touchtech would be much more helpful.»
- Need more time with the pixelsense and also get weekly help with implementation»
- less papers The introduction to the development wasn"t really useful. Maybe that can be changed. Literature seminars could even be changed so that students give introductions to the programming instead.»

20. Additional comments

- I don"t think there should be a tabletop course unless we have full access to a Microsoft Pixelsense or similar device during the course. One hour each week is a complete disaster»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.12

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.12
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.53

Kursutvärderingssystem från