Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Materials Characterization and Failure Analysis 2012/13 MMK082, MMK082

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-25 - 2013-02-10
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Mats Norell»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own work

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time in, including both lectures, project and your own studies. Try to estimate the average for the whole study period.

22 svarande

At most 10 hours»1 4%
About 15 hours»7 31%
About 20 hours»11 50%
About 25 hours»2 9%
About 30 hours»1 4%
At least 35 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

2. How large percentage of the lectures did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 4%
75%»8 36%
100%»13 59%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

Learning outcome

The course syllabus states the the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e. the knowledge, proficiencies and I attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable and reasonable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

5. Did the examination assess wheather you have reached the course goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»2 9%
To some extent»7 33%
Yes, definitely»12 57%
I do not know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- The exam was mainly on surface analysis and that should be just a small part of the course.» (No, not at all)
- Too much focus on surface analysis during the examination, a part that for most groups just was in theory. » (To some extent)
- In combination with the project, yes» (Yes, definitely)
- examination was formulated in an excellent way.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Minor extent»1 4%
Some extent»7 31%
Significant extent»10 45%
Great extent»4 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- The lectures were a bit long so it was hard to follow and listen for four hour straight. But they gave a good understanding what the exame was about» (Some extent)

7. How did you find the lectures?

22 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»0 0%
Average»10 45%
Good»10 45%
Very Good»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Some were interesting and engaging. Some had content that seemed unnecessary. » (Average)
- They are pretty good but it gets very heavy when you got 4 hours straight of lectures.» (Average)
- Most lectures were good, some great, some clearly worse, depending on lecturer. Massive powerpoint lectures can be hard to take in.» (Average)
- Some guest lectures were not as good as Mats» (Good)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and lecture notes been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Minor extent»2 9%
Some extent»10 45%
Significant extent»7 31%
Great extent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Cf previous question. Powerpoint slides make poor study material. More references to existing litterature would be nice even if understandably no single title covers the whole course.» (Some extent)

9. How would you rate the lab tour?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»12 54%
Excellent»8 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- It"s good for once that we were able to use our knowledge practically and not only theoretically » (Excellent)

10. How would you rate the study visit at Volvo?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 15%
Good»6 30%
Excellent»11 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- Couldn"t go on that tour» (?)
- Unfortunately i could not participate in the study visit.» (?)
- it was very informative and could see how the course was related to the industrial framework.» (Excellent)
- For the project groups concerned, our visit SKF was equally excellent. » (Excellent)

11. What is your general impression of the project?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 9%
Good»15 68%
Excellent»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

- Started a bit late (but I see that this is hard to organize at all)» (Good)

12. Would you like the project to be graded?

21 svarande

Yes, grade the course only based on the project»2 11%
Yes, grade the course based on the project and the exam»10 58%
No»5 29%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.17

- Not sure. If it was graded, the overall course grade should definitely also take the exam into account. » (?)
- Since the project is a lot of work it also should account in the grade.» (Yes, grade the course based on the project and the exam)
- The projects are so different i think a more general exam is needed» (No)
- Could be hard to grade on something that abstract like a project for individual students. But it could v good. » (No opinion)

13. How would you rate the support you got during the project?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»10 45%
Excellent»8 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

14. Do you have any suggstions for methods or types of projects to be included in, or excluded from, the course?

- It would be nice to have one more project which is polymer related»
- No»
- may be the projects could be introduced during the first week itself. that way, it gives enough time to do the background study on the product and its function.»
- nothing»

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 22%
Very Good»17 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»11 50%
Very well»11 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- We had problems with one of our group members» (Rather well)

17. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»17 77%
High»4 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- Low during the lectures, very high when the project started.» (High)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 9%
Good»15 68%
Excellent»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

- Is is good to have projects related to real companies» (Excellent)
- One of the beat courses I have taken » (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The projects»
- The projects»
- The main concept of the course»
- visit to volvo»
- Study visit»
- yes»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The project should count somehow to the final grade since it is the most part of the course.»
- A small handout of all the lectures (test methods) so you could come more prepared to the lectures. »
- The booking system of the lab sessions»
- introducing the project earlier might help.»
- no change needed»
- Start projects earlier. Projects courses like this would benefit from running through an entire semester. »

21. Are there overlaps with other courses and, if so, please point these out and evaluate whether or not the overlaps were negative.

- not with those i have taken up»
- no»
- Mechanical Performance of Engineering materials, it was only beneficial.»

22. Additional comments


Kursutvärderingssystem från