Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

H12 - Design of flexible and modular automation systems, SSY290

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-07 - 2013-01-20
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 40%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Rather 10 hours.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Mostly, the time for the project. Even though it in the beginning seemed to be much more work than 20 hours/week, it was enough with scheduled time and a little more for reviews and commentary on reviews.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 20%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 20%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- What we actually did in the course was not really the same as it said in the PM.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The actual content was completely different...» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- The goals are clear, but they do not at all describe what I am supposed to learn. I guess this was what was meant to be... but during the first lecture we were told there were changes. So, the goals did not fit at all to the course that we actually studied?» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Maybe? The goals should be changed...» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»1 20%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not with the goals mentioned in the PM? So, if we hadn"t had the summary lecture, we wouldn"t have any clue about what to study?» (No, not at all)
- As the whole course was different from what the course description said, this question cannot really be answered. It is rather a no, but to some extent some parts of the goals may have been covered.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It was good as some kind of summary. To finally learn, more thorough reading in the course literature was necessary.» (Some extent)
- Good with some theory about what would be applied on the project.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- For the project, some.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 20%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I don"t like that you have to regularly check the course webpage for new messages. Even if it is on the homepage, maybe you could send an e-mail as well? Or use Pingpong, where you can send your message both as a "PIM" and as an e-mail. » (Rather badly)
- But messy in the beginning when it comes to what to send to who etc.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The one time we had a question for our mentor it was no problem to find a time to meet, however he couldn"t answer our question directly, but sent an e-mail afterwards.» (Rather good)
- Out tutor was very helpful! Cred to Sathya!» (Rather good)
- Tutoring was helpful!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»4 80%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»2 40%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It felt like a lot of the content that was intended to be there wasn"t.» (Too low)
- But felt totally ok!» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Due to Simulation project.» (High)
- Due to the simulation course that did take much time.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»1 20%
Fair»2 40%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The whole course seemed like a mess. First, the course content was totally different from what expected and specified in the course PM. This was a huge disappointment and led to frustration. Also the organization was very chaotic. Follows an extended list of what was bad: - Course Name is "Design of flexible and modular automation systems". The course was not about automation systems, neither about flexibility. It was rather "analytical improvement of serial lines". - the "project" was just solving tasks of the book. this was more like home assignments and not very demanding. You could also call it "boring". - At the beginning of the course, it was said that the project would have a share in the grade. At the end, it was just passed/failed. Consequently, a lot of work was put into a project that nobody wanted to do, but anyway did to achieve a good grade. At the end that effort was worthless, leading to frustration and anger. - At the beginning, a test exam was promised. At the end, this didn"t take place. Also the last session before the exam was really short and we were left surprised and with question marks. - we had no idea how the exam could look like and felt unprepared and confused. - the exam itself was then totally different than expected and the questions did not feel fair. - We were promised that we did not need to learn any formulas, as they would be given in the exam. Eventually, we needed some formula for the exam anyway... - The lecture material was not adapted to the course. The lecture just used someone other"s presentation. So there were slides not needed for us. The consequence: The lecturer often started to tell something and then said "well, no we don"t need this, this is not important" and went on. It sometimes felt he saw the slides for the first time when showing them. - we did not really train to solve the problems on our own. The solution always was: Use the software tool. It can solve everything for you. - much more I cannot recall now... - In summary: CHAOS!!!» (Poor)
- But this course really need to be upgraded.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Tutoring. The only thing that was good about the course.»
- The exercises.»
- project»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Either fill up the course with more content, or change the name of the course. Yes, we did design automation systems, but where was the connection to flexibility and modularity?»
- EVERYTHING! - make a project that has relevance. something practical, not only theory. Possible to use the PPU lab? - Make your own slides for the lecture! - comments on reviews are unnecessary and just take time. if there is opposition to projects, just let the group notice it and let them decide what they do with it. they don"t need to justify to anyone why they did or did not do something. - keep your promises. if you specify something at the beginning, make sure that also happens! »
- The project should be complemented so that it is not just calculation of serial lines. The course name is: "Design of flexible and modular automation systems". Flexible systems? Have not seen, I think. Modular systems? No... Automation systems? To what extent has it been automation? I have rather studied a course about calculations on serial production lines. What about labs in the PPU-lab? »
- the structure. Rewrite the course information or add plc into the studies when written in the information»

16. Additional comments

- If this course is not radically changed, it should be deleted totally. As it was now, this is no solution!»
- good course but could be better. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.2

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.2
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.3

Kursutvärderingssystem från