Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Corrosion, KBT065, sp3 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 43%
Around 20 hours/week»4 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 25%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»1 6%
25%»1 6%
50%»3 18%
75%»3 18%
100%»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»8 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.31

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 27%
Yes, definitely»8 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»10 62%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»9 56%
Very well»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 12%
Rather good»3 18%
Very good»9 56%
I did not seek help»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 26%
Very well»11 73%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»14 87%
High»1 6%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»12 75%
High»3 18%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 12%
Adequate»7 43%
Good»5 31%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.43 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Poster project was a fun and different way to present your work. Feels like a more useful thing to know than just write a report as in all other courses.»
- Jans lectures was very good, even tough he spoke sligthly too fast.»
- The poster projects.»
- The exercices for HTC. THe lectures on video where very good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The calculation exercises in aqueous corrosion. It is not useful to hold a lecture if only the people in the first row can actually see what"s written on the board and the teacher refuses to write with larger letters.»
- The laboration papers was not avaialable on Ping-Pong. Gunnar should have the same schedule as Jan, with a lecture and excerise half the time.»
- It would be good to have a summary in the end of the course.»

16. Additional comments

- I attended the course two years ago but did not write the exam. This year I am doing my master thesis so I just wrote the exam»
- Overall the course wasn"t bad but the attitude of some of the teachers really need to change. The teacher should be there to help the students, not only because he has to be there. That include writing on the boars so that everyone (or at least more than 10% of the class) can see what"s written on the board. Also if someone in the "questions before exam"-lecture asks you to do an exercise you do it, even if you don"t think its relevant. Also the supervisors that was supposed to help with the poster project didn"t feel very excited about this task. They basically didn"t even bother to read the posters and didn"t give a lot of constructive criticism. All the work was done by the students and very little input from supervisors.»
- Would be good to have more exercises to do.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.43

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.43
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6

Kursutvärderingssystem från