ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Intellectual property and innovation strategies, TEK350

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-08 - 2013-03-15
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 24%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 15%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 46%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 30%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 7%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 1 7%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 5 38%

100%» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 4 30%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 38%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 8%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 11 91%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all» 2 15%

To some extent» 3 23%

Yes, definitely» 0 0%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 1 7%

Some extent» 6 46%

Large extent» 5 38%

Great extent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 5 38%

Some extent» 5 38%

Large extent» 3 23%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly» 2 15%

Rather badly» 1 7%

Rather well» 8 61%

Very well» 2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

Specific lectures

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

Week 1

9. Intro to IP and Innovation Strategies ( Bo Heiden)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 9%

3» 2 18%

4» 3 27%

5» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- N/A» (?)

10. Case introduction (Bo Heiden)

10 svarande

1» 1 10%

2» 1 10%

3» 3 30%

4» 3 30%

5» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- N/A» (?)
- Still did not get what the assignment was. Need to introduce things in the course in the right order. » (1)
- Based on that lecture it was difficult to understand what we were supposed to do in the case.» (2)

11. Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Mats Lundqvist)

11 svarande

1» 1 9%

2» 3 27%

3» 3 27%

4» 2 18%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- repitition» (1)
- ok, but what was the purpose?» (3)
- Great introduction to the connection between innovation and entrepreneurship.» (4)
- Good, but felt irrelevant to the rest of the course» (4)
- I really like this lecture, interesting, many examples, I learnt a lot» (5)

Week 2

12. Patents and Innovation (Ulf Petrusson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 9%

3» 3 27%

4» 4 36%

5» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Very good, should just have had more time.» (5)
- First, really good lecture» (5)

13. Patents as a tool for business intelligence (Bo Heiden)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 18%

3» 5 45%

4» 2 18%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- repitition» (2)

14. Innovation and Patent Exercises (Christoffer Hermansson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 9%

3» 2 18%

4» 5 45%

5» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Should see to that all questions is discussed.» (4)
- Very good to go through the exercises in class» (5)

Week 3

15. Databases and Biobanks (Boo Edgar)

12 svarande

1» 6 50%

2» 6 50%

3» 0 0%

4» 0 0%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- Did not provide any value at all. Could been used for patents/copyright.» (1)
- Did not really understand the connection to the course.» (1)
- what was the purpose? hard to see the linkage to other classes. » (2)

16. Legal basics Copyright (Erik Ullberg)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 3 27%

4» 6 54%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Clear and straightforward.» (5)
- very good and helpful for the exercises» (5)

17. Copyright Exercises (Christoffer Hermansson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 3 27%

4» 5 45%

5» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4

- good and learned a lot» (5)

Week 4

18. Legal basics Trademark (Lars Andersson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 5 45%

4» 4 36%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

19. Legal basics Design Rights (Lars Andersson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 5 45%

4» 4 36%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

20. Brands and Branding strategies (Lars Andersson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 6 54%

4» 3 27%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

21. Trademark and Design exercises (Lars Andersson)

11 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 36%

4» 5 45%

5» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- good discussion, maybe too much information so good to write down, present the answers in powerpoint? Have some guideline afterwards. » (3)

Week 5

22. Open Innovation and collaboration (Thomas Hedner)

11 svarande

1» 4 36%

2» 3 27%

3» 4 36%

4» 0 0%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Did not provide any value» (1)
- What was the point of this lecture? Way too long!» (1)

23. Technology trend analysis (Johan Nilsson, Pavel Kopylov)

12 svarande

1» 4 33%

2» 3 25%

3» 5 41%

4» 0 0%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- Simply not much of a point when it"s held that late.» (1)
- Lecturers can unprepared. Totally unnecessary to have this lecture so late in the course. Should have been very early, so it could be used in the case.» (1)
- This was totally misplaced, should have been held before we started the patent search» (1)
- nothing wrong about the lecture as such but way too late» (2)
- The lecture was ok, but it should have taken place earlier in the course.» (3)
- The lecture should have been held earlier since it would have been provided valuable insights for the case, now it was a little bit too late.» (3)

