ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ship Resistance and Computational Hydrodynamics, MMA161

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-09 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Rickard Bensow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 20 hours/week» 5 45%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 27%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 9%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- unevenly distributed, a lot more the last couple of weeks» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 2 18%

75%» 4 36%

100%» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 9%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 18%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 4 36%

Yes, definitely» 6 54%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- almost to easy, especially duggan» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 6 54%

Large extent» 4 36%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- This subject back be a little boring to listen to for 2-4 hours some mornings. I dont know but some more excitement during the lectures, maybe show some real cases?» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the computer assignments been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 4 36%

Some extent» 3 27%

Large extent» 4 36%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Good assignments but A LOT of problems with the computers» (Small extent)
- It was difficult to follow the instructions and the assistants were at some points giving different explanations/instructions.» (Small extent)
- The computer assignments were somewhat confusing» (Some extent)
- when the program was working» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the design task been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 0 0%

Large extent» 4 36%

Great extent» 7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- We did learn a lot. Good design task.» (Large extent)
- Shipflow was not the best program in combination with the crappy computers..» (Large extent)
- The biggest problem was the lack of proper computational power, the computers are too old/bad to be used when running shipflow.» (Great extent)

9. Were there enough lectures?

11 svarande

Less lectures» 1 9%

Sufficient» 8 72%

Some more» 2 18%

Much more» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- Felt like the lectures only was good if you aimed for grade 4 or 5.» (Sufficient)

10. Please rate the teaching qualities of Rickard and give constructive criticism.

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Acceptable» 0 0%

Good» 4 36%

Very good» 7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Good lecturing.» (Very good)
- structured!» (Very good)
- he is very pedagogical and speaks at a level which students can easily understand him» (Very good)

11. Please rate the teaching qualities of Arash and give constructive criticism.

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Acceptable» 1 9%

Good» 6 54%

Very good» 4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- He is very helpful and ambitious. He spend lots of his own time beside the scheduled time in order to help students» (Very good)

12. Please rate the teaching qualities of Farzad and give constructive criticism.

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Acceptable» 0 0%

Good» 7 63%

Very good» 4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- He had very good theoretical explanations during the computer classes» (Very good)

13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 2 18%

Some extent» 3 27%

Large extent» 3 27%

Great extent» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- Did not buy the book, since there was an electonic one available. I guess it would a good book to buy it if you intend to continue with resistance/hydrodynamics after chalmers.» (Small extent)
- Good information.» (Some extent)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 9%

Rather well» 5 45%

Very well» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Nothing to complain about.» (Very well)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 1 9%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 3 27%

Very good» 7 63%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- The hours in Ritsalen was critical. Everyone needed help from Arash and Farzad during 2 hours. The computers didn"t respond so we couldn"t show what our problem was. Very ineffective time.» (Very poor)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 9%

Rather well» 1 9%

Very well» 9 81%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

17. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 8 72%

High» 3 27%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Good. But I think it was very low in the beginning and very high in the end of the course.» (Adequate)
- unevenly distributed. the project in the end is very timeconsuming!» (Adequate)
- Over the entire period it was not very high, however the project were very compact. While working with the project we did not have much time to spend on studying for the exam or to work on other courses.» (High)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 5 45%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- level: Master» (Adequate)
- The other course, the structural course is very hard and time consuming. In the end it was a disaster when we struggled with the project and the studying for the strucutal exam at the same time.» (Too high)
- If the project were given over a greater timespan and the third assignment in marine structural engineering moved to an earlier point it would probably help. Apart from that detail the workload was not too high. » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 9 81%

Excellent» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good that the project could give a grade.» (Good)
- It gives a good ide of what to come if someone chooses to continue with this type of work.» (Good)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project. However, it could be encurriged to start with it earlier.»
- the structured lectures and the project in the end»
- I think this course should be kept as it was this year exept may be more computer hours in order to avoid the stress to complete the assignment in time!»
- The design project was excellent»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better computers. More time with help in Ritsalen.»
- The first assignments need to be done in the fisrt three weeks, so that there is more time for the project.»
- try to even out the workload and better computers are needed for the simulations!! a lot of time is spent on crashing simulations!»
- More guidelines and instructions for the design task. It was never clear exactly what had to be done. Farzad said one thing, Arash another»
- The arrangement of the computer assignments. They were confusing and lacking explanations.»

22. Additional comments

- Lectures involved lots of theory. Try to explain how this theory can help us with the project more. Relate more to the project during the lectures. However, very good course!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.18

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.18
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från