ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Finite element method - Solids, TME250

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-04 - 2013-02-11
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 73%
Kontaktperson: Fredrik Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- unnecessary much time since THE COURSE LITERATURE WAS NOT FINISHED ON TIME, BAD!!» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»2 18%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 9%
75%»4 36%
100%»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- othewise one would not have any theory in order to fulfill the mandatory assignments on time.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 27%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- the goals include terminology that is unclear for those who are not well familiar with the subject.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 11%
Yes, definitely»8 88%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- since no one had any time to study the two last chapters due to late distribution and tight assignment deadlines most did not had enogh knowledge in the suject. It feels like the examiners weremost interested in having as many students as possible passed.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- fredrik and magnus were both good teacher...» (Great extent) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The study questions were too difficult. It was not possible to find any guidance at all for a number of the questions/proofs in the course literature, which can be frustrating.» (Some extent)
- once it was distributed, unfortionately toooooooooooooo late» (Large extent)
- Good with course compendia, free and tailored to fit the course. Freshly written, so there were a few inevitable errors and they sometimes came out a bit late, but otherwise good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»2 18%
Rather badly»2 18%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- much of the corse matherial where to late » (Very badly)
- The handouts were handed out way to late. They should be available before the assignment are handed out, not weeks later. » (Very badly)
- The course literature was always late» (Rather badly)
- when there were something to publish....» (Very well)

Projects

9. How was the workload for CA1 on incompressible elasticity

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»6 54%
High»4 36%
Too High»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- here we had unfinishe course literature to use which was ok.» (Adequate)

10. To what extent was CA1 interesting and helpful for your learning?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- most repetition» (Some extent)

11. How was the workload for CA2 on (visco)plasticity

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»6 54%
Too High»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- we used coppies of some incomplete messy oh slides through almost the whole assignment» (High)

12. To what extent was CA2 interesting and helpful for your learning?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- badly definde question » (Small extent)
- The task was interesting, but I did not see the connection between the task and the (quite) theoretical framework presented in the lectures. Perhaps the lectures can be modified?» (Some extent)
- did not learn anything by doing the assignment itself, only by reporting it.» (Some extent)

13. How was the workload for CA3 on adaptive FEM

11 svarande

Too low»1 9%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»6 54%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- no coure literature avalable until last days. » (High)

14. To what extent was CA3 interesting and helpful for your learning?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- did not learn anything by doing the assignment itself, only a litle bit by reporting it.» (Small extent)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»6 54%
I did not seek help»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- fortiunately,...» (Very good) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- as you probably already figured out» (Very well)

17. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 45%
High»5 45%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- High and adequate.» (High)
- mostly due to late distribution of course literature» (Too high)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»4 36%
High»6 54%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- not due to this course...» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»4 36%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- will probably be much better next year since unfinished course literature will be avalable from start, make sure to distribute it» (Fair)
- a real god corse exept the late material» (Fair)
- The course would have been very good if not for the late hand outs of the course material.» (Adequate)
- Improvements needed with material ready before course starts.........» (Good)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The examination format was good. The study questions were good in that they forced you to thoroughly work through the course material. Another advantage is that the finished answers can be saved for future reference. Because the course material is quite extensive, an exam based more or less on the given questions and nothing else seems fair.»
- The compendium !»
- The computer assignments - they were interesting»
- the grade structure (9+9 points) and the seminar task, good to make own reflections and interpretations of literature»
- Lectures where the teacher writes on the board»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps proof-read the compendia, there were a few confusing errors.»
- Reduce the time needed to solve the assignements ?»
- The viscoplasticity part - the "generic constitutive framework" was not clear at all. A motivation to the rather theoretical approach of the course could also be a good idea.»
- make sure to distribute the unfinished cours literature you got from start, it is helpfull even if it is not fully correct.»
- hand out time and the secon asigment I tink the hole part with material modeling shod be reworkt»
- Kenneth"s overhead slides. They are almost worthless. Why doesn"t he use the blackboards? He draws small/minimal illustrative pictures in the margin of his overheads when he as four full blackboards behind him, that is extremely stupid. It is impossible to get any information out of the small figures. And the same goes for all small comments he writes on the overheads. If it is unclear or even wrong, rewrite it on the blackboard so every one can follow. »
- Kenneth"s overhead slides! It was hard to see and follow when he used overhead»

22. Additional comments

- start prepairing next years literature TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! The course was not difficult it was only werry poorly organized.»
- »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.54
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.54
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63

Kursutvärderingssystem från