|
ENKÄTER
|
|
|
Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPEPO 1213-3 Power system operation, ENM065
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-04-12 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Read this before filling in the questionnaireKeep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 4 | | 22% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 7 | | 38% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 4 | | 22% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 16% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 18 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 5% |
50%» | | 1 | | 5% |
75%» | | 5 | | 27% |
100%» | | 11 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 4.44
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 5% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 5% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 16 | | 88% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.18 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 18 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.18 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 5% |
To some extent» | | 6 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 11 | | 61% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.55
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Small extent» | | 4 | | 22% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 11% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.61 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 16% |
Some extent» | | 8 | | 44% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 27% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 10 | | 58% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 41% |
Genomsnitt: 3.41 9. Comments about teaching and course administration- Due to heavy work load in other courses, reading the course litteratur was never really under consideration. Therefor the slides and handouts provided great help. »
- Gustavo did a very good job with the tutorials»
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 27% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.77 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 5% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 22% |
Very well» | | 13 | | 72% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 12. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 4 | | 22% |
Adequate» | | 14 | | 77% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.77 13. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 38% |
High» | | 9 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72
Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 5% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 23% |
Good» | | 9 | | 52% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 17% |
Genomsnitt: 3.82 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Project, tutorials, guest lectures»
- The ARISTO demonstration»
- Gustavo had great tutorials. »
- Great lecturer and great tutor. »
- The good lectures, guest lectures and tutorials»
- The synchronization and transient stability lab»
- ARISTO lab»
16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More clear handouts with more explanation or good refrense which is relevant to this not additional learning. Because the cources workload are already high.»
- I would be more interested in learning the more complex model of the synchronous machine instead of looking into details of how state estimations are calculated. »
- It was hard to take in the information during the lectures»
- Less powerpoint slides. Upload tutorial answers from last year directly at course start.»
- lecturer»
- State estimation should be covered better»
17. Additional comments- The final exam this year had some major changes compared to last 5-6 years, more difficult and the most enjoying thing about it was how extremely long the exam was. There was no time to focus on getting the best possible answer you could give...so i hope they teacher will be fair when he corrects the exam. »
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|
|
|