|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course Eval. Software Architecture, DIT541Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-01-27 - 2013-02-07 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31% Kontaktperson: Björn Olsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: GU Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: GU
1. What is your overall impression of this course?1-5Compared to other courses in your program. 5 beeing the highest grade. 22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - I think it was rather boring. Perhaps, not enough "energy" within the course itself.» (3) 2. Did the teacher have the skills needed to teach this course?1-55 beeing the highest grade 22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.22 - awesome! Asked for our inputs and had a good discussion with us who where in class» (5) 3. What is your opinion on the course litterature?1-55 beeing the highest grade 22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - It was really bad, course book didn"t really say anything about architecture...» (1) 4. What is your opinion on the mini-problems?1-55 beeing the highest grade 22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.31 - They were helpful. I would have liked to have seen good examples of each assignment afterwards, maybe. Or something showing "this is how a professional architect with years of experience might do one."» (4) 5. What is your opinion on the exam?1-55 beeing the highest grade 22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.27 - It was good, but took longer than expected. Even working much of the day, I had to rush it out in the end and wasn"t particularly happy with the quality of the last question(s).» (3) 6. What was good about the course?- The way the course responsible conducted the lectures was amazing»- Good was that we got to meet you, so maybe , in the future, we will benefit from this.» - 40 but i didnt accepted » - one if the best teachers ever! he really listened to what we wanted to learn and had really good inputs on how to write good architecture!» - THe topic itself and discussions with the teacher and classmates.» - The good thing about the course were the lectures.I found them really helpful.» - interesting subject» - Software architecture is important» - Teacher is really good at teaching, more is that he really focused on the interaction with students, and he cares about how to improve the course based on the students feedback.» - Learning how to structure a system» 7. What can be improved in the course?- Get better course literature. The Kenzman book is somehow confusing»- Maybe the presentation of the information. You know the theory, but maybe, I think there is a better way to give it to us.» - more lecture time! I like lectures so :)» - Better book. I like learning by studying examples of masters (or at least knowledge people) the way art students study the works of masters. I would like to see high quality architectural documents. Not big-ass telephone-book-thick ones, but digestible ones, suitable for a students first exposure.» - perhaps a better literature» - Start at the right time not half way through the project» - more real life examples» - All the improvement should be done are already covered during the lecture.» - More discussion about the real cases» 8. Anything else you wish to communicate?- No»- nope» - Thanks!» - more guest lecture form real time architects who are currently working in the filed would be great even those who recruit » - no.» - Thank you so much for teaching us.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%