ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Patents and innovation engineering (Chalmers), CIP061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-06 - 2013-03-15
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 50%
100%»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»2 50%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2

Study climate

5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

6. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Specific lectures

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

7. IA Audit report (Erik Hansson, CIP PS)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 75%
4»0 0%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- OK start» (3)

8. Introduction to patent strategy (Henrik Olsson, Volvo)

4 svarande

1»1 25%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»0 0%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- almost exact the same class we had this fall» (1)

9. Patent management pt.1 (Ulf Petrusson, Gothenburg University)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. Patent landscape analysis (Benno Jensen, Thomson Reuters)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. Patent drafting (Tommy Somlo, Awapatent)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 50%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. Actors and institutions on the administrative arena (Christoffer Hermansson, Gothenburg University)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

13. Patents in manufacturing industries (Martin Jansson, SKF)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»2 66%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

14. Patent litigation in Sweden (Martin Tranälv & Markus Östergren, Awapatent)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

15. Introduction to licensing (Christina Berggren, MAQS)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»0 0%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- probably good, but since it was postponed until after the assignment it didn"t gave that much, » (2)

16. Patent management pt. 2 (Ulf Petrusson, Gothenburg University)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%
No opinion/Did not attend»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

17. Litigation and infringement (Marcus Malek & Johan Örneblad)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 50%
4»0 0%
5»2 50%
No opinion/Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- So far really good» (5)

18. Additional comments

- Really bad that we still haven"t received any feedback or results on our group or individual work. that is not okej at all, and it is hard to know what is expected from us when we get nothing back. Really really bad!!»
- Would have been nice to have gotten some feedback for the assignments before answering this. I have a generally vague expression about the course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från