ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Patents and innovation engineering (SA)

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-06 - 2013-03-15
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 28%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»1 14%
To some extent»1 14%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- We have not yet (it is just one day left of the course) received any feedback at all even though our first assignment were handed in in the early beginning of the course. This is totally unacceptable!. I will not recommend anyone to take this course because of this!» (No, not at all)
- We havent had any exams but I prefer groupwork etc more» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»1 16%
Some extent»4 66%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I do not know, have not received any feedback.» (?)
- I havent read all of it and instead I read some other articles from the guide book about IP and finance such as how IP deals are made in the market place. » (Some extent)

Study climate

5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 28%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

6. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 33%
Adequate»2 33%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- I do not know, have not received any feedback..» (?)
- I think it could have been more» (Low)

Specific lectures

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

7. IA Audit report (Erik Hansson, CIP PS)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 42%
4»4 57%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Was to much content for that short time, we raced through the slides. » (3)

8. Introduction to patent strategy (Henrik Olsson, Volvo)

7 svarande

1»2 28%
2»1 14%
3»1 14%
4»3 42%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- It"s a shame that it was more or less exactly the same lecture that he held for the CSE students during the fall. » (4)

9. Patent management pt.1 (Ulf Petrusson, Gothenburg University)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 42%
3»0 0%
4»4 57%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

10. Patent landscape analysis (Benno Jensen, Thomson Reuters)

7 svarande

1»1 14%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»1 14%
5»2 28%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

11. Patent drafting (Tommy Somlo, Awapatent)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 57%
4»1 14%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. Actors and institutions on the administrative arena (Christoffer Hermansson, Gothenburg University)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»2 28%
4»1 14%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

13. Patents in manufacturing industries (Martin Jansson, SKF)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 14%
3»2 28%
4»1 14%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

14. Patent litigation in Sweden (Martin Tranälv & Markus Östergren, Awapatent)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 28%
3»2 28%
4»2 28%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

15. Introduction to licensing (Christina Berggren, MAQS)

7 svarande

1»1 14%
2»2 28%
3»1 14%
4»2 28%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- It was a little bit too late» (2)
- The lecture was good, but it was a shame that it was given after the licensing agreement was handed in. Had it been given in advance it would have been a great help, now it was more or less feedback on what you had managed to find out that you needed to do. » (4)

16. Patent management pt. 2 (Ulf Petrusson, Gothenburg University)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 57%
4»2 28%
5»0 0%
No opinion/Did not attend»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

17. Litigation and infringement (Marcus Malek & Johan Örneblad)

7 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 28%
5»5 71%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

- Really nice with such an applicable task. It would have been even better if we focused more on it. » (5)

18. Additional comments

- Would be helpful to get back assignments during the course as to adjust ones performance if needed rather than stumble in the dark the whole time hoping what you deliver to be what the teacher expects of you. »
- N/A»
- Good communication with Erik about the SIM C, and that it was at the same time as GAIUS, think about that next year, the fair will probably be roughly the same time. For the hand-in we got instead of SIM C the instructions weren"t very clear, and then one student e-mailed and got more detailed instructions. ONE student, nothing on pingpong or any other channels. Some heard about this through him, but isn"t it unprofessional to hand out further instructions to only one student? It seems unfair to me.. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från