|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
BOM-Urban metabolism 2012, BOM165Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-01-18 - 2013-02-04 Antal svar: 12 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25% Kontaktperson: Björn Engström» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Learning outcomes and examinationBefore you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Not too high, rather undefined goals» (No, the goals are set too high) 2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - How to perform an EIA in reality.» (60-80%) 3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - I felt that the examination did not show how much work and effort I put into the tasks. » (To some extent) Teaching and learning4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.45 - I enjoyed the workshop by the architect! I think the greatest value of this course generally was the broad perspective and the influence from different academic spheres. » (?) 5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.41 - The book is too detailed on EIAs" theory in the UK.» (Small extent) 6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - The language skills was an issue.» (Rather poor) Course organisation7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.91 - It would have Been nice to have a schedule a few weeks before the course started where all compulsory things were noted. Getting and email the day before a lecture saying it could "improve your grade" was a little late. » (Rather badly) Study climate8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - We managed to book a room through a group member which was really helpful but not really due to the course. The lecture halls were often too small.» (Small extent) 9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 10. How was the course workload?12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - I think the large time spent on the excel exercise could have been spent much better, but I liked the essay writing and the project work.» (High) Summarising questions11. What is your general impression of the course?12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Too much theory on a practical subject.» (Fair) 12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Could be better and thereby adding more value to the master programme.» (Neutral) 13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Literature seminars (although other literature) and small scale project works - though more practical EIA.»- Ass 1 and Ass 4» - GIS, and more focus on it» - The project. I was fortunate to have a really good project group and was happy with the outcome. It was nice to work creatively in an engineering course. The essays were also interesting to write.» - The urban farming lecture/work shop, was really interesting and fun-more like that. As well as the lecture from the teacher from Switcerland.» - The excel model that Leonardo have done.» 14. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Administration and language knowledge of teachers. More focus on Swedish EIAs.»- ass 2 and ass 3» - material gathering, no use in the understanding of urban metabolism » - The excel exercise: if you want us to learn the ideas of making a MFA, there are better ways to explore it than copying someone else"s work. Generally the focus on data, the point that it is important was really hammered home, it would have been nice to focus more on implications of urban metabolism, and the sustainability aspects of it.» - The 5% assignments where horrible. I spend probably 15 hours alltogether to do it, and get it right (it crashed few times and to find the error took forewer) and it was only 5% and then most of my friends they just handed in the same copy and got the same grade as I, despite only one boy did the whole assignement. Bit frustarating and pointless. » - A More specific description of how to approach the writing assignments.» - More material to start with during the big group work»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9%