ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

BOM-Infrastructural geo engineering 2012, BMT040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-18 - 2013-02-04
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 13%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

5 svarande

0-20%»1 20%
20-40%»1 20%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»2 40%
80-100%»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- I had to quit this course halfway through as it was in the same block as an obligatory course from year one that I had missed. I would have liked to finish this course instead of the other but couldn"t. » (0-20%)
- Bra att man fick lika mycket geo-/bergkunskaper.» (60-80%)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Tidspress gjorde att det blev en halvhjärtad redovisning.» (To some extent)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

4 svarande

Very poor»1 25%
Rather poor»2 50%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»1 25%
Rather badly»1 25%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Material kom upp sent på pingpong och inlämning av uppgifter var krånglig. Eftersom tiden var knapp mellan inlämningar och kritik så vore det bättre om allt kunde skötas automatiskt genom pingpong.» (Rather badly)
- handouts came late» (Rather well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Alltid lika svårt att få tag på en dator i datorsalarna på V.» (Some extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

5 svarande

less than 20%»1 20%
20-40%»1 20%
about 50%»1 20%
60-80%»2 40%
more than 80%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- See comment above.» (less than 20%)
- Hade kunnat lägga mer för att prestera bättre resultat men har inte haft den tiden denna period.» (about 50%)

10. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»2 50%
Too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- but very good» (High)
- Känns okej, på gränsen till för mycket.» (High)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»1 20%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Interesting course.» (Good)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

5 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»1 20%
Neutral»0 0%
Rahter high»3 60%
Very high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- weakly assignments»
- the amount of work and weekly assignments»
- Veckouppgifterna.»
- One positive thing-there was some lectures that in a very good way involved the students attention. After showing some lecture slides some questions aboute these slides were asked where the anserws was A,B,C. It was a form of quiz.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more feedback on the assignments from teachers»
- feedback to the students»
- Inlämning och hämtning av veckouppgifterna via PingPong.»
- In general-organisation of the course was very poor. Teachers should be more available for questions and as they are working at the other companies it is difficult to contact them fast to ask question. And it was very necessary to ask questions as almost all tasks needed some further explanations. Course page on the ping pong should be more often updated and all power point should be uploaded directly after lecture or even before.Task should be explained by the teachers before handing it out and question in those tasks should be formulated in more understable way. It took too much time just to find out what was required in those tasks. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från