ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Platform Development and Modularization Management 2012, TEK020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-08 - 2013-01-28
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson (Teknikens ekon»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»7 50%
Around 25 hours/week»2 14%
Around 30 hours/week»3 21%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 35%
100%»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.64

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 21%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 57%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The seminars were much more informative and educational in comparision with the lectures. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»10 71%
Great extent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- I prefere to have articles that highligts interesting aspects within the theoretical field rather than having a more general textbook that only gives an overview of many aspects without going into depth in any. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 50%
Very good»6 42%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 14%
Rather well»2 14%
Very well»10 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»11 78%
High»2 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 46%
High»4 30%
Too high»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

Summarizing questions

13. What do you think about Magnus Persson"s lectures

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»4 28%
Good»7 50%
Very good»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

14. What do you think about Fredrik von Corswant"s (Volvo Trucks) guest lecture

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 14%
Good»5 35%
Very good»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

15. What do you think about Kent Severinsson"s (Tetra Pak) guest lecture

14 svarande

Very good»1 7%
Good»6 42%
OK»4 28%
Poor»0 0%
Very poor»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

16. Compared with this year"s course, I would prefer to have:

Matrisfråga

- Seemed unnecessary with three seminars, it felt as there was not enough material and the discussions were pretty much the same in the two last seminars. Two seminars would have been sufficient.»

Lectures
14 svarande

Much more»1 7%
More»2 14%
Same»11 78%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Guest lectures
14 svarande

Much more»3 21%
More»4 28%
Same»7 50%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

Literature seminars
14 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»1 7%
Same»8 57%
Less»4 28%
Much less»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Group work
14 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»1 7%
Same»10 71%
Less»2 14%
Much less»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

17. I think that the weights given to the different parts in the course assessment should:

Matrisfråga

- I believe that the course had a satisfactorial balance between the different parts were focus were on using the obtained knowledge through the topic report and the seminars rather than simply repeating it. »
- I think maybe that atleast 60% of all the points should be individual so that you can get a 5 even though your group report is not a 5.»

Topic reports (currently 45 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»3 21%
Stay the same»5 35%
Decrease»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

Presentation of topic report (currently 5 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»0 0%
Stay the same»14 100%
Decrease»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Literature seminars (currently 30 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»5 35%
Stay the same»6 42%
Decrease»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

Individual reflection on the guest lectures (currently 10 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»2 14%
Stay the same»12 85%
Decrease»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

Individual reflection on the topics reports (currently 10 out of 100 points)
14 svarande

Increase»3 21%
Stay the same»8 57%
Decrease»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2

18. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»3 21%
Good»6 42%
Excellent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the literature seminars»
- The guest lectures as they provided important insight in how the platform stratergy is actually used.»
- The seminars»
- Literature Seminars, Guest Lectures»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- »
- Fewer literture seminars, see a previous comment.»
- LOT of things on what it is were discussed, but too little of when and HOW to use platform/modularization.»
- I understand the idea with the reflection of the topic reports, but it felt that I reflected the same way, just with different sources. Is there another way of examine the understanding of the topic reports? »
- Report»

21. Additional comments

- Too bad that there were so much problem with the projectors. Shame on IT-service»

Kursutvärderingssystem från