ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Food microbiology, KLI021, sp3 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 42%
Around 25 hours/week»3 42%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 28%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 42%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 20%
Yes, definitely»3 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 57%
Very good»3 42%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Very good with lecturers from the food industry mixed with academia. »
- Labs were fun and interesting.»
- good powerpoint presentations»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- It is always good to have a Q&A-hour a few days before the exam!»
- TP4:adhesion: too long time to wait between the different experiments»
- Regarding to the manner how Richard teached us, the questions about his part were quit hard. »

16. Additional comments

- The in class discussion was very good, but a little more time to prepare would have been good. Very good teachers/labinstructors in this course»
- The laborations were fun and interesting! However, the first 2 labs were very basic and the last two much more challenging. It was good to get to practise the basics but I also feel that I want to learn more new skills. It would have been good to get some more guidelines for the adhesion-report. I am still confused about translating fluorescence into amount of cells/cm2. »
- Very interesting course with a resonable workload. »
- very interesting course!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.57
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.57
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.89

Kursutvärderingssystem från