ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road Vehicle Aerodynamics 2013, MtF-235

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-12 - 2013-04-12
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Lisa Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

30 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»6 20%
Around 15 hours/week»10 33%
Around 20 hours/week»11 36%
Around 25 hours/week»3 10%
At least 30 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- I had other courses crashing.» (At most 10 hours/week)

2. How many hours per week did you spend on other courses?

30 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»1 3%
At most 15 hours/week»5 16%
At most 20 hours/week»9 30%
At most 25 hours/week»7 23%
At most 30 hours/week»8 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Formula student» (At most 30 hours/week)
- more than 30 hours per week.» (At most 30 hours/week)
- Group work..» (At most 30 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

30 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»3 10%
75%»5 16%
100%»21 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

- I would have like to take part in all, very interesting lectures!!» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

30 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

28 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 3%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»27 96%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

6. How well does the course content cover the learning outcome?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 13%
Large extent»21 72%
Great extent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»5 16%
Large extent»17 56%
Great extent»7 23%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts, contact with supervisors etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 6%
Rather well»15 51%
Very well»12 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»7 24%
Very good»19 65%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- The supervisors were not helpful when it come to problem solving or other question which where not connected to PARAVIEW.» (Rather poor) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

30 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 26%
Very well»22 73%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

11. How was the course workload?

30 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 10%
Adequate»23 76%
High»4 13%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

Summarizing questions

12. What is your general impression of the course?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»4 13%
Good»17 56%
Excellent»7 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- no good information» (Fair)
- I"ve would suggest the course/exam was more focused on simulations» (Adequate)

13. What is your impression of the lectures?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»3 10%
Good»22 73%
Excellent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

14. What is your impression of the guest lectures?

30 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»4 13%
Adequate»8 26%
Good»15 50%
Excellent»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

15. What is your impression of the post processing lecture and task in ParaView?

29 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»2 6%
Adequate»7 24%
Good»14 48%
Excellent»4 13%
Did not attend the session»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- We didn"t get any information on how to post processing, just on how to present the work. Therefore it was hard in the beginning to understand what to do in ParaView.» (Poor)

16. What is your impression of the UTM and cooling airflow lecture?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»4 13%
Good»20 66%
Excellent»4 13%
Did not attend the session»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. What is your impression of the exercises?

27 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»6 22%
Adequate»10 37%
Good»9 33%
Excellent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- It wouldn"t hurt if there was a problem solving session for the calculation part and also for the Velocity profile from NS.» (Fair)
- More time and more advance task would be great.» (Good)

18. How would you rate the project work?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»6 20%
Good»14 46%
Excellent»9 30%
Did not attend the sessions»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.03

- It would have been good if you checked if the wind tunnel works before the lab.» (Adequate)
- It would have been good if the organization had worked the way it was suppose to. The information about the presentation was rather poor also. For example we were told to give an 20 minutes presentation in the assignment sheet and when we arrived the time was changed to 10 minutes suddenly.» (Adequate)

19. What did you think about the project layout?

How would you rate the project layout with pre-study, wind tunnel laboration, report and presentation?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 6%
Good»18 60%
Excellent»10 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

20. What is your impression of the UTM/Matlab task?

30 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»13 43%
Good»12 40%
Excellent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

21. What is your impression of the midterm exam?

30 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»3 10%
Adequate»5 16%
Good»17 56%
Excellent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Good to have and relevant but it was to late in the course and the information around it was poor.» (Adequate)
- Could be taken SW 2 so that the project could be extended » (Good)

22. Project groups

Would you prefer to have predefined project groups or do you prefer to have as we had this year, you sign up for the groups by your own?

30 svarande

Prefer predefined groups»11 36%
Prefer to sign up on a list»19 63%

Genomsnitt: 1.63

23. How would you rate the wind tunnel laboratory work?

30 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 16%
Good»11 36%
Excellent»13 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- The wind tunnel didn"t work.» (Poor)

24. What is your impression of the wind tunnel visit to VCC?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 23%
Excellent»23 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

- It would have been better to put the visit in the begining of the cours study week 1 or 2. In the end the exams is more important» (Good)
- Awesome» (Excellent)
- I really appreciated the visit» (Excellent)
- » (Excellent)

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Wind tunnels experimentations and Volvo wind tunnel visit»
- Yes.»
- Wind tunnel visit, Guest lectures»
- Wind tunnel laboratory.»
- the wind tunnel visit to VCC»
- Wind tunnel visit as well as wind tunnel project in school. »
- UTM task and the project if the administrative part works as well as the equipment. »
- Wind tunnel laboratory work and wind tunnel visit to VCC»
- Project group based on experiments in the wind tunnel, Volvo wind tunnel visit»
- Volvo visit and wind tunnel lab»
- the midterm, defenetely ! maybe even extend it with more questions of fundmental fluid dynamics»
- vcc windtunnel»
- everything»
- The lectures»

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better administration and information. Know the first lecture if it will be a midterm, introduce the matlabtask at first lecture. »
- The presentation at the end was not equally divided in minutes. In the PDF it said the group is given 20+10 minutes and we prepared according to that. However groups 1-4 were asked to rush through their presentations which came as a surprise to me as I couldn"t explain whatever I wanted to ! It was even worse when the later groups 6-9 took as much time as they wanted to as it was available to them ! Please divide the time equally among presentations. »
- More guest lectures from industry»
- Maybe make the UTM Matlab task more clear.»
- MATLAB task»
- Work load could be higher»
- I think all the parts should be preserved but the administration around it should definitely be better.»
- Exercises»
- Define at the beginning if there is a mid-term exam or not , however, it was nice to have this exam in order to work regularly»
- There is so much interesting aerodynamic work done in the industry, so obviously there are many people working with these stuffs (chassis design development, windtunnel testings etc.) so why not invite anyone of them ? the volvo trucks guest lecture was a disaster, had nothing to do with aerodynamics. »
- more content on race dynamics»
- -»
- I would like to have more of an introduction to CFD-simulations»

27. Additional comments

- Very interesting course, too bad the advanced course was cancelled.»
- -»

Kursutvärderingssystem från