Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ARK261 Healthcare Architecture HT 12

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-22 - 2013-02-07
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 77%
Kontaktperson: Peter Fröst»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Knowledge, strategies, and methodologies to formulate visions for healthcare architecture, as well as practical skills to design and integrate an actual healthcare building.

14 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»5 35%
Excellent»8 57%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.42

2. Understand healthcare architecture as part of cultural and societal change as well as urban development

14 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»5 38%
Excellent»7 53%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Excellent to work with the needs of today but also with the issues of tomorrow. This reality showed us that it was not only a matter of "picturalable" architecture, and it gives us a truly nice kick, architecture students of the digital generation.» (Excellent)

3. Be able to work interactively with complex programming, combining aspects of spaces for care, patient experience, work environment, logistics and architectural systems thinking.

14 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»6 42%
Excellent»7 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- would have liked a proper workshop with the staff» (Sufficient)
- As this sentence demonstrated, there were a trumendous number of subjects which we had to deal with, and it was a real (too?) big challenge according to the allocated time.» (Sufficient)

4. General insights about and practical skills in “,Future proofing”, and planning for continuous change –, generality, flexibility and adaptability

14 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»1 7%
Sufficient»10 71%
Excellent»2 14%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.92

5. Understand, and be able to apply the concepts of Healing Architecture and Evidence Based Design.

14 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»1 7%
Sufficient»8 57%
Excellent»4 28%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.07

6. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

14 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

- They are reasonable for sure, but these two months were not sufficient: starting from more or less nothing to reach our results did not let the time to really assimilate, experiment and come up with new visions. Therefore, it is obvious that it"s up to us to go further by ourselves.» (Yes, the goals are reasonable)

7. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

14 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»10 71%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»4 28%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The goals for the studio are very reasonable, for the idea of the project to be completed by two groups of two or three people» (Reasonable scope in relation to credits)

Education and course administration

8. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

14 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»2 14%
Rather big»9 64%
Very big»3 21%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- Mycket information vi hade till seminariet var ganska självklara fakta. Bra info, men inte upseeendeväckande. » (Rather little)

9. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

14 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»7 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Sometimes difficult that information only is posted on Studieportalen. Easier to keep updated if emailed as well. » (Rather well)
- Ibland lite svårt att prata med Peter direkt i bärjan av kursen, då blev det mest mail. » (Rather well)
- Absolutely excellent, it is a pleasure to know how the whole period is scheduled from the beginning, it allows us to build a timeline for our design process very early. » (Very well)

Work environment

10. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

14 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»13 92%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- lite mer frånvarande handledare i början, sen blev det bättre och vi såg dem ofta.» (Very well)
- Bra med olika handledare med olika expertis i ett sånt här projekt» (Very well)

11. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

14 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 35%
Very good»9 64%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Too little cooperation between groups, even though it was encouraged. » (Rather good)
- the person I have cooperated with as a group partner and I ended having very oposite vision of what the project should be about. It was because of sickness problem on her side as well as the oposite understandings of why should be meeting the deadlines. It has been harder for me to focuse on the quolity of the part of submited pieces since I had to make sure I have produced everything we needed at the end» (Rather good)
- I think the study environment was a bit hostile and competitive in the beginning, but it got better after a while. Hopefully it will be more friendly and "open-source" next year...» (Rather good)
- Coming from abroad, it needs time to figure out the swedish way of working (especially because the difference is rather big compared to France). But it was very good, even though we made one or two mistakes in our time management.» (Very good)

Concluding questions

12. What is your overall opinion of the course?

14 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»0 0%
Good»2 14%
Very good»12 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

- Många av hållbarhetsaspekterna hamnade i skymundan, troligtvis pga tidsbrist. Vi partade om hållbarhet, i alla tre aspekter, men ingen jobbade med det hela vägen ut i designen, det blir då lätt post-it ekologi, något som läggs till i slutet. Om det ska vara med i designen måste det finnas med från start, och alla kompromissade bort det för att jobba med koncept. samtidigt har vi inte möjligheten att kompromissa med detta. i de flesta kurser väljer både studemter och handledare koncept framför hållbarhet, och det slutar med att vi egentligen inte alls har jobbat med dessa frågor, och vi som är tänkte att jobba för en hållbar framtid kan lika lite om detta som tidigare generationer. om det finns med i föreläsningarna, måste det även finnas med i designdelen.» (Very good)

13. What should be preserved next year?

- The complexity of the task. The amount of tutoring. »
- study trips, literature, literature seminar, workshops»
- the study trip and visits to different hospitals in the beginning of the course gave a lot of input»
- The complex program, all tutors, study visits and the direct contact to a "real" client. »
- > Teachers availability and their great ability to listen and push us up until the end. > Also the background materials, the diversified literature and the numerous and interesting study visits were the keypoints to make this studio a real stimulating high-quality studio!»

14. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- The workshops could benefit of being all at the sme week and not divided.»
- Litterature seminar earlier in the course (if needed). »
- the posibility to have mixed workgroupshops, the possibility to not submit a preliminary report before, or that to be personal decision to submit one»
- the literature seminar could be more clear»
- Some of the lectures in the early part of the course was not that good. Keep the evidence based design though.»
- > In a general way, I would say the workshops are unfortunately too detached from our personal evolution in the design process. They are important during the research step and they should be more integrated afterwards when we already have had time to figure out a bit what a healthcare space really is and aims to be. So perhaps they should be later in the schedule, as well as the mid-critics. > Indeed, if November was allocated to understand the issues of the healthcare architecture, December was for the "response production". And it finally gives me the impression to do not have investigated so much all the knowledge we have got. > And the whole allocated time, as I already said, but time is always something we have to deal with, so do not take it personally ,) »

15. Other comments

- Thank you very much for making this studio so confusing (in a good way, that"s what I like), inspiring, and interesting. And at last thanks for integrating so well the young foreigners, this studio would deserve more success with exchange students.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från