Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biorefinery, KBT145, sp3 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik med fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 75%
Around 20 hours/week»2 16%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.41

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 9%
50%»2 18%
75%»4 36%
100%»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 77%
No, the goals are set too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»4 33%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»5 41%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»3 27%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»7 58%
Rather badly»2 16%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 25%
Rather good»1 8%
Very good»5 41%
I did not seek help»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»5 41%
Very well»5 41%
I did not seek cooperation»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»1 8%
Low»2 16%
Adequate»8 66%
High»1 8%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»1 8%
Low»2 16%
Adequate»5 41%
High»3 25%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»2 16%
Fair»4 33%
Adequate»4 33%
Good»2 16%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The study trip, gives a good insight in the biorefinery»
- The trip to Borregaard.»
- - study visit to Norway - project was nice»
- The study-visit»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Tuve Matsson. He did not prepare his lecture and was unable of answering questions»
- The exam questions should focus more on biorefinery concepts not "draw a picture of this process" questions. »
- There was no course homepage. I also feel that there was to much focus on details rather than the big perspective of what biorefinery actually is. Too much of the exam was on details which made it extremly difficult to study the course as you had no idea what to focus on. »
- The course should have a working webpage, the goals of the course should be clearer (i could not find them anywhere) Better explaination of the project and how important it is to attend all of the presentations. »
- - work with the internet and handouts!! - Exam was horrible (language skills and style of asking the questions.)»
- The course page, hand-outs should be online, more (clear) information about the project»
- Use the course homepage»

16. Additional comments

- It is just a little info about many topics, a large extent of the info I allready knew»
- It was difficult to study the text material because there was not a course page that you could look at. The course book was not good.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.5

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.37

Kursutvärderingssystem från