Week 6

24. From trade secrets and NDAs to creating a company (Lars Andersson)

12 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 6 50%

4» 5 41%

5» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

25. Summing up lecture (Bo Heiden)

12 svarande

1» 2 16%

2» 3 25%

3» 4 33%

4» 1 8%

5» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Did not provide anything at all.» (1)
- interesting, but no summing up? only presented something new. » (1)
- Thought it would include some repetition» (3)
- Good, but tips regarding the case could have been presented earlier.» (3)

26. - Summing up exercises (Christoffer Hermansson)

12 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 33%

4» 3 25%

5» 5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- just talking, would have been better to go through them together as well. » (3)
- It was useful to go through an old exam.» (4)

Week 7

27. Case consultations (Christoffer Hermansson, Bo Heiden)

12 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 8%

3» 6 50%

4» 4 33%

5» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Did not help us at all. Should be more structured.» (2)

Study climate

28. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 8%

Rather good» 5 41%

Very good» 4 33%

I did not seek help» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

29. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly» 1 8%

Rather poorly» 1 8%

Rather well» 7 58%

Very well» 3 25%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

30. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low» 1 7%

Low» 1 7%

Adequate» 7 53%

High» 3 23%

Too high» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

31. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low» 1 7%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 23%

High» 8 61%

Too high» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Summarizing questions

32. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor» 1 7%

Fair» 1 7%

Adequate» 5 38%

Good» 4 30%

Excellent» 2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

33. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The excersizes (Copyright, trademark etc.) give a good overview of the course goal i think. »
- The basics of the rights»
- I think all parts should be preserved to the next year except the lecture on open innovation and databases and biobanks. It felt that those lectures fell outside the scope of the course. Maybe it"s possible to change the content of the lectures a bit.»
- The exercises.»
- Exercises! They was very valuable.»
- Dynamics lectures, examples of real cases, case, weekly exercices»
- The excercises and some of the practical elements»
- Lectures by Bo, Lars and Mats, and the exercises with Christoffer was where I feel like I was learning a lot.»
- The exercises!»
- the cases are very good and those you learned to most from. »

34. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- repitition, layout of exercise, scope of course»
- The case! I think the case should be more narrow. It was a bit "spretigt" and hard to understand what was really the aim of the case.»
- The guestlecturers should be replaced, so that the contents relates to the course. But better yet, they should not be there at all, and use more time on copyright, patents, trademark etc.»
- some lectures not interesting, many changes in schedule, lecture too short(30 minutes)»
- The case, to much people in each group, too vague description.»
- I would have liked a little more focused assignment, at least the firt part of it. Though I guess it is educating to work like this with people you don"t really know :) Also, the Thomson-stuff never really made any sense. And I don"t think it is fair to have the swedish students buy a 6-700 SEK book they don"t really need in the course...»
- The case, it was difficult to understand what to do and the technology field was too advanced. You had to spend more time on understanding the technology than understanding how patents and IP rights actually works.»
- Have lectures in the right order and be clear about the purpose of the lecture. What is the connection to the course? »

35. Additional comments

- The contents of the course are very interesting, and I definitely see the value in having knowledge about IP etc. Unfortunately, there is to much focus on unnecessary stuff(guest-lectures that does not provide any value), and should be more centered around the different types of intellectual properties. Also, the case is far to hard. I see the value in "struggling", because it gives an accurate picture of how complicated this business is. However, my general perception from fellow students, is that it is to hard, and therefore the focus is not on actually learning and handing in a good result, but rather just delivering "something" regardless of quality. But the principle of the case is very good though. »
- Thanks for a nice course, I really feel it has contributed with new knowledge to my education (I"m a MEI-student), and I believe I will have use of this knowledge in my civil life as well.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.38

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.38
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.59

Kursutvärderingssystem från