ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPAEM, MMK221 HT12, MMK221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-02-04 - 2013-02-10
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 57%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 25 hours/week»1 7%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 28%
75%»5 35%
100%»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- around 85%» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 7%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- The lectures where often just reading aloud from the slides, which made it more giving to sit at home and read the slides instead of showing up at lectures.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Couldn"t have passed the exam without it :D» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»8 57%
Very well»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- too many files, in a too messy order» (Rather badly)
- Could be good to have specific booked supervisions so you don"t have to wait while the other groups are supervised. » (Rather well)
- However, usage of pingpong would be nicer, so all courses are gathered the same place» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 42%
Very good»6 42%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- delay concerning questions in mails» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»10 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- tooooo huge groups with tooo lazy participants!!» (Rather poorly)
- The groups should be given instead of us wasting 2 weeks trying to form groups with enough people and similar interest.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»11 78%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Maybe a bigger project would have given better understanding and deeper knowledge. Some lectures were to basic to be part of an advanced course.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»11 78%
High»2 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- The other lecture was too time consuming» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
Good»7 50%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was too basic for being an advanced course. More practical examples and workshops/labs were we could use CES would have been nice as a compliment to the lectures.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Having some kind of project.»
- Projects»
- all»
- the content of the course the way of organization»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lectureformat»
- More in-depth knowledge. More focus on the projects.»
- nothing»
- The schedule of the course should be changed, that is, to have more courses in the morning rather than in the afternoon.»

16. Additional comments

- NA»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.42
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.42
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6

Kursutvärderingssystem från