Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Electroacoustics and Ultrasonics Q2 2012, VTA141

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-17 - 2013-02-17
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Lars Hansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 42%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»1 14%
75%»4 57%
100%»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course. It can be found here: https://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=15653

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- The goals and cours description are old from when Mendel held the course. Needs updating, especially since Per has changed the course.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 28%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The exercises were terrible. But the lectures were great.» (Some extent)
- Good lectures, but needs some clarification of why we want to investigate different steps on the way and where we are going with that. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent was the laboratory work of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2

- We had the lab too late and it was to small. It only confirmed the theoretical calculations wa have done before. Larger lab or maybe two labs.» (Small extent)
- It was no help whatsoever.» (Small extent)
- I know you are still working on this.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 57%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Good PDFs, Per!» (Large extent)
- Taught me everything.» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 28%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Many dates had to be changed (lectures postponed, exercise in a differen room,..), but the communication about this could have been better. It was NO problem that the lecture-PDFs came out after the lectures.» (Rather badly)
- Alot of changes by Lars in the beginning, especially like 20 minutes before lectures.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Per and Lars always had time to answer questions.» (Very good)
- No problems.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- There was hardly cooperation. But if, it worked.» (Rather well)

12. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»2 28%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I would have liked to learn more.» (Too low)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»4 57%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The exercises with Lars was simply not good. He did not know the subject itself, nor did he come as prepared as he should. If you asked for intermediate steps in calculations, he could not answer. He also had a somewhat arrogant attitude towards questions and us in general. I quickly stopped going to the exercises, as did most of us, so he might have gotten better towards the end. » (Fair)
- The lectures were much better than the exercises.» (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The wide range of topics (mics, loudspeakers, digital audio, room acoustics, ...)»
- Everything»
- Keep the electroacoustic part about mics and loudspeakers.»
- Per! The lecture notes!»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Access to anechoic chamber for lab. Introduce hand-in tasks like TA1»
- I was not satisfied with the exercise: Lars wrote the solutions of the problems on the blackboard, but he could NOT explain what he was doing. He always sticked to formulas and "given facts", but apparently he did not understand these. You should work on this! Better communication to the students (about lab, general organisation,...).»
- Maybe work on the lab material to reinforce its reliability...»
- Remove the room acoustic and digital audio part or keep them. But more about vented boxes has to be inbluded. I"m a bit disapointed that we barely touched the subject. We barely spoke about the shift in impedance and phase over frequency and how that influence the performance. Maybe a lab about that. I think that is more important than talking about sensitivity. So a lot more pure electroacoustics can be included before even thinking about room acoustics or digital audio. Or the name has to be changed.»
- Exercises. The lab-work to be more practical.»

17. Additional comments

- I would have appreciated more lectures to cover all the topics and to have the time to go more into detail. Have you thought about including the "ticking" into the exercises?»

Kursutvärderingssystem från