Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

BOM-Heat and moisture engineering 2012, BOM145

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-18 - 2013-02-04
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 76%
No, the goals are set too high»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

21 svarande

0-20%»2 9%
20-40%»1 4%
40-60%»4 19%
60-80%»13 61%
80-100%»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

21 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»11 52%
Yes, definitely»9 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- The project presentations were moot. Every one was the same» (To some extent)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»5 25%
Some extent»8 40%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Only went to the first lecture» (Small extent)
- The lectures are to long and not as interesting as when solving problems» (Some extent)
- very uninspiring lectures and labs, the whole course needs to be looked over. » (Some extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»4 19%
Large extent»11 52%
Great extent»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- but very poorly with literature» (Some extent)
- It would be nice if the ducument required for the exam be printed by the teachers and hand in in class.» (Large extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

21 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 14%
Rather good»13 61%
Very good»5 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 20%
Rather well»14 70%
Very well»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Nice that the pp-slides are on The homepage before the lecture itself» (Rather well)
- Angela handed out papers in class, very nice» (Very well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 28%
Large extent»11 52%
Great extent»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Too few computers and specially too few group rooms» (Some extent)
- More computers needed!» (Some extent)
- there is problem to find a free computer or sudy room» (Some extent)
- hard to get hold of computers» (Some extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

21 svarande

less than 20%»2 9%
20-40%»9 42%
about 50%»7 33%
60-80%»3 14%
more than 80%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- Here in lies the problem! I spent (as most others) every day and weekend for the FEM basics, the only time i had to give in this course were the lectures, nothing else. So fix FEM, and this course shall flourish» (less than 20%)
- The other cours was very "heavy" and we prioritized that one » (20-40%)
- FEM takes alot longer, even though there where some joined projects.» (20-40%)
- But both courses were very heavy, on the whole period I only had one day when I did not go study for more than eight houres (that was a Sunday when I was sick)» (about 50%)

10. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 9%
Adequate»12 57%
High»4 19%
Too high»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Efficient assignment to better understand the course» (Adequate)
- Many small projects. But it should be expected in a MSc» (High)
- we dont have enough time for so many information» (Too high)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»4 19%
Fair»2 9%
Adequate»9 42%
Good»6 28%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The lectures must be developed» (Adequate)
- There was so much to do in the fem-course so there was not time enough to learn this course as good as I wanted.» (Adequate)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

21 svarande

Very small»1 4%
Rather small»1 4%
Neutral»8 38%
Rahter high»10 47%
Very high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Going the focused trail on structural engineering, so no interest» (Very small)
- Toknow about heat and moisture problems are very good, but the way it is thought in the course don"t give you the knowledge and the wish to learn more.» (Neutral)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project.»
- Björn Engström»
- teachers»
- project work»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Feedback of project needs to be more practical and in time. »
- The lectures haven"t been very good. Sometimes it felt like the teachers were not reallt sure about what they were talking about. ( Except from Tang, he knows his business!)»
- Course liteature It has been better if there is a organised book »
- better structure and organisation. Better lectures with more examples. Felt like the exam and the course did not have the same focus.»
- students should have more practical works during the labs.»
- More exam example solving during lectures »

Kursutvärderingssystem från