Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TEK285 12/13, TEK285
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-01-15 - 2013-01-31 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28% Kontaktperson: Andreas Hagen» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
1. How many percent of the lectures did you attend?13 svarande
<25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25-50%» | | 2 | | 15% |
50-75%» | | 3 | | 23% |
>75%» | | 8 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?*13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Neutral» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather well» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - The administration was okay but the schedule changed too many times. Why two hours lectures in the morning?» (Rather badly)
- I"ve had no trouble getting the information that I"ve needed when I needed it. Been a none issue really, which I guess is a very good grade as when this works it should hardly be noticed.» (Rather well)
3. How demanding was the course?*13 svarande
Not at all demanding» | | 0 | | 0% |
Slightly demanding» | | 2 | | 15% |
Average/neutral» | | 5 | | 38% |
Demanding» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very demanding» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 - I"ve Always been interested in logistics in different forms. The main challenge for me was putting actual names to theories I"ve already touched upon earlier. My gymnasium also helped as they"ve focused quite abit upon industrial logistics. As that was the case it was more about remembering and figuring out stuff than pumping in new knowledge. I guess that may mean that I"ve actually gained more understanding than I would otherwise would have.» (Average/neutral)
4. Did you buy the course book?*13 svarande
Yes» | | 12 | | 92% |
No, too expensive» | | 1 | | 7% |
No, other reason» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.07 - It is difficult to find the book in an other way that buying the book. It could be interesting to implement or give relations to previous students of the course (if same book) for reducing the price and offering more opportunities.» (Yes)
5. How much of the recommended chapters in the book have you read?13 svarande
0-25%» | | 2 | | 15% |
25-50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50-75%» | | 6 | | 46% |
75-100%» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - Used it as a dictionary, too much otiose info» (0-25%)
6. How would you rate the book?13 svarande
Poorly written» | | 1 | | 7% |
OK» | | 8 | | 61% |
Well written» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 2.23 - Very bad english!» (Poorly written)
7. How useful were the lecture notes? (slide handouts)*13 svarande
Did not use them» | | 0 | | 0% |
Useless» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat useful» | | 4 | | 30% |
Good to have them» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very useful» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 8. On average, how would you rate the amount of material covered in one lecture?*13 svarande
Boringly little» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK but more could be added» | | 2 | | 15% |
Just about right on average» | | 7 | | 53% |
OK but some could be removed» | | 3 | | 23% |
Way too much to absorb per lecture» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - I wouldn"t have minded a higher pace. I do like that almost all issues came with real Life examples, it definately helps me to understand when you have an application of the theory. However, some issues may have been "too" easy and self evident.» (OK but more could be added)
9. How would you rate the lectures on average?*13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 5 | | 38% |
Good» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 - Quite monotone, could have been mixed up with discussions or whatever!» (Neutral)
- Most of them where good, but some where more useful than others» (Good)
10. How would you rate the Beer Game Workshop exercise?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 7% |
Neutral» | | 1 | | 7% |
Good» | | 6 | | 46% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 - This was a good way to get to learn the subject in a different way than just by using the books.» (Good)
- The only thought I"ve got is that it would be interesting if you could somehow screen of each part from eachother. Even though you"re not talking to the other pars of the chain, it"s quite easy to glance on the others to assess the situation.» (Very good)
- Fun to do something different apart from the lecures» (Very good)
11. How would you rate the group project assignment?*13 svarande
Very bad» | | 1 | | 7% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - No specific directions, i would rather see all groups aiming for similar requirements» (Very bad)
- The presentation was badly administrated» (Good)
- Worked like a charm.» (Very good)
12. How would you rate the consultation/supervision for your group project assignment?*Do you feel you got enough opportunities to get tutoring, ask questions etc?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 3 | | 23% |
Good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - We got the help we needed to finish. Mostly to get on track in the beginning than help during the actual Project.» (Good)
13. In general, how do feel about the availability of teachers?*Do you feel that you could freely ask questions, get help et cetera13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - The availability was good and they where easy to reach when needed.» (Good)
- No issues here» (Very good)
14. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?*13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 3 | | 23% |
Good» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 15. What is your general impression of the course?*13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 7% |
Neutral» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 - I"m afraid it may get less regard than it may be worth. Many of the issues that we learned during the course are very self-evident once you know the basic structure of logistics. As such it"s easy to feel that you already know all the stuff when you"re finished with the course, while you actually didn"t have as sound a grasp of it all at the beginning.» (Good)
16. How would you rate Gunnar Stefanssons efforts in the course?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - The subject seems interesting but it was hard to stay focused! Please, breake off with some other activity!!!» (Neutral)
- Many repetitions of information» (Neutral)
- Could have had a faster pace, however the content of the lectures and the examples were all good.» (Good)
17. How would you rate Kenth Lumsdens (guest lecturer) efforts in the course?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 4 | | 30% |
Good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 15% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - Don"t Think I attended this lecture» (Neutral)
- Why separate in two lectures?» (Neutral)
18. How would you rate Andreas Hagens efforts in the course?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 19. How would you rate Roger Lindaus (guest lecturer) efforts in the course?13 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 2 | | 15% |
Good» | | 8 | | 61% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - Very nice to get to hear about information form real work. Theory is nice and all, but sometimes it feels it may be abit naive to reality. It"s nice to conferm, or not, with someone who is currently working with it.» (Good)
20. Other comments/suggestions for how the course can be improved?- As I said, the organisation of the course on the webpage is really well done. Thus, it could be interesting to introduce a forum to developp discussions with current and previous students of the course especially for buying an already used book or sharing a book between different people.»
- Slightly higher pace, I understand it may be difficult to balance. But at times, I"m afraid, the lecture were abit boring which I think was mainly due me feeling that I knew what spoken about and no new info came in a long time.
This is of course my personal view, I don"t know if that is the prevailing view.
Thanks for an interesting course»
- I would like to add a comment on the presentation day:
There were a lot of presentation to listen to, and I noticed that the attention from all students to the presentations of other students was rather poor. I think I have an idea how to make this better next year.
First of all it woul be an idea to add a second break within the presentations, to break oup the listening times a little bit.
Secondly I would forbid to work on the presentations during the presentation day, ban laptops out of the room. A lot of people were doing stuff on their laptops, in stead of listening to the presentations.
By doing this I think the attention is a lot higher during presentations, which is more interesting for the listeners, and for the presenters!»
- Some lectures were perceived as rather slow because the topic discussed might sometimes seem to obvious or unnecessary to explain or develop further.»
* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|